Be INFORMED

Saturday, February 05, 2011

Sarah Palin Refused A Trademark

     In case you did not know it, Sarah Palin has tried to get both her name and her daughters name ( Bristol ) trademarked by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office.  Well, that is not going to happen be cause apparently she forgot to sign the forms which were submitted to the office.

Reuters

Applications to trademark the names Sarah Palin and Bristol Palin, both for "motivational speaking services," were filed on November 5 by the Palins' longtime family attorney, Thomas Van Flein, but were quickly slapped down by a trademark examiner.

"Registration is refused because the applied-for mark, SARAH PALIN, consists of a name identifying a particular living individual whose consent to register the mark is not of record," the patent agency said in an office action.

"Please note this refusal will be withdrawn if applicant provides written consent from the individual identified in the applied-for mark," the patent office said.

   The forms for the brat, Bristol, will also have to be redone. Her attorney says that the trademarks will be approved when they are submitted in the correct manner.

   What an idiot! Sarah Palin can’t fill out a form and sign it, but she has fantasies of being the President of the United States? Give me a break.

   I think that the idiot believe that having her name trademarked will stop bloggers and such others from using her name in articles that she would not approve of, but that is not going to happen.

Bristol Palin became a fan sensation as a contestant on the popular ABC show "Dancing with the Stars."

An unwed, single mom as a teenager, Bristol Palin has also made a name for herself giving talks about teen pregnancy and abstinence from sex.

    Just what would an unwed mother know about sexual abstinence? Has she become another one of those “ born again “ virgins or something?

   Sarah and Bristol Palin. Go back to Alaska and get lost in the woods on your way back home.

Mubarak’s Secret Police Busy With Journalist

Original Article

Egyptian Secret Police Taking Journalists

by kck     Sat Feb 05, 2011
Neither freedom nor democracy can exist without a functioning press.

An illustration of what the Egyptian uprising is all about.

Two NYT journalists, Souad Mekhennet, Nicholas Kulish, and their driver were stopped at a civilian checkpoint as they were trying to drive into Cairo Thursday. They were detained for 24 hours. Stopped, searched, seized into custody because they were journalists sending pictures and bearing witness, beginning a frightening and uncertain detention.

Please read this whole NYT account.

We had been detained by Egyptian authorities, handed over to the country’s dreaded Mukhabarat, the secret police, and interrogated. They left us all night in a cold room, on hard orange plastic stools, under fluorescent lights.

But our discomfort paled in comparison to the dull whacks and the screams of pain by Egyptian people that broke the stillness of the night. In one instance, between the cries of suffering, an officer said in Arabic, "You are talking to journalists? You are talking badly about your country?"

A voice, also in Arabic, answered: "You are committing a sin. You are committing a sin."

Yesterday news of the first journalist in Cairo killed was published. Ahmed Mohammed Mahmoud, 36, was shot by a sniper as he stood on his balcony photographing Egyptian security forces confronting protesters.

Foreign and Egyptian journalists, photographers, and news staff have been detained, stripped of their equipment, stabbed, beaten, blindfolded and detained. Still, the news reports, video, and phoned in blog posts spread the word. It's as if the uprising is globalized. Courageous journalists enabling and honoring courageous Egyptians and creating a sphere of support and enthusiasm for their demands.     

The free flow of information is the enemy of tyranny.

...we were driven to a military base. The military had been the closest thing Egypt had to a guarantor of stability and we thought once we explained who we were and provided documentation we would be allowed to go to our hotel.

In a strange exchange that only made sense later, Ms. Mekhennet asked a soldier, "Where are you taking us?" The soldier answered: "My heart goes out to you. I’m sorry."

After driving to several more bases we were told we were being handed over to the Mukhabarat at their headquarters in Nasr City...

The Mukhabarat is Egypt's intelligence service run since 1993 by Omar Suleiman, until his reassignment this week.

The Mukhabarat has had a working relationship with American intelligence, including the C.I.A.’s so-called rendition program of prison transfers. During our questioning, a man nearby was being beaten — the sickening sound somewhere between a thud and a thwack. Between his screams someone yelled in Arabic, "You’re a traitor working with foreigners."

Souad Mekhennet is familiar with intelligence agencies and their use of rendition and torture. It was she who broke the story in the NYT about the German citizen, Khaled el-Masri, mistakenly dragged into a nightmare of rendition and torture all because his name was similar to an Al-Qaeda operative. Mr. el-Masri was kidnapped by the United States while on vacation in Yugoslavia, transported to a prison in Afghanistan, and tortured by the CIA. We can only imagine Souad Mekhennet's thoughts and calculations while detained as she saw blindfolded colleagues tied up and pleading for help, hearing the screams and cries of beatings throughout the night. 

What a story. Bone-chilling. Takes my breadth away. The so far relentless demands from the streets for these murderous enemies of free people with armies of thuggish mercenaries to go now. Courageous journalists and witnesses are real and important parts to this uprising. In fact, hopes for democracy anywhere and everywhere depend on a free functioning press. We all owe them our gratitude and support

Middle East: Latest Tweets

Twitter

Fighting erupts in southern Sudan: Rebellion by former pro-Khartoum fighters against giving up their heavy weapo... http://aje.me/i2UQm9 2 minutes ago via twitterfeed

Al Jazeera

EGYPT Time

8:12pm Thousands more pro-democracy protesters flock to Tahrir Square amid reports of possible army evacuation of the square.

8:07pm Hosni Mubarak must stay in power for the time being, says Frank Wisner, Barack Obama's special envoy for Egypt.

We need to get a national consensus around the pre-conditions for the next step forward. The president must stay in office to steer those changes.

8:01pm Al Arabiya television retracts its earlier report that Hosni Mubarak resigned as head of Egypt's ruling party.

7:33pm Al Jazeera's online producer in Cairo reports, the army is no longer negotiating to remove the protesters out off Tahrir Square, the army is still present around the square. Protesters continue to rally in Tahrir Square under the cold and rainy weather.

6:00pm General Hassan El-Rawani, the head of the army's central command, speaks to the masses in Tahrir Square urging them to leave the square, they chant back at him "We are not leaving, He [Mubarak] is leaving".

GOP: Here’s Reagan’s Real Legacy

   Conservatives all over America will be celebrating Ronald Reagan.s 100th birthday on Sunday, February 6th with many tall tales of how great a president he was and of how he reigned in big government, lowered taxes, and the deficit.

   The problem is that very little of that is true.

   A bit of Reagans fiscal irresponsibility.

The Reagan administration’s hastily prepared fiscal blueprint, however, was no match for the primordial forces — the welfare state and the warfare state — that drive the federal spending machine.

Soon, the neocons were pushing the military budget skyward. And the Republicans on Capitol Hill who were supposed to cut spending exempted from the knife most of the domestic budget — entitlements, farm subsidies, education, water projects. But in the end it was a new cadre of ideological tax-cutters who killed the Republicans’ fiscal religion.             David Stockton

DKOS

A born-again convert to supply side economics, Ronald Reagan came to office in 1981 promising to simultaneously slash taxes, massively increase defense spending and balance the budget.  Instead, as his budget director David Stockman acknowledged last year, Reagan produced red ink as far as the eye could see:

"[The] debt explosion has resulted not from big spending by the Democrats, but instead the Republican Party's embrace, about three decades ago, of the insidious doctrine that deficits don't matter if they result from tax cuts."

Which is exactly right.  While the Republicans' fiscal rot deepened under George W. Bush, it began with Ronald Reagan. It was the legendary Gipper whose financial recklessness and tax-cutting fetish came to define the modern GOP.

image

As predicted, Reagan's massive $749 billion supply-side tax cuts in 1981 quickly produced even more massive annual budget deficits. Combined with his rapid increase in defense spending, Reagan delivered not the balanced budgets he promised, but record-settings deficits. Even his OMB alchemist David Stockman could not obscure the disaster with his famous "rosy scenarios."

Forced to raise taxes twice to avert financial catastrophe (a fact conveniently forgotten in the conservative hagiography of Reagan manufactured by the GOP's 2008 ticket of John McCain and Sarah Palin), the Gipper nonetheless presided over a tripling of the American national debt. By the time he left office in 1989, Ronald Reagan more than equaled the entire debt burden produced by the previous 200 years of American history.

For his part, George H.W. Bush hardly stemmed the flow of red ink. And when Bush the Elder broke his "read my lips, no new taxes" pledge to address the cascading budget shortfalls, his own Republican Party turned on him. While Bush's apostasy helped ensure his defeat by Bill Clinton, it was Clinton's 1993 deficit-cutting package (passed without a single GOP vote in either house of Congress) which helped usher in the surpluses and economic expansion of the late 1990's.

Alas, they were to be short-lived. Inheriting a federal budget in the black and CBO forecast for a $5.6 trillion surplus over 10 years, President George W. Bush quickly set about dismantling the progress made under Clinton. Bush's $1.4 trillion tax cut in 2001, followed by a second round in 2003, accounted for half of the yawning budget deficits he produced.  Bush's presidency nearly doubled the national debt   And as the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities concluded last year, the Bush tax cuts if made permanent would contribute more to the U.S. budget deficit over the next decade than the Obama stimulus, the TARP program, the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and revenue lost to the recession - combined.

READ MORE