Be INFORMED

Thursday, January 25, 2007

NIE Report will Undermine Case For Escalation

    Once a scammer, always a scammer! That would be the Bush Crime Family once again.

    Think Progress:

NPR’s Rehm: Delayed Iraq NIE Will Undermine Case For Escalation

Six months ago, Harper’s Ken Silverstein reported that “in spite of pressure from CIA analysts, intelligence czar John Negroponte was blocking a new National Intelligence Estimate (NIE) on Iraq.” National Intelligence Estimates present the consensus view of the U.S. intelligence apparatus. Despite pressure from Congress, the administration insisted it could not complete the NIE until January 2007.

Last week, however, an administration intelligence official told senators that the report is still not complete. According to Silverstein, Senate hearing attendees “believe that senior intelligence officials are stalling because an NIE will be bleak enough to present a significant political liability.”

Yesterday, NPR host Diane Rehm may have revealed why the NIE remains so politically sensitive. On her national radio show, Rehm said:

It’s my understanding that the National Intelligence Estimate…is going to suggest that adding troops is the wrong way to go, that it’s not going to improve the situation.

CLICK HERE FOR AUDIO

Yesterday, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), and the House and Senate intelligence committee chairmen wrote President Bush “urging prompt completion of a national intelligence estimate (NIE) on Iraq first requested by Congress six months ago.” Read the full letter HERE.

 

Technorati tags: ,

ACLU To Continue Push In Wiretap Lawsuit

   For the record, I am not a big fan of the ACLU but I do find a reason now and then to support their efforts such as the ACLU's lawsuit against the terrorist surveillance program created by the Bush Crime Family to spy on the fine citizens of the United States at will and without warrants.

   From The Associated Press

by LARA JAKES JORDAN, Associated Press Writer

WASHINGTON - The Bush administration sought on Thursday to drop its appeal of a federal court ruling that concluded the government's domestic spying program is unconstitutional, saying the entire issue is moot since the surveillance now is monitored by a secret court.

Responding, lawyers for the American Civil Liberties Union said they would continue to push for their day in court since President Bush retains authority to continue the warrantless spying program.       Entire Article

     The ACLU should be supported by all of us in this matter to make sure that Bushco stops this illegal use of wiretaps once and for all. they should not have the right to retain authority to do this at a later time. This is just another way to sneak the wiretaps back into action without any oversight!

 

Technorati tags: ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Attacking Iran Counter-Productive

Mohamed ElBaradei, director general of the International Atomic Energy Agency,  on Thursday said that attacking Iran would be counter-productive and would encourage Iran to build a nuclear bomb.   MORE HERE

    I guess that all of these hotshots keep forgetting what we have up in the White House! We have a 100% psychotic, delusional idiot as our President and he has yet to hear anyone when it comes to good advice.

   This piece of garbage wants an all out war in not just Iran and Iraq, but the entire middle east! The fool thinks that he's on a mission from God and those kind of people are the most dangerous kind on this planet!

    This punk and his minions have to go!

 

Technorati tags: ,

Sen. Warner Will not Negotiate On Iraq Resolution

Sen. John Warner ( R-Va.) says that he will not bargain with the Democrats over which resolution will be put forth to the President.

   As is par for the course, the resolution that Warner endorses is not as hard on Bush as is the resolution being put forth by the Democrats.

   I guess that Warner still harbors close feelings for Mr. Bush?

     From Yahoo News

Warner's resolution would put the Senate on record as opposing Bush's decision to send 21,500 more troops to Iraq. It leaves open the possibility that a small number of forces could be sent to the western Anbar Province, where al-Qaida members are believed to be operating.

The nonbinding measure is less critical than one approved Wednesday in a 12-9 vote by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. That resolution _ introduced by Sens. Joseph Biden (news, bio, voting record), D-Del., Carl Levin (news, bio, voting record), D-Mich., and Chuck Hagel (news, bio, voting record), R-Neb. _ states flatly that sending more troops into Iraq is "not in the national interest."

Amid the maneuvering, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (news, bio, voting record), D-Calif., and Rep. John Murtha (news, bio, voting record), D-Pa., led House members on a fact-finding trip to Iraq. And other Democrats attacked Vice President Dick Cheney for comments in a CNN interview Wednesday defending administration policy in Iraq.

"To have Vice President Cheney suggest that we have had a series of enormous successes in Iraq is delusional," said Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Ill.

 

Technorati tags: , ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Bush On Why The Escalation Will Work

  From CBS News

(The Politico) By The Politico's Josephine Hearn and Mike Allen.


House Speaker Nancy Pelosi said yesterday that President George W. Bush did not consult her before announcing his new strategy for the war in Iraq — a sign that, despite the cozy rhetoric, the relationship between Washington's two powerhouses has already had its share of friction.                                                                     In an interview, Pelosi also said she was puzzled by what she considered the president's minimalist explanation for his confidence in the new surge of 21,500 U.S. troops that he has presented as the crux of a new "way forward" for U.S. forces in Iraq.
"He's tried this two times — it's failed twice," the California Democrat said. "I asked him at the White House, 'Mr. President, why do you think this time it's going to work?' And he said, 'Because I told them it had to.' "              Entire Article

   I'm not sure about you, the reader. But I sure feel alot safer now!

 

Technorati tags: ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Ford Motor Post 4TH Quarter Loss

From the AP

DEARBORN, Mich. - Ford Motor Co. lost $5.8 billion in the fourth quarter amid slumping sales and huge restructuring costs, pushing the fabled automaker's deficit for the year to $12.7 billion, the largest in its 103-year history.

The fourth-quarter loss was the worst final-quarter loss in Ford's history and its second-worst quarterly performance. Ford lost $6.7 billion in the first quarter of 1992, due mainly to accounting rule changes on health care liabilities.

   It looks as if Bush's booming economy isn't so booming for the auto industry.

   Somewhat along the same lines, The New York Times reports:

WASHINGTON, Jan. 23 — A federal jury in Denver agreed Tuesday with a former top auditor for the Interior Department that the Kerr-McGee Corporation had cheated the government out of millions of dollars in royalties on oil it produced in publicly owned coastal waters.  

Under the False Claims Act, a law that was intended to encourage whistle-blowers, Kerr-McGee could be forced to pay more than $30 million — double or triple the original amount it owed, as well as penalties of up to $11,000 for each of 1,200 false statements that the company is accused of making in its royalty reports to the government.  Article

    Original Article

Bush Oil Reserve May Support Prices as Asia Also Buys
By Christian Schmollinger and Winnie Zhu
Bloomberg     Wednesday 24 January 2007

George W. Bush's decision to double the emergency oil stockpile in the U.S. may help to stem a six- month slide in prices as China, India and South Korea also add to demand by bolstering their defenses against shortages.

Oil gained the most since September 2005 yesterday after the U.S. Energy Department said it will boost the Strategic Petroleum Reserve to 1.5 billion barrels over 20 years. China, where imports rose 15 percent last year, began to fill its reserve in October. India also plans to double its inventories.

The U.S. plan "helps puts a floor in the market," said Antoine Halff, head of energy research at Fimat USA Inc. in New York. "It creates competition for the same barrels. It tightens the market on top of the strategic reserve builds elsewhere such as China."

Oil consumers are increasing stockpiles on concern that political instability in the Middle East, terrorism and hurricanes may cause supply disruptions. Governments may buy during dips in prices, supplementing demand growth that's forecast to slow this year by the International Energy Agency.

The U.S. move "will also alert China to be more aggressive in building up their strategic petroleum reserve," Gordon Kwan, Hong Kong-based China oil and gas research director at CLSA Ltd., said in an e-mailed strategy update. "Oil prices will likely extend their rebound heading into the summer driving season. $50 oil appears to be a solid floor."

   While more supply in the stockpile is a good thing, I have to wonder if Bush is doing this for the country or for the oil companies? He hasn't done much for the country so may bet is for the latter.

 

Technorati tags: ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Neocons and the Middle East,Minimum Wage Shot Down & Bush Still an Idiot!

   It's Thursday morning and here is some of the stories making the rounds for today!

   First off, we have Nellebracht over at DailyKos with a few thoughts on what the Bush Crime Family is really up to in Iraq and the rest of the middle east. As I've stated before on more than one occasion,it's all about the oil.

If this theory is correct, it allows us to make a few predictions.  The first is that the result of the surge will be to increase violence and division and not decrease it.  The second is that the US will continue its rhetoric against Iran, but will prefer to use its proxies in Israel and Saudi Arabia to instigate violence.  The final prediction I will make is that President Bush will withdraw most if not all American troops from Iraq before the end of his term.       The Article

       Of course, you may already know that GOP Senators blocked the federal minimum wage increase. The GOP wants tax cuts for small business included in the wage raise bill.

On a vote of 54-43, Democrats fell six short of the 60 needed to end debate and go to passage of a House-approved bill, to raise the minimum wage for the first time in a decade -- boosting it over two years to $7.25 per hour from $5.15.  Yahoo News

Congressional Budget Office says that the budget deficit will shrink this year, 3 years in a row, and that we could have a surplus by 2012 if Bush's tax cuts expire in 2010.              NYTimes Article

“Two years ago, the president laid out an ambitious goal to cut the deficit in half by 2009, and we met that goal three years early,” said Rob Portman, the White House budget director. “We are now on a solid path toward the president’s new goal to achieve a balanced budget by 2012.”                  But Congressional budget officials cautioned that the projections were not as sunny as they looked, in part because they assume that Congress will let President Bush’s tax cuts expire in 2010, along with many corporate tax breaks, and will not try to shield millions of families from a big increase in their tax bills because of the alternative minimum tax.

   Here's a nice little story  for your reading pleasure today.

   It looks as if our Idiot in Chief tried to get congressional approval to pretty much attack anyone in the middle east that he wanted to!

    From Think Progress

HAGEL: [F]inally, begrudgingly, [the White House] sent over a resolution for Congress to approve. Well, it was astounding. It said they could go anywhere in the region.

GQ: It wasn’t specific to Iraq?

HAGEL: Oh no. It said the whole region! They could go into Greece or anywhere. Is central Asia in the region? I suppose! Sure as hell it was clear they meant the whole Middle East. It was anything. It was literally anything. No boundaries. No restrictions.

GQ: They expected Congress to let them start a war anywhere in the Middle East?

HAGEL: Yes. Yes. Wide open. We had to rewrite it. Joe Biden, Dick Lugar, and I stripped the language that the White House had set up and put our language in it.

        Knowing the Bush history the way that many of us have for years, this is no surprise.

    Time to start your day!

    Remember! The only good Bush is a prosecuted Bush!

 

Technorati tags: , ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

Cheney's Interview With Wolf Blitzer

Vice President Dick Cheney when interviewed by CNN's Wolf Blitzer said:

BLITZER: What if the Senate passes a resolution saying, This is not good idea? Will that stop you?

CHENEY: It won't stop us. And it would be, I think, detrimental from the standpoint of the troops. As General Petraeus said yesterday

-- he was asked by Joe Lieberman, among others, in his testimony about this notion that somehow the Senate could vote overwhelmingly for him, send him on his new assignment and then pass a resolution at the same time, say, "But we don't agree with the mission you've been given."

BLITZER: You're moving forward, no matter what the Congress does.

CHENEY: We are moving forward. We are moving forward. The Congress has control over the purse strings. They have the right, obviously, if they want, to cut off funding. But, in terms of this effort, the president's made his decision. We've consulted extensively with them. We'll continue to consult with the Congress. But the fact of the matter is, we need to get the job done. I think General Petraeus can do it. I think our troops can do it. And I think it's far too soon for the talking heads on television to conclude that it's impossible to do, it's not going to work, it can't possibly succeed.                     Transcript

   So basically what Cheney said was that this administration is still 'stay the course' and that Bushco does not care what the American people,the House, or the Senate thinks!

    This is beginning to sound alot like 'dictator' to me.

    I say that the congress should begin impeachment proceedings and that they start with Condi Rice and work their way up the ladder.

 

Technorati tags: , ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Bush's Speech and Other News

      Iraq seems to be having a problem finishing their national petroleum law. It is hoped that this new long will bring all of the Iraqi factions together as they would be sharing in the profits from oil sales, but there are a few obstacles standing in the way.    The Washington Post for more.

                                        * * * *

Washington Post Foreign Service
Wednesday, January 24, 2007

BEIRUT, Jan. 23 -- The Hezbollah-led opposition cut roads in Beirut and across Lebanon with burning tires, uprooted trees, incinerated cars and barricades to enforce a strike Tuesday aimed at toppling the government, paralyzing the country and embarrassing Lebanese officials ahead of an international aid conference.   WaPo for more.

                           * * * *

I'm not even going to comment on what I think of Bush's State of the Union speech on Tuesday night as I have said enough about it after he was finished with it. You can click The New York Times for everyone else's opinion. If you do not like the NYT, then try here at U.S. News

                         * * * *

According to an exhaustive BBC poll, nearly three-quarters of those polled in 25 countries oppose the Bush policy on Iraq, and more than two-thirds believe the U.S. presence in the Middle East destabilizes the region.       Truthdig

                       * * * *

 

From BarryLando.com:

Between 1990 and 2003 hundreds of thousands of Iraqis—particularly children—were killed by another weapon of mass destruction—the U.N. embargo, pushed principally by the U.S and Britain. Its disastrous impact is still felt throughout Iraq

              Go HERE for more

 

Technorati tags: , ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

Jim Webb's Democratic Response

Response To President Bush's State Of The Union Address From Senator Jim Webb (D-VA):

Good evening.

I'm Senator Jim Webb, from Virginia, where this year we will celebrate the 400th anniversary of the settlement of Jamestown - an event that marked the first step in the long journey that has made us the greatest and most prosperous nation on earth.

It would not be possible in this short amount of time to actually rebut the President's message, nor would it be useful. Let me simply say that we in the Democratic Party hope that this administration is serious about improving education and healthcare for all Americans, and addressing such domestic priorities as restoring the vitality of New Orleans.

Further, this is the seventh time the President has mentioned energy
independence in his state of the union message, but for the first time this exchange is taking place in a Congress led by the Democratic Party. We are looking for affirmative solutions that will strengthen our nation by freeing us from our dependence on foreign oil, and spurring a wave of entrepreneurial growth in the form of alternate energy programs. We look forward to working with the President and his party to bring about these changes.

There are two areas where our respective parties have largely stood in
contradiction, and I want to take a few minutes to address them tonight. The first relates to how we see the health of our economy - how we measure it, and how we ensure that its benefits are properly shared among all Americans. The second regards our foreign policy - how we might bring the war in Iraq to a proper conclusion that will also allow us to continue to fight the war against international terrorism, and to address other strategic concerns that our country faces around the world.

When one looks at the health of our economy, it's almost as if we are living in two different countries. Some say that things have never been better. The stock market is at an all-time high, and so are corporate profits. But these benefits are not being fairly shared. When I graduated from college, the average corporate CEO made 20 times what the average worker did; today, it's nearly 400 times. In other words, it takes the average worker more than a year to make the money that his or her boss makes in one day.

Wages and salaries for our workers are at all-time lows as a percentage of national wealth, even though the productivity of American workers is the highest in the world. Medical costs have skyrocketed. College tuition rates are off the charts. Our manufacturing base is being dismantled and sent overseas. Good American jobs are being sent along with them.

In short, the middle class of this country, our historic backbone and our best hope for a strong society in the future, is losing its place at the table. Our workers know this, through painful experience. Our white-collar professionals are beginning to understand it, as their jobs start disappearing also. And they expect, rightly, that in this age of globalization, their government has a duty to insist that their concerns be dealt with fairly in the international marketplace.

In the early days of our republic, President Andrew Jackson established an important principle of American-style democracy - that we should measure the health of our society not at its apex, but at its base. Not with the numbers that come out of Wall Street, but with the living conditions that exist on Main Street. We must recapture that spirit today.

And under the leadership of the new Democratic Congress, we are on our way to doing so. The House just passed a minimum wage increase, the first in ten years, and the Senate will soon follow. We've introduced a broad legislative package designed to regain the trust of the American people. We've established a tone of cooperation and consensus that extends beyond party lines. We're working to get the right things done, for the right people and for the right reasons.

With respect to foreign policy, this country has patiently endured a mismanaged war for nearly four years. Many, including myself, warned even before the war began that it was unnecessary, that it would take our energy and attention away from the larger war against terrorism, and that invading and occupying Iraq would leave us strategically vulnerable in the most violent and turbulent corner of the world.

I want to share with all of you a picture that I have carried with me for more than 50 years. This is my father, when he was a young Air Force captain, flying cargo planes during the Berlin Airlift. He sent us the picture from Germany, as we waited for him, back here at home. When I was a small boy, I used to take the picture to bed with me every night, because for more than three years my father was deployed, unable to live with us full-time, serving overseas or in bases where there was no family housing. I still keep it, to remind me of the sacrifices that my mother and others had to make, over and over again, as my father gladly served our country. I was proud to follow in his footsteps, serving as a Marine in Vietnam. My brother did as well, serving as a Marine helicopter pilot. My son has joined the tradition, now serving as an infantry Marine in Iraq.

Like so many other Americans, today and throughout our history, we serve and have served, not for political reasons, but because we love our country. On the political issues - those matters of war and peace, and in some cases of life and death - we trusted the judgment of our national leaders. We hoped that they would be right, that they would measure with accuracy the value of our lives against the enormity of the national interest that might call upon us to go into harm's way.

We owed them our loyalty, as Americans, and we gave it. But they owed us - sound judgment, clear thinking, concern for our welfare, a guarantee that the threat to our country was equal to the price we might be called upon to pay in defending it.

The President took us into this war recklessly. He disregarded warnings from the national security adviser during the first Gulf War, the chief of staff of the army, two former commanding generals of the Central Command, whose jurisdiction includes Iraq, the director of operations on the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and many, many others with great integrity and long experience in national security affairs. We are now, as a nation, held hostage to the predictable - and predicted - disarray that has followed.

The war's costs to our nation have been staggering.Financially.The damage to our reputation around the world.The lost opportunities to defeat the forces of international terrorism.And especially the precious blood of our citizens who have stepped forward to serve.

The majority of the nation no longer supports the way this war is being fought; nor does the majority of our military. We need a new direction. Not one step back from the war against international terrorism. Not a precipitous withdrawal that ignores the possibility of further chaos. But an immediate shift toward strong regionally-based diplomacy, a policy that takes our soldiers off the streets of Iraq's cities, and a formula that will in short order allow our combat forces to leave Iraq.

On both of these vital issues, our economy and our national security, it falls upon those of us in elected office to take action.

Regarding the economic imbalance in our country, I am reminded of the situation President Theodore Roosevelt faced in the early days of the 20th century. America was then, as now, drifting apart along class lines. The so-called robber barons were unapologetically raking in a huge percentage of the national wealth. The dispossessed workers at the bottom were threatening revolt.

Roosevelt spoke strongly against these divisions. He told his fellow Republicans that they must set themselves "as resolutely against improper corporate influence on the one hand as against demagogy and mob rule on the other." And he did something about it.

As I look at Iraq, I recall the words of former general and soon-to-be President Dwight Eisenhower during the dark days of the Korean War, which had fallen into a bloody stalemate. "When comes the end?" asked the General who had commanded our forces in Europe during World War Two. And as soon as he became President, he brought the Korean War to an end.

These Presidents took the right kind of action, for the benefit of the American people and for the health of our relations around the world. Tonight we are calling on this President to take similar action, in both areas. If he does, we will join him. If he does not, we will be showing him the way. Thank you for listening. And God bless America.

 

Technorati tags: , ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

The Bush State of the Union

   It is apparent that Bush has changed his subjects a little in this coming speech. everything that he has chosen to highlight such as healthcare reform and energy, are things which will appeal to the Democrats.

   I seriously doubt if they are going to bite into his bi-partisan bullshit though. This speech as like everything else from this chimp, something to say to take the focus off of his failure in Iraq.

   Let us not be sucked into his rhetoric any longer! He has nothing new to offer the American people! He never has, he never will!

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

President Bush's Agenda For Spreading Hope And Opportunity In America

   Does that title not sound sweet? What a crock !

    HERE is an outline of President Bush's State of the Union speech tonight.

    After looking at this, I have come to believe that Bush wants to be a Democrat deep down inside! After all, everything on this list are things that the Democrats have been pushing for quite some time.

    I remember, in a time not so long ago, that the Republicans were always saying that the Democrats had no vision and no ideas. Look at the GOP now! They have taken to using the Democrats 'no ideas' and the Democrats 'no vision' because they are the ones who have no vision or ideas!  MY,MY,MY!

                                * * * *

In The State Of The Union Address, President Bush Will Discuss A Domestic Agenda Including:

Energy:President Bush will ask Congress and America's scientists, farmers, industry leaders, and entrepreneurs to join
him in pursuing the goal of reducing U.S. gasoline usage by 20 percent in the next ten years – Twenty in Ten.

Health Care: President Bush will announce his proposals to make basic, private health insurance available and affordable for more Americans.

Spending Reform: President Bush will discuss three major reforms to spend taxpayer dollars wisely: balancing the budget through pro-growth policies and spending restraint, enacting common-sense reforms to help prevent billions of
taxpayer dollars from being spent on unnecessary earmarks, and reforming entitlement programs.
Education: President Bush will discuss his priorities for strengthening and reauthorizing the No Child Left Behind Act) this year.
Immigration: President Bush will call on Congress to pass a  comprehensive immigration reform bill that will secure our borders, enhance interior and worksite enforcement, create a temporary worker program, resolve – without animosity and without amnesty – the status of illegal immigrants already here, and promote assimilation into our society.
Judges: The President has a duty to nominate qualified men and women to fill vacancies on the Federal bench, and he calls on the Senate to give those nominees a fair hearing and a prompt up-or-down vote.

War On Terror/Iraq: The challenge playing out across the broader Middle East is more than a military conflict – "it is the decisive ideological struggle of our time." For the safety of our people, America must succeed in Iraq, and the President believes his new Iraq plan is the best way to succeed. Tonight, the President will propose to establish a special advisory council on the War on Terror made up of leaders in Congress from both political parties.

   Just from the excerpts of the speech that I have read, I can say that this is just more bullshit from Bush!

                                                   * * * *

   I put a section of the above paragraph in parenthesis to point out the same old line from Bushco. We have heard this time and time again and it is getting a little tiring! Another advisory council? That is just what we need now! Another group to make recommendations to the Bush character just so that he can ignore them!

    The biggest struggle of our time is getting rid of President (?) Bush!

 

Technorati tags: , , ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Monday, January 22, 2007

Latest CBSNews Poll On Bush Approval

   So tomorrow night some of us poor politics watchers will have to (OH! THE PAIN!) actually sit down and watch President Bush deliver his State of the Union address.

   According to the latest CBSNews, Bush is not doing so well with the American public. His approval rating is now down to just 28% will those who disapprove is at 64%. This is a new low for Mr. Bush. Of course, that is only in his ratings as I am sure that he will reach all kinds of new lows in the near future!

SHOULD U.S. SEND 20,000 MORE TROOPS TO IRAQ?

Favor
29%
Oppose
66%

…if it increased U.S.’ chances for success?

Favor
53%
Oppose
38%   

However, Americans aren't convinced the U.S. needs a troop increase to achieve its goals in Iraq. Just 26 percent think that's needed, about the same number that think those goals can be reached without sending in more troops.

Forty-one percent think the U.S. can't achieve its goals regardless of troop levels.   CBSNews

     Complete poll results are HERE!

   I'll bet that if they did this poll with canines, Bush would not fare well there either.

 

Technorati tags: , ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Passports for Mexico,Canada,Caribbean Now Necessary

    You must remember that beginning on Tuesday  you better have a passport with you if you plan on flying to Mexico, Canada and the Caribbean. You will need your passport to get back into the United States. Your driver license or birth certificate will no longer do. 

    There are a few exemptions. Also note that those of you traveling by land or sea do not have to concern yourselves with this until January,2008.

 

Technorati tags: , ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Republicans Show Some Backbone,Iran Conducts Missile Test

    It looks as if some the Republicans are starting to grow some backbone as of late when it comes to opposing Bush's plans for Iraq. On Monday some of the  GOP voiced their distaste for Bush's plan while other said that the administration and the government of Iraq should be more accountable for the war.

Sen. Susan Collins(R-ME.) :

"We've had four other surges since we first went into Iraq. None of them produced a long-lasting change in the situation on the ground.So I am very skeptical that this surge would produce the desired outcome."    YahooNews

    In conjunction, both sides have drafted their respective non-binding resolutions disagreeing with bush's plans.

   Of course, in the true spirit of ignorance and stupidity, Bush will continue to ignore everyone except for his pet dog.

                                     * * * *

   Iran  did some testing of their own today with some missiles and at the same time stepped up their warning to their public to be prepared for an attack by the United States.

    They also barred 38 U.N. nuclear inspectors from the country because of sanctions imposed on them last month.

    Things just keep getting better over in the middle east, have you noticed? It looks as if George Bush and the rest of the Crime Family are pretty intent on starting even more shit over there!

   It is about time that the new House and Senate begin looking into impeachment of this president and his cohorts instead of just passing some non-binding resolutions!

 

Technorati tags: ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

White House Liars Back To Spin Once Again

   When you read the news reports in the papers or on the Internet especially, you get nothing but stories on who said what on the Sunday news shows. Talking about "Fox News Sunday" and all the rest.

   Lets us look at Dick Cheney on "Fox News Sunday" last week passing along his usual crap about Iraq and saying that critics of the administration were aiding Al-Qaeda. He is still passing along the same old shit that he was doling out back in 2003, minus the WMD spin.

   Cheney's appearance last week on Fox illustrates that so far as this White House is concerned, lying is still king!

Asked by Chris Wallace about the White House's decision to overrule commanders who recommended against a troop escalation, the vice president said, "I don't think we've overruled the commanders." He claimed we've made "enormous progress" in Iraq. He said the administration is not "embattled." (Well, maybe that one is denial.)  TruthOut

   When Bush was on CBS "60 Minutes" he had his story down pat also. At least he thinks that he did.

This White House gang is so practiced in lying with a straight face that it never thinks twice about recycling its greatest hits. Hours after Mr. Cheney's Fox interview, President Bush was on "60 Minutes," claiming that before the war "everybody was wrong on weapons of mass destruction" and that "the minute we found out" the W.M.D. didn't exist he "was the first to say so." Everybody, of course, was not wrong on W.M.D., starting with the United Nations weapons inspection team in Iraq. Nor was Mr. Bush the first to come clean once the truth became apparent after the invasion. On May 29, 2003 - two days after a secret Defense Intelligence Agency-sponsored mission found no biological weapons in trailers captured by American forces - Mr. Bush declared: "We found the weapons of mass destruction. We found biological laboratories."      The Article

   So once again we are seeing nothing but more bullshit from the Bush Crime Family and their never ending fantasy story! Speaking for myself, it is time that this group of idiots be stopped. Congress can stop this Iraq crap dead in its tracks if they choose to do so. So can we, the American public. Most of you help put these assholes in office! Now it is time to put them back in their rightful places, the gutter!

 

Technorati tags: , ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Sunday, January 21, 2007

Sanctity of Human Life Day

    I could not pass this up from DailyKos:

'Life' is just a four letter word

by Plutonium Page Sun Jan 21, 2007 at 02:50:50 PM PST

Today is a very special day for Mister Bush.  He has declared January 21, 2007 "National Sanctity of Human Life Day".  Check it out, right there on the White House website, a nice, pretty little message.

I filled in the blanks.   Must See

    No comment is needed by me.

 

Technorati tags: ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

John McCain Not Favoring General Casey for Position

Senator John McCain(R-AZ. voting record) said Sunday on NBC's "Meet The Press" that he does not think that he will vote for General George W. Casey as the Army chief of staff because he does not care for the way that Casey has handled the Iraq war.

   Sen.McCain:

    "I have very serious concerns about General Casey's nomination. I'm concerned about failed leadership, the message that sends to the rest of the military."       YahooNews

    McCain has some issues! Has the public not noticed how much he is starting to look like George Bush more and more each day?

Some of McCain's past votes:

Voted NO on investigating contract awards in Iraq & Afghanistan.

To establish a special committee of the Senate to investigate the awarding and carrying out of contracts to conduct activities in Afghanistan and Iraq and to fight the war on terrorism. Voting YES would: create Senate special committee to investigate war contracts, taking into consideration: bidding, methods of contracting, subcontracting, oversight procedures, allegations of wasteful practices, accountability and lessons learned in Afghanistan and Iraq.

Reference: Committee to Investigate War Contracts; Bill S Amdt 2476 to S 1042 ; vote number 2005-316 on Nov 10, 2005

                                  * * * *

Voted NO on allowing all necessary force in Kosovo.

Majority Leader Trent Lott motioned to kill the resolution that would have authorized the president to "use all necessary forces and other means," in cooperation with U.S. allies to accomplish objectives in Yugoslavia.
Status: Motion to Table Agreed to Y)78; N)22

Reference: Motion to table S. J. Res. 20; Bill S. J. Res. 20 ; vote number 1999-98 on May 4, 1999

                                * * * *

Conclusions on Iran and North Korea are all classified.

McCain signed the Report of the Commission on Intelligence on WMDs:

IRAN AND NORTH KOREA: MONITORING THE DEVELOPMENT OF NUCLEAR CAPABILITIES
The Commission carefully studied the Intelligence Community's capability to assess accurately the nuclear programs of Iran and North Korea. In doing so, we reviewed numerous intelligence reports and conducted interviews with Intelligence Community analysts, collectors, and supervisors, as well as policymakers and non-governmental regional and weapons experts. Because even the most general statements about the Intelligence Community's capabilities in this area are classified, the Commission's assessments and eleven specific findings cannot be discussed in this report. The Commission has, however, incorporated the lessons learned from its study of Iran and North Korea in all of our recommendations for reform of the Intelligence Community.

Source: Report to the President on WMDs, p.305 05-WMD-13 on Mar 31, 2005       The Source

    It would seem that the only thing that McCain has been on the other side of the fence with as far as Bush is concerned, was his "send more troops" in which, at the time, he was correct.

 

Technorati tags: ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

'It's So Irresponsible That They Can't Be Quiet For Six Or Nine Months': Comments From Weekly Standard Editor Will Kristol

Think Progress | Posted January 21, 2007 01:23 PM

This morning on Fox News, Weekly Standard editor William Kristol said that opponents of escalation in Congress are “leap-frogging each other in the degrees of irresponsibility they’re willing to advocate.” Kristol said, “It’s just unbelievable. … It’s so irresponsible that they can’t be quiet for six or nine months,” adding, “You really wonder, do they want it to work or not? I really wonder that.”

NPR’s Juan Williams told Kristol his analysis was “totally ahistorical,” and pointed out that yesterday was the deadliest day for U.S forces in Iraq in two years. “There’s something going on here you might pay attention to as opposed to just the politics of, ‘If you don’t support this president, you don’t really want us to win.’”     Video Here

   Leave it to Fox News to invite someone to the show who would pretty much spout out Fox News Right Wing rhetoric! Same old shit without even a new twist to it!

    It's a good thing that Fox News still has a couple of loyal viewers or else they'd have no-one to talk to! The Democrats do want  to win this sham of a war if it is still possible, but, I think they would also like to see a real game-plan and not some re-packaging of the same old song-and-dance.

   Hey, since I'm on the Fox News channel's bullshit, go check out this link.

    But Wait! There's More!

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

 

 

 

 

The Outlook For Iraq

   Middle East historian David Fromkin sees Iraq as breaking apart.Saad al-Hadithi from Baghdad University said,"Bleak."

By CHARLES J. HANLEY, AP Special Correspondent

  "At the moment," said the British historian Niall Ferguson,"a happy ending has a 1-in-100 look about it."      The Article

In interviews with The Associated Press, few experts see much chance that President Bush's plan to add 21,500 troops to the U.S. force in Baghdad and western Iraq will suppress either the anti-U.S. insurgency or the bloody underground warfare between Sunni and Shiite Muslims, or induce a political settlement among the Sunni, Shiite and Kurdish factions.     

       Let's get this right, okay? The experts say that Bush's scheme has no chance. The generals that Bush said he listens to said this will not work.So what does he do? He fires them and gets a few brown-nosers to go along with him. The American public tells him that they do not like his plans thus far and they most certainly do not care for his new 'stay the course'.

   This man claims to listen to a higher voice. That must be someone taller than he is because it sure isn't God. John Hagee maybe, or Pat Robertson?

   The United States Military is fucked in Iraq because of this butt-wipe and when he attacks Iran they will be even more screwed!

 

  

Ads by AdGenta.com

 

   

Maliki told Bush To Withdraw From Baghdad

By Michael Abramowitz and Peter Baker

Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, January 21, 2007

Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki had a surprise for President Bush when they sat down with their aides in the Four Seasons Hotel in Amman, Jordan. Firing up a PowerPoint presentation, Maliki and his national security adviser proposed that U.S. troops withdraw to the outskirts of Baghdad and let Iraqis take over security in the strife-torn capital. Maliki said he did not want any more U.S. troops at all, just more authority.

The president listened intently to the unexpected proposal at their Nov. 30 meeting, according to accounts from several administration officials. Bush seemed impressed that Maliki had taken the initiative, but it did not take him long to reject the idea.    Entire Article

   As is usual, the 'decider/divider' ignored the Iraqi Prime Minister as he does with everyone else! What happened to 'if they ask us to leave then we will'?

   Must be hard to overcome your greed for oil and all of the cash that it brings in. Bush doesn't want someone else to look smarter than he is but he fails to understand that even a snail on drugs can beat him at the I.Q. table.

 

Technorati tags: , , ,

   

Ads by AdGenta.com

Troop Escalation is under way

   As U.S. troops were getting killed in Iraq on Saturday, 3,200 more arrived to take their place according to the BBC.

    Maybe we can all talk Bush into going to Iraq himself and helping our troops out. Whatever happened to 'lead by example'?

                                * * * *

    Here's one from The Huffington Post which contains a few bits of Iraqi Prime Minister Maliki's diary which was found in a dumpster.

 

Bill Katovsky   Bio

01.19.2007

Nouri al-Maliki's Secret Diary

December 1, 2006
Reluctantly agreed to do the Amman press conference, but backed out of dinner with W. So it was all smiles and handshakes and camera flashes going off and "I'm the right guy for the job." So why did that jackal's national security house boy Hadley ridicule me in his leaked memo to the Zionist rag NY Times.

Can't trust W. Never did like to break bread with him anyway. He eats with his mouth open. A Texas cowboy. Total kafir.                     Huffington Post article

      This goes to show that we have a president with no class whatsoever.

   For those of you,myself included, who do not know what a 'kafir' is:

Kafir (Arabic: كافر kāfir; plural كفّار kuffār) is an Arabic word meaning an unbeliever, a person who hides, denies, or covers the truth. In cultural terms, it is a derogatory term[1] used to describe an unbeliever, non-Muslims, a Muslim of a differing sect, or an apostate from Islam. It is usually translated into English as "infidel" or "unbeliever".    Wikipedia

 

 

Technorati tags: , ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

                                  

 

An $8 Billion A Month War In Iraq

Pentagon sees U.S. war cost in Iraq rising
Fri Jan 19, 2007
By Richard Cowan     Reuters Article

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The steadily rising Iraq war price tag will reach about $8.4 billion a month this year, Pentagon spokesmen said on Thursday, as heavy replacement costs for lost, destroyed and aging equipment mount.

The Pentagon has been estimating last year's costs for the increasingly unpopular war at about $8 billion a month, having increased from a monthly "burn rate" of around $4.4 billion during the first year of fighting in fiscal 2003.

During testimony at a House Budget Committee hearing, Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England said that nearly four years into the war, the Pentagon's war costs were rising because it was having to replace big-ticket items such as helicopters, airplanes and armored vehicles that are wearing out or were lost in combat.

"We have a backlog and are seeing an increase," England told the panel.

When factoring in U.S. combat costs in Afghanistan, the Pentagon will spend about $9.7 billion a month during the fiscal year that ends on Sept. 30, according to Pentagon spokesmen.

Early next month, the administration is expected to ask Congress for a further $100 billion in "emergency" war money, on top of the $70 billion already approved for this year. The request comes as President George W. Bush has sketched out an increase of 21,500 U.S. troops in Iraq that could cost about $5.6 billion.

House Budget Committee Chairman John Spratt, a South Carolina Democrat, said he hoped Congress could avoid recurring emergency funding bills for the war. "We would like to get a better grasp of the cost of the Iraq war and the global war on terrorism -- a way of accounting of costs to date and projecting costs to come."

Since fiscal 2001, Congress has approved $503 billion to pay for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and other aspects of the U.S. "global war on terrorism," according to Congressional Budget Office testimony. Of that, $344 billion has gone for military, diplomatic and other security costs in Iraq, the CBO said.

                                            * * * *

    $8 billion a month? That is alot of cash for something that we cannot do right. We have no good results coming from this waste of the taxpayers hard-earned money. At least 3,033 of our troops have died for this ' gamble.'

 

Technorati tags: , , ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Saturday, January 20, 2007

Bush State Of The Union Speech

      The President's State of the Union speech comes up on Tuesday, giving him one more chance to convince both the public and the House and Senate that his plan for Iraq is the right plan. He will, no doubt, wish to 'stay the course' in his speech and he will not give in to any idea's but his own.

    As was with his childhood, he is a sore loser and he will not give up even if he knows that he is wrong. He is just attempting to change the rules a little bit but with the same outcome as before.

   The Democrat's do not support an 'escalation' and many Republicans do not either. Other GOP members are trying to get out from under the Bush fiasco as they clearly understand that they will not be re-elected in 2008 if they stick with the Bush rhetoric.

    It is being suggested by former speech writers that Bush needs to be more forceful, blunt or combative in his speech to rebuff both his critics and the Democrats.

    White House deputy press secretary Dana Perino:

"President Bush will discuss his determination to defeat the terrorists who are part of a broader extremist movement that is now doing everything it can to defeat us in Iraq. If the extremists prevail in Iraq, the American people will be less safe and our enemies will be emboldened and more lethal."                     Yahoo News Article

Bush probably will try to link the war to the threat to America since the Sept. 11 attacks because fighting terrorism has such widespread appeal, said Bruce Riedel, a former official at the National Security Council and analyst at the liberal Brookings Institution.

"Fear is a commodity that the administration has sold before, and right now they're not having much success with the public or the Congress with the arguments they've trotted out on the (troop) surge," said Ridel.

   So it looks as if the 'fear card' will be taking the spotlight once again. This time around we will really get to see if the public is still so ignorant and stupid as to listen to anything this sack of shit says!

 

Technorati tags: , , ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

U.S. Wants Radar Base In Czech Republic

PRAGUE, Czech Republic - The United States has asked the Czech Republic to host a radar base that would be part of a global missile defense system, the prime minister announced Saturday, drawing a warning from Russia of retaliatory actions.           Yahoo News

Independent defense experts have said the ground-based missile defense system is still years from being able to protect against long-range missile attacks.

                                             * * * *

    As if Russia is going to allow this base so close to home! More of the fantasy that Ronald Reagan started with his Stars Wars weapons system!

    So I take it that our government would then have to start the draft again just to guard the workers who would be building this station?

 

Technorati tags: , ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

 

Troop Death Toll Climbs

   The  Associated Press reports that 20 personnel were killed in military operations on Saturday in Iraq. This is after the 2 that were killed on Friday.

    13 were killed when an U.S. Army helicopter went down northeast of Baghdad. the military hasn't determined the cause of the crash.

    From Yahoo News:

An attack Saturday night blamed on militiamen in the city of Karbala killed five soldiers. Roadside bombs killed another soldier in the capital and one in Nineveh province north of Baghdad.

   ....and yet President(?) Bush still does not get it. It must be great to be a coward and still send others to their deaths!

         IMPEACH BUSH NOW!!

 

Technorati tags:

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

 

 

The Democrats Are Getting Verbal

   It looks as if the Democrats are beginning to grow some backbone!

Sen.John D. Rockefeller IV  said of George Bush.

“To be quite honest, I’m a little concerned that it’s Iraq again. This whole concept of moving against Iran is bizarre.”

"I don't think he understands the world. I don't think he's particularly curious about the world. I don't think he reads like he says he does. Every time he reads something he tells you about it, I think."       NYTimes

 

    Yes,and what would you expect from this idiot? This asswipe has never cared about anything outside of his eyesight and even that is debatable. President Bush has had his head buried up his ass since childbirth and he has never had any initiative for anything other than failure. I'd be surprised if he could tell you anything about Vietnam without having someone make notes for him!

   Stay tuned for Iraq 2:Iran!

 

Technorati tags: ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Honda Aircraft Co. is okay for Greensboro

    This report comes from the state of North Carolina, city of Greensboro. This is where I happen to reside.

    The county here (Guilford) has been trying to land Honda Aircraft Co. small jet plant to be built at Piedmont Triad International Airport. That's no big deal since this area could definitely use the employment.

    Honda, as do most companies' in this day and age, wants a few tax incentives from the city,county,as well as the city of High Point and Winston-Salem.

    News&Record

The new company is seeking a total of $1.2 million in economic incentives from the county and the city of Greensboro, as well as $100,000 from the city of High Point and $100,000 from a group in Winston-Salem, commissioners said. Honda would employ 300 people at an average $72,000-a-year salary, commissioners said.

Honda Aircraft announced last summer that it would open its headquarters at PTI, but the big prize — a manufacturing operation — was still to be determined.        Entire Article

   I think that it is in the best interest of the cities involved to approve the economic tax incentives that Honda is seeking. This is as long as the cities and the county do not go nuts with the incentives like they did with Dell ($242 million with state incentives and $37 million from Winston-Salem)

   We already have the Honda headquarters so now let's go get the manufacturing facility also!

 

Technorati tags: , ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

 

The Military's Role As Oil Protection Service

   This interesting story come from Alternet and it looks at the way that the United States is increasingly using its military to police oil pipelines and to secure Americas flow of oil by what ever means needed. That would, in my opinion,include attacking Iraq and the future attack on Iran.

The Article

A View From The citizens Of Iran

   Vice Idiot Dick Cheney is using the old line that if we attack Iran, the citizens of the country will rise up against their government and help the Americans.

   Ali G. Scotten,of the Christian Science Monitor, has been to Iran and says that even though the majority of Iranian citizens think highly of Americans, they would more than likely defend their government.

   Read it here

 

Technorati tags: ,

   

Ads by AdGenta.com