Thursday, September 16, 2010

Latest Senate Polling

    Washington State

    Senator Patty Murray (D) has a slight lead (51%) over Dino Rossi,the Republican challenger who has 46%.

In 10 previous surveys conducted since January, the candidates have been within two points of each other seven times. Murray's support has ranged from 45% to 50%, while Rossi has picked up 46% to 49%.      RasmussenReports

    Over in the state of Delaware, Chris Coons (D) has a pretty good edge (53%) over his Republican challenger (Christine O’Donnell)(42%).

4% of those polled say that they are undecided at this point while 1% would like to have someone else to vote for.

Harry Reid is having a pretty tough time of it out in Nevada as those polled have Reid and his Republican challenger (Sharron Angle) tied at 48% each. 2% would like another candidate and 3% are undecided.

   Hate to say it (not really) but this might be a career ender for Senator Reid. I’d like to see him retired,only not by a Republican.

   Oh well, can’t have everything.

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

Investigators Say That Egg Farm Knew Of Salmonella…

…which is not a surprise, is it? With the lax government over-site of our food industry in the past few decades, would you worry about a little food poisoning if it were going to maybe cost you a lot of money to fix the problem? Wouldn’t you also try to avoid what could be massive fines and lawsuits ?

Congressional investigators say the Iowa egg farm at the center of a massive salmonella outbreak received hundreds of positive results for salmonella in the two years before its eggs sickened more than 1,500 people.

In a letter Tuesday to the company's owner, the House Energy and Commerce Committee says that investigators have obtained records showing that Wright County Egg received 426 positive results for salmonella between 2008 and 2010.

    Next week, the owner of the company is due to testify before the same committee.

Obama’s Suggested Next Steps For The Economy

    First off, Obama needs to let those Bush tax cuts expire,period. The government needs the money. I’m not sure about you, but I have not seen to many rich folks down at the unemployment office or feeding at a soup kitchen.have you? I have not seen them sleeping out on curbs and in cardboard boxes either. The wealthy can afford to pay the taxes that they should be paying. More tax cuts equals more budget cuts which will give you and I less services from our local governments.

A Plan B for Obama; Education Bubble     Edited:Complete Post at Dollars & Sense Blog                                       

(1) What we would like Obama to do: From Thomas Palley’s contribution to Martin Wolf’s Economists’ Forum at

Plan B for Obama on the economy

September 6, 2010 4:54pm

By Thomas I. Palley

TO: President Obama
FROM: Thomas I. Palley
RE: How to avoid stagnation and restore shared prosperity
DATE: Labor Day, 2010

Mr President,

With hopes of a V- or U-shaped recovery fading, there is the increasing prospect of an L-shaped future of long stagnation, or even a W-shaped future in which W stands for something worse.

The reason for this dismal outlook is economic policy is trapped by failed conventional thinking that can only deliver wage stagnation and prolonged mass unemployment.

Your administration’s current economic recovery programme has been marked by four major failings:

1. Inadequate fiscal stimulus.
2. Failure to cauterise the housing market
3. Failure to neutralise the trade deficit
4. Failure to restore the link between wage and productivity growth

If your policy team remedies these four failings our economy will quickly begin robust recovery. However, the longer you wait the greater the challenge, because recession creates new facts in the form of bankruptcies, foreclosures, destroyed credit histories, job losses and factory closures.

Suggested remedies:

1. Let the Bush administration tax cuts expire and use the savings for additional targeted stimulus

The economy needs a further demand boost to establish recovery momentum. The majority of the Bush tax cuts were an income redistribution program favoring the wealthy rather than a stimulus or growth program. That makes extending them bad policy.

The Bush 10 per cent bracket and marriage provisions should be retained, while everything else should be allowed to expire with the savings used to fund new temporary fiscal stimulus.

Half the funds should be directed to state and local governments to help avoid another round of job losses, this time in state and local government. The other half should fund an immediate lump sum non-taxable payment to all individuals earning less than $50,000 ($100,000 for married couples). This means 80 per cent of households will continue benefiting and the total paid to these households will actually increase.

Moreover, the lump-sum design will increase the benefit going to those at the bottom, which will further stimulate demand and also lower income inequality. This temporary stimulus should be repealed once self-sustaining recovery is underway.

2. Cauterise the housing market

The second critical measure is to cauterise the housing market. Throughout the crisis, policy has disproportionately benefited banks and corporations. It has largely failed to help households directly and has instead relied on hopes of trickle-down effects from banks, combined with expensive tax subsidies to attract new home buyers.

The failure to directly help households has been a grievous policy error. Along with banks and corporations, households have needed debt relief but this has not been forthcoming. Banks have resisted meaningful loan modifications, while many households have been unable to refinance mortgages at lower interest rates because of zero or negative home equity. Consequently, the household sector has remained distressed and trapped in a foreclosure tsunami that has traumatised the economy.

Policy must immediately put a floor under existing homeowners. The solution is to use the Federal Housing Administration to refinance Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac mortgages with low or even negative equity and then have Fannie and Freddie repay some of their federal government borrowings. The test criteria should be whether the mortgage is viable once refinanced at low rates.

Additionally, the Federal Reserve must continue with purchases of mortgage-backed securities to ensure that mortgage rates stay low until the housing market has stabilised.

Refinancing such mortgages will yield a huge boost to the distressed corner of the household sector that is currently unable to refinance. It would reduce foreclosures; boost consumer demand by lowering mortgage payments; and it is urgent because adjustable rate mortgages issued late in the bubble are still resetting upward.

The problem has always been inability to service interest costs, and the foreclosure wave could have been avoided if lower interest servicing had been made immediately available to households. Policy did this for the business sector via the TARP and various Federal Reserve rescue facilities but failed to do so for households.

3. Neutralise the trade deficit

The third critical measure is to neutralise the trade deficit. The adverse effects of the trade deficit can be understood through the metaphor of a bathtub. Fiscal and monetary stimulus is being poured into the tub but that demand is leaking out through the plughole of the trade deficit. Moreover, it is not just demand that leaks out, but also jobs and investment due to off-shoring.

The trade deficit and off-shoring are significantly attributable to China’s under-valued exchange rate, which also forces other countries to under-value their exchange rates to stay competitive. This has resulted in an over-valued dollar which makes the US economy internationally uncompetitive.

As China refuses to correct its under-valued exchange rate, it is long past time for the US to take protective action. That can be done via administrative interventions and legislation to make countries with under-valued exchange rates subject to countervailing duties.

There may be trade disruption and retaliation, but the costs of inaction and appeasement are far worse. The problem of under-valued exchange rates was visible a decade ago yet policymakers have failed to take action with devastating consequences.

The choice has always been pay now or pay more later. Inaction means working families have already paid enormously and continued inaction will compound their devastation.

4. Restore the wage – productivity growth link

Finally, policy must address the central problem of the last 30 years: the destruction of the income generating process and severing of the wage – productivity growth link.

Rebuilding that link is critical to recovery and shared prosperity, and it requires rebuilding worker bargaining power. One immediate measure is passage of the Employee Free Choice Act that will enable unions to organise on a level playing field.

A second measure is to index the minimum wage to the median wage. That will create a real wage floor and limit wage inequality because the minimum wage will automatically increase as median wages rise with productivity.

5. Do it all

It is important these measures are enacted as a comprehensive package. Implemented alone they will be far less successful.

Without tackling the trade deficit, fiscal stimulus and the benefits from cauterising the housing market will leak out of the economy. Similarly, increasing union membership and wages will result in an acceleration of job and investment off-shoring.

Fixing the trade deficit without fixing the income generation process and lightening households’ debt burden will leave the economy permanently short of demand.

Escaping the Great Recession requires jumpstarting the economy by increasing demand. Preventing the economy falling back into stagnation requires rebuilding the income and demand generating process. That is why success needs the full policy package.

Thomas Palley is a Schwartz Economic Growth Fellow at the New America Foundation.

(2) What Obama is proposing to do:  From yesterday’s Financial Times:

Obama unveils new stimulus plans

By Anna Fifield in Washington

Published: September 8 2010 13:03

President Barack Obama on Wednesday took Republicans to task over their economic “values” as he promotes an $180bn package of proposals to stimulate the anaemic US economy and show the American public he is working to boost the recovery.

At a speech in Cleveland, Ohio, Mr Obama made a strong case for permanently extending Bush-era tax cuts for the middle class. But he made clear that he opposes the Republican plan to extend tax cuts for the richest two per cent of Americans, which the White House says would add $700bn to the deficit over the next decade.

“The president will be talking about the values and the diverging paths of the two parties,” a senior administration official said ahead of the president’s speech, part of a week of economic announcements geared towards the November Congressional elections.

Mr Obama deliberately gave the speech in Cleveland to provide a contrast between Democrats’ policies and those laid out in the Ohio city last month by John Boehner, the minority leader in the House, who stands to become speaker if the Republicans take control, as forecast by many analysts.

“It’s propitious that we should be in Cleveland where Mr Boehner was a few weeks ago outlining the Republican plans,” the official said.

Mr Obama has tried to make the midterm elections a choice between going back to the ways of the Republicans – who he has repeatedly said drove the economy “into a ditch” – and Democrats, portrayed as getting the car back on the road again.

The Bush tax cuts are a contentious issue as the midterms approach. Republicans argue that no one should face what would amount to a tax increase while the economy remains in such bad shape, whereas the White House says giving tax cuts to “millionaires and billionaires” does nothing to stimulate growth.

The White House wants the top-tax cuts – which reduced the tax rate for individuals earning more than $200,000 and couples earning more than $250,000 from 39 to 35 per cent – to expire at the end of the year. But some Democrats, facing tough re-election battles, are nervous about letting them lapse.

Read the rest of the article. The Obama is also promoting a plan “to allow companies to write off capital investments”, plus a business tax credit for R&D, plus an infrastructure investment initiative.

Sunday, September 12, 2010

Immigration:What To Do About It

  For my part, I think that we should close the border to our south and post signs along the way,in Spanish, that if you are caught illegally coming into the United States a second time then you will be shot on sight. That would curb that problem a little bit.

   I know, that would be just a little harsh.

   Here is a much less violent solution to the problem from a guest commentator which was printed in the online version of  The Tampa Tribune. This is only part of the story, so hit the link and go read all of it, okay? The writer thinks that citizenship is the answer.

First, close the borders, enforce immigration laws and set strict conditions reflecting national needs for new immigrants.

To show the absurdity that such measures are motivated by racism, just consider that perhaps one-third of the world would like to be economic migrants to our shores. Mexicans simply have the advantage of being able to walk across the border. Is this not discriminatory to Guatemalans and Hondurans, Peruvians and Paraguayans living so much farther away? People from Benin, Belarus, Bosnia, Borneo and Bulgaria don't show up much at all, do they? Simple geography debunks arguments about racism.

Second, we should enable as many as possible of the 10 million lacking legal status to become full citizens, on the condition that they earn it.

   He suggest such things as having immigrants join the military for a period of time or to either do some sort of community service if the military is not an option.  Good start, I think.