Be INFORMED

Wednesday, January 17, 2007

Israeli Prime Minister Olmert The Next To Resign?

    Israeli Prime Minister Olmert and his Defense Minister Amir Peretz are being pressured to resign,according to the AP.

    As you know, the Israeli army's Chief of Staff (Lt. Gen. Dan Halutz) stepped down because of the many inquiries into the handling of the  war with Lebanon.

    At Yahoo News

    By AMY TEIBEL, Associated Press Write                        January 17,2007

"The war clearly was mismanaged, and when a war is clearly mismanaged, there is no doubt the chief of staff is responsible," said opposition lawmaker Ran Cohen, a former high-ranking military officer. "The responsibility is shared by him, the prime minister and the defense minister, and sooner or later, they, too, will have to leave."                        An opinion poll published last week showed Olmert's approval rating at just 14 percent, and his Kadima Party losing if new elections were held.

"It is not clear whether the prime minister will be able to survive the resignation of chief of staff Halutz and his own political problems," said Ephraim Inbar, a political scientist at Bar-Ilan University near Tel Aviv. "We may see pressure in his own party to replace him. This resignation is definitely the beginning of political turmoil in Israel."       The Article

                                    * * * *

   Is this not somewhat of a mirrored reflection of what is going on in our government? Only in our case, it was Rumsfeld and a few Generals (John P. Abizaid, the top U.S. commander in the Middle East, and Gen. George Casey) who happened to not agree with the Bush war ' surge'.

   Of course, this is Prime Minister Olmert's own fault for listening to Bush in the first place! You do not take advice about war from someone who cannot even spell ' war' much less conduct one!

   Impeach Bush!!

 

Technorati tags: ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

U.S. Attorney Carol Lam Resigns

    This makes the third (?) resignation by this group of attorneys in a week and a half.

    Ms. Lam will step down on February 15.

    From North County Times

By: WILLIAM FINN BENNETT - Staff Writer

January 17,2007         Entire Article

The release did not provide a reason for Lam's resignation nor did it say if she had been asked to resign. Reached by phone late Tuesday, a spokeswoman for the 47-year-old Lam said that there would be no other comment.                          In a Tuesday phone interview from his Washington office, U.S. Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Vista, said Lam was asked to step down.                                                                                     Issa declined to name the source of the information, but said "it was a high-ranking administration official involved in the decision process.                                                               In a speech on the Senate floor Tuesday, U.S. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., said that it was recently brought to her attention that several U.S. attorneys have been asked to resign, some by the end of the month and prior to the end of their terms.                                                                      She said the resignation requests were not based on any allegation of misconduct.                                                       "In other words, they are forced resignations," Feinstein said.                                                                                      She expressed concern that Gonzales plans to appoint interim replacements and "potentially avoid Senate confirmation."                                                                          A little-known provision in the Patriot Act reauthorization last year changed existing law so that if a vacancy occurs, the attorney general can appoint a replacement for an indefinite period of time.         MORE!

                                      * * * *

    As you can see, the Bush Crime Family continues its onslaught against law and order and against the American people! Sen. Feinstein hit it on the nose with her concerns about Gonzales wanting to skirt the Senate confirmation of the new 'replacements.'

    I am now placing Gonzales on my list of top  Bush Crime Family "warlords." This is another one who has to go!

 

Technorati tags: ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Early Morning News Blast

According to The Washington Post

By Lori Montgomery and Jeffrey H. Birnbaum
Washington Post Staff Writers
Wednesday, January 17, 2007

The Senate Finance Committee is considering a proposal to sharply limit the earnings corporate executives and other highly paid employees can place tax-free into deferred compensation plans, one of the most popular executive benefits in corporate America.          Entire Article

     Next up is an article on the eyes of modern technology. This follows Mrs. Kitty Bernard  throughout her day from home to work and back home again.

    The point of this article is to show the reader just how much all of this modern technology keeps records of you in your daily activities.

   The Washington Post

Enjoying Technology's Conveniences But Not Escaping Its Watchful Eyes

By Ellen Nakashima
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, January 16, 2007

The tracking of Kitty Bernard begins shortly after she wakes up. All through the 56-year-old real estate agent's day, from walking in her building's lobby to e-mailing friends and shopping and working, the watchful eye of technology records her movements and preferences.                    Welcome to the 21st century.      Entire Article

    ...and speaking of your personal records. Here is one on the legality's of obtaining your private emails,phone calls, ect. This deals mostly with the ways that the Bush Crime Family interprets and uses them for our 'protection' against terrorist and such non-sense.

    The Washington Post

The Legal Tangles Of Data Collection

By Ellen Nakashima
Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, January 16, 2007

When it comes to data collection, federal laws often have been outpaced by technology, critics say. And sometimes, the executive branch carves out its own exception.             U.S. law requires that law enforcement officials obtain a warrant to tap someone's phone or intercept e-mail. But President Bush, drawing on decades-old precedent, asserts that he has "inherent authority" to authorize agents to intercept electronic communications without a warrant in the interest of national security.

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Tuesday, January 16, 2007

The Democrat's Bills Overshadowed By Iraq

   This is part of an article which appeared in The Washington Post on Tuesday dealing with the fact that most of the bills passed by the house Democrats aren't getting much notice because of the Iraq situation.

   It makes note of the fact that most of the Democrats who appeared on the "Fox News" shows gave the host's a taste of their own medicine.

   Entire Article

 

The One and Only Issue

By Howard Kurtz

Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, January 16, 2007

Remember the Democrats' first 100 hours?

Haven't heard much about that lately, have you?

The reason is the more than 33,000 hours we've been in Iraq.

Never mind that House Democrats have kept their promise by boosting the minimum wage, loosening federal restrictions on stem-cell research and allowing Medicare to negotiate over drug prices. In a normal environment, these domestic initiatives would be a major deal. But it increasingly seems that the war obliterates everything else.

Are Democrats so pumped up they're unable to be gracious winners these days? The New Republic's Michelle Cottle thinks so:

"There was an epidemic of air rage, in which Democrats invaded hostile Fox TV territory to pummel conservatives--perhaps inspired by Bill Clinton's epic dress-down of Chris Wallace in a September interview. Leading the way was Frank, who ripped into Wallace for 'an odd view of balance' and for asking questions 'aimed at trying to find points of controversy.' He then appeared on 'The O'Reilly Factor,' where he denounced its host as a 'silly would-be district attorney.' (O'Reilly called Frank 'dopey' in response.) Incoming Ways and Means Chairman Charles Rangel, meanwhile, had a similar postelection duel with Fox's Sean Hannity, whom he addressed as 'Mr. Prosecutor' while mocking Fox's 'Fair and Balanced' slogan.

 

Technorati tags: , ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Sen. Dodd's Bill Would Cap Troops Levels,Attorneys Being Fired,and Saudi Arabia May Send Troops To Iraq

Tuesday, January 16, 2007
Dodd introduces bill to cap U.S. troop levels in Iraq
WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Sen. Chris Dodd, D-Connecticut, is hoping to become a strong voice against President Bush's plan to increase U.S. troops in Iraq.

The presidential candidate introduced legislation Tuesday that put a limit on the number of troops in Iraq at about 132,000.

Under Dodd's bill any additional troops sent to Iraq would require congressional approval.

It is currently unclear how many of Dodd's Democratic colleagues will support the measure and whether it will be debated on the Senate Floor.

-- CNN Congressional Correspondent Andrea Koppe

                                           * * * *

   Bush will just do another signing statement if this bill actually passes.

    In other news:

    From MSNBC

By Alex Johnson and Andrea Mitchell
MSNBC and NBC News
Updated: 5:01 p.m. CT Jan 16, 2007

Saudi Arabia believes the Iraqi government is not up to the challenge and has told the United States that it is prepared to move its own forces into Iraq should the violence there degenerate into chaos, a senior U.S. official told NBC News on Tuesday.                                   Entire Article

 

From TPMmuckraker

WH Moved Swiftly to Replace US Attorneys
By Paul Kiel - January 16, 2007, 3:22 PM

The administration is replacing U.S. Attorneys throughout the country. How'd they get that power?

It was an obscure provision in the USA PATRIOT Improvement and Reauthorization Act, and it didn't take them very long to use it. The president signed it into law in March of last year -- by June, they were already moving to replace unwanted prosecutors.                 Entire Article

    Like wet sand through the hourglass, these are the days of our lives!

    I am telling you all! That shithead in the White house is working on a dictatorship.

 

Technorati tags: , , ,

Bush Speaks on Volunteers

    George Bush is putting one hell of a strain on our military while sending volunteer ( National Guard ) troops over to Iraq.

    Here is what he had to say when his own military service was compared to today's.

   From DailyKos

Volunteers

by mcjoan
Tue Jan 16, 2007

I was on a plane Sunday night, so mercifully was spared the dilemma of whether I should watch Bush on 60 Minutes. Instead, I get to read what others are saying about it, and in doing so, came across this part of the interview posted at the MoJo Blog:

A telling moment in the interview (this one's not in the transcript, perhaps because it was not in the formal sitdown session) came when Pelley asked Bush whether multiple deployments, two, three, four of them for some, were fair to the troops and their families. Bush answered saying, "this military is motivated," (meaning, and I'm guessing here, that soldiers are more than happy to leave their families and return again and again to Iraq?).

But the toll it's taking on soldiers, pushed Pelley, who then referenced Bush's brief service in the National Guard:

Pelley: In Vietnam as you know, you served 365 and you were done.

Bush: This is a different situation. This is a volunteer army. In Vietnam, it was, ‘We’re going to draft you and you’re going to go for a year.'

Well, for George Bush it most definitely was not "We're going to draft you and you're going for a year." It was, "Your Daddy's a Congressman? Well, sure you can volunteer and 'serve' with the Texas Air National Guard. When you feel like showing up, that is."

So let's do a little compare and contrast exercise with volunteering for service in George Bush's world. Here's his own experience:

It was May 27, 1968, at the height of the Vietnam War. Bush was 12 days away from losing his student deferment from the draft at a time when Americans were dying in combat at the rate of 350 a week. The unit Bush wanted to join offered him the chance to fulfill his military commitment at a base in Texas. It was seen as an escape route from Vietnam by many men his age, and usually had a long waiting list.

Bush had scored only 25 percent on a "pilot aptitude" test, the lowest acceptable grade. But his father was then a congressman from Houston, and the commanders of the Texas Guard clearly had an appreciation of politics.

Bush was sworn in as an airman the same day he applied. His commander, Col. Walter B. "Buck" Staudt, was apparently so pleased to have a VIP's son in his unit that he later staged a special ceremony so he could have his picture taken administering the oath, instead of the captain who actually had sworn Bush in. Later, when Bush was commissioned a second lieutenant by another subordinate, Staudt again staged a special ceremony for the cameras, this time with Bush's father the congressman – a supporter of the Vietnam War – standing proudly in the background....

Among the questions Bush had to answer on his application forms was whether he wanted to go overseas. Bush checked the box that said: "do not volunteer."

And this is what today's volunteers face:

Confronted with the increasing demands of the Iraq war, the Pentagon announced plans Thursday to recall Army National Guard units that have already fought in Iraq to serve second tours, reversing a long-standing policy that allowed Guard members to return home for five years before being redeployed....

More than 200,000 Guard members and reservists from units across the country have served in Iraq or Afghanistan over the last five years, and many who had returned to civilian life could be summoned back into active duty under the policy change. Of 3,018 U.S. military deaths in Iraq, 383 were in the Army National Guard and 214 were Army or Marine reservists, according to iCasualties.org, which tracks military deaths.

Pentagon officials have said that the next round of deployments are most likely to involve the first regiments sent to Iraq in 2003 and early 2004. Among those early units was the California National Guard's 1st Battalion, 185th Armored Regiment, from San Bernardino, now an infantry unit, which served in Iraq from early 2004 until 2005.

Yes, we have an all volunteer army. Made up of a lot of people who volunteered in their states' national guards to do things like respond to hurricanes and fight forest fires. They are a volunteer army who most certainly didn't volunteer to get out of having to serve in a hellacious, pointless war like their president did. No, they volunteered to actually serve their country. And they volunteered for one year of service deployment and five years at home. Instead, they've been drafted into something they most definitely did not sign up for. For a war that should never have been fought, that has been completely mismanaged by an incompetent president.

And George Bush is going to tell them about sacrifice? The man who volunteered in order to shirk.

                                                  * * * *

 

Technorati tags: ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

James Pendergraph: A Sheriff Who Sends Illegal Immigrants Home

    James Pendergraph is a law enforcement official who does his job right!

    Sheriff Pendergraph has sent some 960 illegal immigrants home from the Mecklenburg County jail since April after he partnered up with U.S. Department of Immigration and Customs Enforcement.

    From The Charlotte Observer

He is the first sheriff east of California to sign up for ICE program 287(g), which trained 12 of his staffers to work full-time identifying and processing deportable immigrants.

In Charlotte, he is one of his county's most popular public figures, a winner of four consecutive elections, with a reputation around the courthouse as an effective administrator and something of an innovator, someone willing to see criminals for more than their crimes.

But with illegal immigration, his vision becomes more brown and white.

"We've got millions of illegal immigrants that have no business being here," he says.

And: "These people are coming to our country without documents, and they won't even assimilate."

And: "This is about homeland security. This is about the sovereignty of our country."

Right now, he sees one immigrant, the overdose, getting photographed and fingerprinted -- each finger, both thumbs -- by an ICE-trained deputy.

Little is known beyond his name, Kevin Su Lee.

Not Latino, but Korean.                                Entire Article

   The way that Sheriff Pendergraph is handling this part of his job is the way that all of the sheriff's in the U.S. should be doing it!

   He was the first east of California to enroll in this program? I wonder how many others are in it now?

 

UPDATE: I failed to mention that the article from Charlotte Observer is part of a series. Click Here  for all of it.

 

  

Ads by AdGenta.com

More American Soldiers Killed

    Four of our American soldiers where killed on Tuesday from a roadside bomb in northwestern Iraq, according to the Associated Press.

    That makes it at least 3,026 members of the U.S. military who have died since the Iraq war started in March 2003, according to an Associated Press count.

Technorati tags: ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Deadeye Dick Says We're Gonna Win

FromNews Hounds

Deadeye Dick Says We're Gonna Win, Win, Win - In 20, 30 or 40 Years!!

Reported by Marie Therese - January 15, 2007

On January 14th, Vice President Dick Cheney appeared on FOX News Sunday to help us all understand the wisdom of Bush's "everything old is new again" Iraq policy. (Host Chris Wallace actually asked tough questions, possibly as a reaction to his encounter with a finger-jabbing Bill Clinton.) Cheney spouted the usual string of talking points that we've all heard from every one of the administration's flunkies since President Bush set the stage for the "perpetual escalation" of the Iraq war. To those of us from the Vietnam generation, this all sounds like a bad instant replay. Bush, Cheney and their hand-picked band of military advisors have just repackaged the "domino" theory. If we don't win in Iraq, we'll have to fight them in Iran, then in Syria, then in Lebanon, then in Israel, then in Turkey, then in Europe, on and on until finally the Islamic boogeymen, they predict, will show up on our doorstep. It's all so distressingly familiar.

Never one to disappoint, Cheney conjured up some of our favorite images.          Entire Article

    The site that this came from keeps an eye on FoxNews and all of their right-leaning bullshit. You should visit it from time to time

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Opening Salvos of a greater Middle East War

   From Crusade-Media

12th January 2007

A war involving the US, Israel, Iran, Syria, Hezbollah and Al Qaeda…..

Commenting about the briefing on MSNBC after Bush’s nationwide address, NBC’s Washington bureau chief Tim Russert said “there’s a strong sense in the upper echelons of the White House that Iran is going to surface relatively quickly as a major issue – in the country and the world – in a very acute way.”

Another danger to American interests, however, would be pro-Iranian Shiite militias in Iraq seeking revenge against U.S. troops. If that were to happen, Bush’s escalation of troop levels in Iraq would make sense as a way to protect the Green Zone and other sensitive targets.

So, Bush’s actions and rhetoric over the past several weeks continue to mesh with a scenario for a wider regional war – a possibility that now mainstream journalists, such as Tim Russert, are beginning to take seriously.       Entire Article

    Myself and other bloggers told you that we would be going to war with Iran in the near future and it appears that it is going to happen very soon.

 

Technorati tags:

   

Ads by AdGenta.com

Rice Seeks Arabs Backing With Iraq

From YahooNews

By ANNE GEARAN, AP Diplomatic Writer Tue Jan 16,2007

RIYADH, Saudi Arabia - Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice's appeal for Arab allies to help support the fragile government in Iraq drew only a tepid endorsement Tuesday from the administration's strongest ally in the region.

Saudi Foreign Minister Saud al-Faisal said Saudis hope President Bush's plans to turn around the situation in Iraq is successful, but was plainly skeptical that the Iraqi government is up to the task of doing its part.

"We are hoping these objectives will be implemented, but the means are not in our hands," he said. "They are in the hands of the Iraqis themselves."

       What Saud al-Faisal should have said was that the Iraqi government really does not want to take the responsibility for Iraq as long as Bush and company keep adding to the mess.

 

Technorati tags: , ,

AP: Iran gets army gear in Pentagon sale

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

By SHARON THEIMER, Associated Press Writer
January 16,2007   

WASHINGTON - The U.S. military has sold forbidden equipment at least a half-dozen times to middlemen for countries — including
Iran and China — who exploited security flaws in the Defense Department's surplus auctions. The sales include fighter jet parts and missile components.     

       The story is at Yahoo News

Technorati tags: ,

Bush Wants Balanced Budget

 President Bush,in his State of the Union address next week, will tell the American viewers that one of his goals is a balanced federal budget. It is a shame that a balanced budget has not been a goal of his for the past six years as Bush has helped make the highest deficits in history with his income tax cuts, and his war in Iraq.

   So now he is going to go on record wanting a balanced budget by 2012 and it is up to the Democrats to make it happen. With Bush warming up for his attack on Iran the Democrats will have a tough time doing to much for the budget because the Bush Crime Family will be adding to the deficit and budget problems

   For those of you who may be slow on this subject, the only way to balance this budget is by cutting spending and raising some taxes, not by cutting spending or raising taxes!

   From the Washington Post

 Historically, the deficit is not particularly large. During Bush's presidency, it peaked at $413 billion in 2004, the biggest ever in dollars. At 3.6 percent of economic output, however, it did not approach the historic high, in 1943 during World War II, when the deficit exceeded 30 percent of gross domestic product . Last year, the deficit dropped to $258 billion, or about 1.8 percent of the economy.

But that view ignores some important facts, U.S. comptroller general David Walker said. The government is living far beyond its means, he said, and if not for excess cash in the Social Security trust fund, it would be recording deficits on a magnitude not seen since the recession of the early 1990s. Take away the Social Security money, and the deficit would have been $434 billion last year, about 3.3 percent of GDP, which rose 6 percent in 2005, compared with 2004.              The Article

 

Technorati tags: ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Monday, January 15, 2007

Cover-Ups Throughout Bush Administration Continue

      I have posted on the $10 billion in revenue that the government has failed to collect from companies such as ExxonMobile and Shell to extract oil and gas from federal lands, in the past.

   Here is a new twist on things, coming from Congressional Quarterly's Jeff Tollefson.

A much-anticipated report to Congress will allege that Interior Department officials covered up a problem with oil and gas leases after it was discovered in 2000, according to congressional aides.

The Interior Department inspector general (IG) also has been investigating whether Johnnie Burton, head of the agency that collects royalties, might have been told about the problem earlier than she said in congressional testimony last fall.

    But the Bush Administration isn't about oil. The war in Iraq isn't about oil. The forthcoming war with Iran isn't about oil either!

 

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

White House Forces Out Another Prosecutor

    Daniel Bogden, U.S. attorney for Nevada, has been forced into resigning by the Bush administration. This is the second prosecutor forced out in the past week. As noted by the folks at TPMmuckraker

By Justin Rood - January 15, 2007

Nevada's GOP senator, John Ensign, had recommended Bodgen for the post, and spoke to the paper for the record. "His priorities, to prevent terrorism and prosecute violent and drug crimes, have made our communities and families safer," he said.

The paper did not include a quote on the topic from Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who also represents Nevada. However, it noted that a spokesperson for Reid said the lawmaker was in favor of legislation to prevent U.S. attorneys from being replaced without Senate approval.           Entire Article

   I guess that the Bush Crime Family intends to replace these prosecutors with others who may be more inclined to not pursue any charges against them when the charges do come up.

 

Technorati tags: ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Two Saddam Aides Executed On Monday

   Saddam's two aides were executed at 3 a.m. wearing red-orange jumpsuit's.

    There was just one slight problem with one of the hangings. When     Barzan Ibrahim's body went through the trap door the poor guy lost his head, literally! His head was snapped off by the jerking of the rope which of course has angered many Sunnis.

From Yahoo News

By QASSIM ABDUL-ZAHRA, Associated Press Writer       January 15,2007

BAGHDAD, Iraq - Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki's attempt to close a chapter in Saddam Hussein's repressive quarter-century in power, by hanging two of his henchmen Monday, further enraged Sunnis when the former leader's half brother was decapitated on the gallows.

A government video of the execution screened for reporters showed Ibrahim's body passing the camera in a blur, after the decapitation. His body came to rest on its chest, with the head a few meters (yards) away, still covered in the black hood that was put there by one of his five masked executioners only moments before.       Entire Article

   I'm betting that the rope that was used was probably supplied by Halliburton. Is this another Bush 'surge' downward this time?

   I shouldn't be kidding about this but this story is just to damned funny! I'm wondering when the video will appear on the Internet?

 

Technorati tags: , ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Gates Says 'Escalation' Is About Iran

   Secretary of Defense Robert Gates told NATO this morning that the surge is really all about saving face with Iran, not the protecting the 'young democracy' crap from Presidents Bush lying mouth!

   From The Guardian

Increased US military activity in the Gulf is aimed at Iran's "very negative" behaviour, the Bush administration said today.

The defense secretary, Robert Gates, told reporters that the decision to deploy a Patriot missile battalion and a second aircraft carrier to the Gulf in conjunction with a "surge" of troops in Iraq was designed to show Iran that the US was not "overcommitted" in Iraq.

Such remarks, following the prospect of "hot pursuit" raids into Iran as raised by George Bush in his televised address last week, have fueled speculation that the US is softening up the American public for possible action against Tehran.

   Our President might want to watch what he does before he really pisses off the middle east! But then, he and the Christian Right are trying to bring World War 3 into being anyway.

 

Technorati tags: , ,

 

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Bush Undermining The Judicial System

    I ran across this posting on one of my favorite sites today.That would be Daily Kos for those of you interested.

   The article is about President Bush and his coy way of subverting the judicial process. It makes for some interesting reading so here is a partial piece of the story.

New Dangerous Judicial Subversion by Bush
by miriam
Sun Jan 14, 2007

Our Constitution's balance of power provisions have taken a huge hit under Bush: first is the amassing of unprecedented power by the executive; the second is the reduction of the legislative role to simply that of an advisory group.

And now the administration is secretly undermining the judicial branch.

The quote below is part of a letter by Senator Dianne Feinstein: http://feinstein.senate.gov

January 11, 2007

"It has come to our attention that the Bush administration is pushing out U.S. Attorneys from across the country under the cloak of secrecy and then appointing indefinite replacements without Senate confirmation. (Ed. emphasis mine) We know this is not an isolated occurrence, but we don't know how many U.S. Attorneys have been asked to resign -- it could be two, it could be ten, it could be more.  No one knows."          Entire Article

                                        * * * *

The article goes on to mention that this little provision was placed into the Patriot Act reauthorization last year.

   I'm telling you  my fellow Americans! The Bush Crime Family is working on a dictatorship because they have to much money at stake in their illegal dealings and such.

   This presidency and this administration is nothing but an on-going war profiteering enterprise!

    I am sure that the evidence for impeachment is out there somewhere and we must find it. First off though, we have to get Nancy Pelosi and the rest of the Democratic leaders to get off of that kick about impeachment being off the table!

    Call,write,phone,or fax you Representatives and Senators and tell them what you want to have happen. The time is now to begin the processes!

 

Technorati tags: ,

Sunday, January 14, 2007

On Iraq, U.S. Turns to Onetime Dissenters

By Rajiv Chandrasekaran

Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, January 14, 2007

Timothy M. Carney went to Baghdad in April 2003 to run Iraq's Ministry of Industry and Minerals. Unlike many of his compatriots in the Green Zone, the rangy, retired American ambassador wasn't fazed by chaos. He'd been in Saigon during the Tet Offensive, Phnom Penh as it was falling to the Khmer Rouge and Mogadishu in the throes of Somalia's civil war. Once he received his Halliburton-issued Chevrolet Suburban, he disregarded security edicts and drove around Baghdad without a military escort. His mission, as he put it, "was to listen to the Iraqis and work with them."
    He left after two months, disgusted and disillusioned. The U.S. occupation administration in Iraq, the Coalition Provisional Authority (CPA), placed ideology over pragmatism, he believed. His boss, viceroy L. Paul Bremer, refused to pay for repairs needed to reopen many looted state-owned factories, even though they had employed tens of thousands of Iraqis. Carney spent his days screening workers for ties to the Baath Party.

"Planning was bad," he wrote in his diary on May 8, "but implementation is worse."       WaPo Article

    So now the Bush administration is going to try to play nice with all of the groups that were disbanded after the United States raided Iraq. This should be an interesting deal for the U.S. because you can bet that the disbanded groups are going to have their respective hands out with the "What have you done for me lately?" words on their lips when Bushco comes to town.

   Do we actually pay Bush real currency for this crap? If so, we need a refund!

 

Technorati tags: ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

The Build Up To War With Iran

   Oh yes! How the plot thickens!

   It looks as if the White House is going all out to get the American public convinced that we have to do something with Iran. This attack on Iran will be done because they "put our people at risk."  I am assuming that the White House is referring to our troops in Iraq.

    National Security adviser Stephen Hadley said,"We are going to need to deal with what Iran is doing inside Iraq."

    Vice President Dick Cheney:"Iran is fishing in troubled waters inside Iraq.We do not want them doing what they can to destabilize the situation inside Iraq"

Stephen Hadley: "We know there are jihadists moving from Syria into Iraq. ... We know also that Iran is supplying elements in Iraq that are attacking Iraqis and attacking our forces.

What the president made very clear is these are activities that are going on in Iraq that are unacceptable. They put our people at risk. He said very clearly that we will take action against those. We will interdict their operations, we will disrupt their supply lines, we will disrupt these attacks."

    More

    Hadley was on "This Week" on ABC while Cheney was on "Fox News Sunday."

    Though it is always possible, if not probable, that the spin doctors at the White House are right about Iran, I question their intelligence. We have heard many times before from the Bush gang that we needed to go on the defensive before terrorist strike and of course we all know about the claims concerning Iraq. None of those claims were true. I would take any reports from the White House with a grain of salt at this point in time.

 

Technorati tags: , ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Condi Rice Says We Will Not Pull Out of Iraq

    Condi Rice,United States Secretary of State,  says that we are not pulling out of Iraq even if President Bush's 'escalation' is a failure.

Aboard her plane, Rice also told reporters that the United States would not abandon Iraq even if Bush's latest plan fails.

"We're not pulling the plug on Iraq," she said. "I think we'll worry about making Plan A work for now. And obviously, if it doesn't, then you know, we're not going to say, oh my goodness, that didn't work, there's nothing that can be done."       Entire Article

   I like that "worrying about plan A for now." Sounds to me as if the Bush Crime Family hasn't considered any options in case this 'stay the course, part 12'  doesn't work.

 

Technorati tags: ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

On Bush,Iraq,The Minimum Wage and Not Much Else!

    Here are the latest stories making the rounds on this Sunday morning.

 

House GOP Shows Its Fractiousness In the Minority

By Jonathan Weisman
Washington Post Staff Writer
Sunday, January 14, 2007

House Republican leaders, who confidently predicted they would drive a wedge through the new Democratic majority, have found their own party splintering, with Republican lawmakers siding with Democrats in droves on the House's opening legislative blitz.

Freed from the pressures of being the majority and from the heavy hand of former leaders including retired representative Tom DeLay (R-Tex.), many back-bench Republicans are showing themselves to be more moderate than their conservative leadership and increasingly mindful of shifting voter sentiment. The closest vote last week -- Friday's push to require the federal government to negotiate lower drug prices for Medicare -- pulled 24 Republicans. The Democrats' homeland security bill attracted 68 Republicans, the minimum wage increase 82.             Entire Article

                                         * * * *

   This was posted on Saturday, but just in case you missed it as I did.

 

Democrats Pledge to Extend Minimum Wage

Saturday January 13,2007     Via Excite

WASHINGTON (AP) — Fending off charges of favoritism, House Democrats say a just-passed minimum wage bill will be changed to cover all U.S. territories — including American Samoa — before it reaches President Bush's desk.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., told reporters she has instructed the House Education and Labor Committee to help get the bill changed to "make sure that all of the territories have to comply with the U.S. law on minimum wage."

Her remark Friday followed accusations from Republicans a day earlier that American Samoa, which is not now covered by the $5.15 an hour federal minimum wage, was not included in the law raising the federal pay floor to $7.25 an hour because StarKist has a large cannery in the island chain. StarKist is owned by Del Monte Foods Co., which has its headquarters in San Francisco, Pelosi's district.

"Something is indeed fishy when the federal minimum wage is good for all Americans as espoused by the Democrat majority, yet we exempt a small, in many terms economically struggling island," Rep. Patrick McHenry, R-N.C., told colleagues on the House floor last week.   Entire Article

   Maybe the GOP should try complaining about the minimum wage at its current rate.

    From Informed Comment we have this story on secret paragraphs in the agreement between the White House (Bush) and al-Maliki group in Iraq.

Saturday, January 13, 2007

Maliki Said to Have Pledged Mahdi Crackdown

Al-Hayat reports in Arabic that its sources in the Iraqi government are saying that there are some secret paragraphs to the agreement between the Bush administration and the al-Maliki government in Iraq to act against militia leaders. The article suggests that the model of the US raid on an Iranian liason office in Irbil might be deployed against Mahdi Army leaders and against Sunni Arab guerrilla commanders. That is, such raids would be small, targeted, quick and involve kidnapping suspected wrongdoers.            Entire Article

   Last but not least. I couldn't pass this one up from TruthOut

Mohamed al-Hatfield vs. Ahmed al-McCoy
By William Fisher
t r u t h o u t | Columnist

Saturday 13 January 2007

It's been a few days since President Bush spoke to the American people about his new "strategy" for "victory" in Iraq. Reading the newspapers, listening to radio and watching television, one would think all the words that could possibly be written or spoken on this speech have finally been exhausted.

But when the punditocracy gets hold of this kind of issue, the last word is never written or spoken. And I am under no delusions that my words will be anything near the last.

But I will write them anyway, because there were a couple of things that struck me.

One of them was the way of most of both the print and broadcast media bought into the president's characterization of his plan as both "new" or a "strategy." It is not new; we've had several unsuccessful "surges" in the past. And what Mr. Bush terms a "strategy" is little more than a tactical adjustment. It is "stay the course" 101.1.           Entire Article

   I guess that now I can go to bed and wait for the Sunday morning news talk-show line-up to cast their spin for the day.  I'll see you in the noon time!

 

Technorati tags: , ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Saturday, January 13, 2007

The Pentagon and the CIA Get American's Bank Data

   The Associated Press is reporting that the Pentagon is looking at some Americans banking records along with their credit records. These are just the ones that are suspected of terrorism or espionage within the U.S.

By LOLITA BALDOR, Associated Press Writer January 13,2007

WASHINGTON - The Pentagon and to a lesser extent the CIA have been using a little-known power to look at the banking and credit records of hundreds of Americans and others suspected of terrorism or espionage within the United States, officials said Saturday.

Pentagon spokesman Bryan Whitman said Saturday the Defense Department "makes requests for information under authorities of the National Security Letter statutes ... but does not use the specific term National Security Letter in its investigatory practice."       Entire Article

   Oh well, so long as the agencies aren't doing anything illegal to get the info,  Right? By this time next week you will probably read here that the Pentagon, CIA and others have been keeping a database on all Americans banking and such because President Bush thinks that we are all terrorist!

 

Technorati tags: , ,

Ads by AdGenta.com


Click Here

For You Because You Need To Use Your Voice

    Thomas Jefferson wrote, ‘Governments derive their just powers from the consent of the governed.’ We must accept that responsibility willingly by trying to stay informed and aware. It is our responsibility to question our public servants should they stray from the principals we hold so dear and to rise together with a united voice to hold them both responsible and accountable.

    It is our hope that citizens can discuss issues here that are important to them and hopefully come up with a Proposition that can help produce the required change. We will gather your Propositions and votes and make sure they are delivered to the requested end point. We will then keep you informed of any correspondence.

This is YOUR country, what do YOU think?

    This comes from NationalProposition.com and you may want to check this website out.Speak whatever happens to be on your mind about our government and our wishes for that government!

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Senator Boxer's Comments Towards Condi Rice Draw Criticism

   You have all heard by now the 'howling'  by such astute people as Rush Limbaugh and a few of the  right leaning blogs over question's Senator Barbara Boxer posed to Miss Rice concerning who is going to pay for this Iraq war fiasco.

   Here is the question that Boxer asked:

"Now, the issue is who pays the price. Who pays the price? I’m not going to pay a personal price. My kids are too old and my grandchild is too young. You’re not going to pay a particular price, as I understand it, with immediate family. So who pays the price? The American military and their families."

    Ms. Boxer issued a statement to explain:

I spoke the truth at the Committee hearing, which is that neither Secretary Rice nor I have family members that will pay the price for this escalation. My point was to focus attention on our military families who continue to sacrifice because this Administration has not developed a political solution to the situation in Iraq.   

The New York Times Article

   Of course, the conservative bloggers were all over this story as were the radio and television talk show host.

    Here are a few examples courtesy of New York Times

Rush Limbaugh,“Here you have a rich white chick with a huge, big mouth, trying to lynch this — an African-American woman — right before Martin Luther King Day, hitting below the ovaries here.”

    Does he not sound as if he is trying to make this issue racial? That pig behind the microphone needs to get educated!

    Tony Snow, giving his opinion to Fox News, said,

"I don’t know if she was intentionally that tacky, but I do think it’s outrageous. Here you got a professional woman, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, and Barbara Boxer is sort of throwing little jabs because Condi doesn’t have children, as if that means that she doesn’t understand the concerns of parents. Great leap backward for feminism.”

   Ms. Boxer was right on the money with her intent! Miss Rice doesn't have any children so there is no way that she can understand what runs through a parents mind when it comes to their kids possibly getting killed for an oil war! Miss Rice's non-children won't risk death to fix this mess that the Idiot in Chief has gotten us into!

   Ms. Boxer did have some support from Ezra Klein who said,

Boxer’s comment is fits firmly within the rich history of attacks levied on the Bush administration and Congress for pursuing wars of choice despite lacking personal experience in combat or immediate family members exposed to its ravages. It’s a variant of the “chickenhawk” charge, not chauvinism.

   Many of the conservative assholes want Ms. Boxer to issue an apology for the comments that she made.

   Ms. boxer should tell these morons what they should go and do with themselves!

 

Technorati tags: ,

Bush,Iran,Iraq-For Your Reading Pleasure

    Because you need to know!

                           

    Bush's Iraq Plan - Goading Iran into War
    Analysis by Trita Parsi* Via IPS News

WASHINGTON, Jan 12 (IPS) - President George W. Bush's address on Iraq Wednesday night was less about Iraq than about its eastern neighbour, Iran. There was little new about the U.S.'s strategy in Iraq, but on Iran, the president spelled out a plan that appears to be aimed at goading Iran into war with the U.S.                              The Article

                                        * * * *

 

Republican Warns that Bush might Fake pretext to Iran Invasion [VIDEO]

   Via Alternet

Posted by Evan Derkacz January 12, 2007.

Doesn't matter if it's us or Israel...

 

ronpaul

 

While searching for the video of Jim McDermott using AlterNet's Joshua Holland articles I ran across this speech by Bush's fellow Texas Republican, Ron Paul, reacting to the speech.                      Original Article

    Please watch the video mentioned in the above article as it is very educational when it comes to our President and his love for the oil companies!

    I referred to this subject in a previous post. You can go HERE to read the article from The Independent

 

Technorati tags: , ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Senate Approves Bill Denying Pensions to Congressmen Convicted of Ethics Violations

    The Senate finally got a chance to do something right, and they did!

    The legislation passed by a vote of 87-0! Maybe if we get lucky it will be retro-active to some where around 2000.

                                            * * * *     

Bill strips ethics-challenged legislators of pensions
POSTED: 8:52 p.m. EST, January 12, 2007 at CNN

Sens. John Kerry, D-Massachusetts, and Ken Salazar, D-Colorado, attached the amendment to an ethics reform bill earlier this week.

"The only thing crazier than giving a member of Congress convicted of a crime a federal pension is the fact that we still need a bill to prevent a convict from receiving their pension," Salazar said at the time. "A member of Congress who abuses their position of authority for their personal profit deserves a prison sentence, not a government pension."

   This bill has to pass the House and be signed by President Bush. That's were there may be a problem.

 

Technorati tags: , ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Oil Companies Attack Legislation Designed To Cut Back Tax Incentives

    You knew that this one was coming because the last thing that the oil companies want is to have to pay all of the money that the Bush Crime Family has let them slip into their coffers.

   Money such as the $7 billion or so that they have screwed the tax payer out of with their leases  allowing them to pump billions of dollars worth of oil and gas from publicly owned waters without paying royalties to the government.

    Here is the oil companies argument against changing the leases, which are flawed.

    The New York Times

“This bill takes capital from U.S. oil and natural gas companies that otherwise would be spent on domestic energy exploration,” said Barry Russell, president of the Independent Petroleum Association of America, which represents about 5,000 smaller oil and gas producers. “If the goal is to lessen our dependence on foreign oil, then this bill falls far short.”    Entire Article

                                   * * * *

   As if the oil companies are seriously looking for alternative sources of energy!

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Democrats and Republicans Argue over Iraq Escalation

    A day after George Bush's speech was knocked to the ground by criticism from both Democrats and Republicans,Sen. John McCain ( bio, voting record), R-AZ., said that he supports Bush's plan. WOW! I am so surprised by that!

    From the Associated Press:

By ANNE FLAHERTY   January 13,2007

McCain said those advocating the start of a troop withdrawal, which includes many Democrats, "have a responsibility to tell us what they believe are the consequences of withdrawal in Iraq. If we walk away from Iraq, we'll be back, possibly in the context of a wider war in the world's most volatile region."

Rep. John Murtha (news, bio, voting record), a Pennsylvania Democrat who oversees military funding, said he will propose tying congressional approval of war funds to shutting the Guantanamo Bay military prison in Cuba. Other conditions he said he is considering include not extending troop deployments and giving soldiers and Marines more time to train between deployments.    Entire Article from AP

                                     * * * *

    Bush did an interview on CBS  "60 Minutes" which will air on Sunday in which," Asked if he believes he has the authority to send additional troops to Iraq no matter what Congress wants to do, Bush said: "I think I've got — in this situation, I do, yeah. And I fully understand they will ... they could try to stop me from doing it, but, uh, I've made my decision and we're going forward."

    My fellow Americans, it would seem as if our going to the polls in November and doing a 'changing of the guard' has not had any affect on our 'enlightened' leader. Not only is this incompetent fool ignoring the members of the House and the Senate, but more importantly, he is disregarding you and I, the voters!

    The American citizens of this country pay this bag of shit $400,000 a year to represent and to work for us. The president is supposed to look out for the publics best interest, not Halliburton's, or Exxon's!

    For Bush to willfully ignore and to disregard our views and stated position on the war in Iraq and stem cell research should be grounds for impeachment in its own right.               Michael d

 

Technorati tags: , , ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Friday, January 12, 2007

President Bush Is not The Decider

Molly Ivins, AlterNet., has an article up that might just get your dander up what with President Bush ignoring the American public and sending troops to Iraq anyway.

                                              * * * *

We are the people who run this country. We are the deciders and we need to raise hell.

A surge is not acceptable to the people in this country -- we have voted overwhelmingly against this war in polls (about 80 percent of the public is against escalation, and a recent Military Times poll shows only 38 percent of active military want more troops sent) and at the polls. We know this is wrong. The people understand, the people have the right to make this decision, and the people have the obligation to make sure our will is implemented.    Entire Article

 

Technorati tags: ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

U.S. Troops And Iraq Departure

    From Reuters:

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The United States could start withdrawing forces from Iraq this year if the additional troops being sent to Baghdad reduce violence significantly, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said on Friday.

"If these operations actually work you could begin to see a lightening of the U.S. footprint both in Baghdad and Iraq itself," Gates told the Senate Armed Services Committee

                                          * * * *

     You know that this all depends on the Iraqi Prime Minister, Nuri al-Maliki, keeping his promises and holding up to his end of the bargain with President Bush. The Democrats were quick to point out, rightfully so, that promises from the past have been broken and that it will more than likely be no different this time.

Sen. Carl Levin (D-MI): "Look at the track record of the Iraqi government in meeting some of its past benchmarks and promises."

   And then we have this from the AFP:

A senior ally of radical Iraqi cleric Moqtada al-Sadr warned that thousands of the planned 21,500 extra US troops en route for the war-torn nation would "go home in coffins."

"The American people have to prevent their sons from coming to Iraq or they may return in coffins," threatened Sheikh Abdel Razzaq al-Nadawi, a senior official in Sadr's movement, slamming the planned US troop increase.

   The Iraqi Prime Minister will no doubt bow down to the Sadr before he will bow down to Bush. Of course he will not say that publicly but he will show it by letting things go on the same way that they have been going. The Prime Minister's main worry is not Bush or the U.S., but it is the other groups that may kill him if he doesn't co-operate by being lenient.

 

Technorati tags: , ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com