Be INFORMED

Tuesday, February 01, 2011

Meanwhile, Jordan Gets In On The Protest Fever And…

    ….it is being reported that  King Abdullah II has dismissed his  government due to the street protests which started on Tuesday over prices and reforms. They’ve protested in previous weeks but today the people took it up a notch.

Jordanians had been calling for the resignation of prime minister Samir Rifai who is blamed for a rise in fuel and food prices and slowed political reforms.
A Jordanian official said the monarch officially accepted the resignation of Rifai, a wealthy politician and former court adviser, and asked Marouf Bakhit to form a new cabinet.  

"[Bakhit] is a former general and briefly ambassador to Israel who has been prime minister before. He's someone who would be seen as a safe pair of hands," Rosemary Hollis, professor of Middle East policy studies at London's City University, said.      Al Jazeera

    Many of the people of Jordan are getting bolder after having watched the Egyptian citizens take on the establishment there with some pretty good results. Jordanians blame  free market corruption  for the sad state the poor in the country.

   Sort of like what has been going on in the United States with the middle class and the poor.

Health Care Reform

                      Original Article

Mitt: No apology for HIS individual health care mandate

by Jed Lewison Tue Feb 01, 2011
While all this focus on the constitutionality of the individual health care mandate might be an annoying political distraction for the White House, for Mitt Romney it's an absolute f^$#!ng disaster because now, every time the subject of health care reform comes up, the first thing Mitt has to do is explain why it was okay for him to sign the individual health care mandate into law, but it was really horrible for Barack Obama to do the same thing. Case in point:

Mitt Romney: No Apology for Individual Health Care Mandate

On the kick off to his "No Apology" book tour Mitt Romney is on message – refusing to apologize for the Massachusetts health care law that, like President Obama’s federal legislation, requires citizens to buy health insurance.

“I’m not apologizing for it, I’m indicating that we went in one direction and there are other possible directions. I’d like to see states pursue their own ideas, see which ideas work best,” Romney told me.

That stand seems to reject the advice of Karl Rove and others who say that Romney can’t get the GOP nomination in 2012 unless he finds a way to distance himself from "Romneycare", but Romney did concede that his Massachusetts plan is imperfect.

So, basically, Mitt's answer now boils down to this: my individual health care mandate was okay because I was a governor. Barack Obama's wasn't okay because he was president. In other words, it's a state's rights issue.

Sarah Palin A Russian Spy?

 

 

 

 

Oh Yes! The Republicans Hard At Work To Screw Social Security Recipients If Necessary

   If not for the fact that many seniors in this country rely on their monthly Social Security checks to live on, this would be funny.

Edited for length

GOP intros bills to "Pay China First" before Soc. Sec. recipients

by Eclectablog      Mon Jan 31, 2011
You might think the GOP hates the poor and the elderly and, really, all of those that rely on entitlement payments of one sort or another. But I'll bet you didn't know how much they hate them.
They hate them enough to introduce
a bill that prioritizes paying off our debt to China over their monthly checks.
That's right. Congressman Tom McClintock of California has introduced H.R. 421 – "To require that the Government prioritize all obligations on the debt held by the public in the event that the debt limit is reached." This bill would prioritize payments to China and our other creditors over our own citizens should Congress not raise the debt ceiling.

According to Talking Points Memo, Pat Toomey will do the same in the Senate.

"I intend to introduce legislation that would require the Treasury to make interest payments on our debt its first priority in the event that the debt ceiling is not raised," Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA) wrote in a Friday Wall Street Journal op-ed.
If passed, Toomey's plan would require the government to cut large checks to foreign countries, and major financial institutions, before paying off its obligations to Social Security beneficiaries and other citizens owed money by the Treasury -- that is, if the U.S. hits its debt ceiling.

UPDATE: Here's the text of Toomey's Senate bill (S.B. 163 – "The Full Faith and Credit Act", [aka, "The Pay China First Act"]):

In the event that the debt of the United States Government, as defined in section 3101 of title 31, United States Code, reaches the statutory limit, the authority of the Department of the Treasury provided in section 3123 of title 31, United States Code, to pay with legal tender the principal and interest on debt held by the public shall take priority over all other obligations incurred by the Government of the United States.

(H/T to hope4usa who emailed me the Senate bill [all two pages of it.])

Here are some reactions from around the country.
From
Xavier Becerra of California:

Hard to believe, but true: members of the new Republican majority have introduced legislation that rips the hard earned Social Security benefits out of the hands of seniors, widows and disabled workers—and hands them over to creditors like China. This ‘Pay China First’ plan would treat retired American workers as second class citizens in line behind foreign lenders even though Social Security had nothing to do with the nation's $14 trillion debt. Working Americans want us to focus on cutting wasteful spending—and keep our hands off of their hard earned benefits.

From Chris Van Hollen, Congressman from Maryland and Ranking Member on the Budget Committee:

House Republicans’ new proposal to put foreign creditors – including China – before American families is deeply troubling and will hurt our economic recovery.  There is no question that we must come together as a Congress now to put a long-term plan in place to reduce the deficit.  But this country must not put China first, and fail to extend that same full faith and credit to American taxpayers.  We must get our fiscal house in order, and at the State of the Union the President laid out ideas to tackle this challenge.  But for the new Republican majority to do so at the expense of the economic security of American families and seniors is reckless and irresponsible.  Democrats will fight any legislation that doesn’t put American families first.

Kent Conrad, Chairman of the Budget Committee:

It is a dreadful idea. Basically what the Republicans are saying is pay China first; we're going to forget about the American public and the things that they need. Somehow they are secondary?

================
Cross-posted at Eclectablog.com.