Saturday, April 07, 2007

New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani's Ugly Past before 9/11

   The following is a look at the Giuliani way of life before he became an over-rated 9/11 icon. This man could be an even more disastrous president than George Bush could ever hope to be.

From Human Rights Watch.

New York is enjoying a dramatic drop in violent crime, with some attributing it to the police department's emphasis on more minor, "quality of life," crimes, such as graffiti, squeegee windshield washing, and subway turnstile-jumping, pursued as a way to demonstrate control of the streets and to apprehend individuals who may have outstanding arrest warrants against them.


Police abuse experts have wondered why, if the police leadership is eager to stop crime by aggressively pursuing minor criminals and crimes, it is failing to demonstrate the same aggressiveness in dealing with officers before they commit more serious offenses.

   The rest of this is crossposted from Daily Kos and My Blog and Op-ed news.

In 1997 the Giuliani dichotomy of being tough on civilians who commit minor offense and light on police who abuse their authority gradually began to be exposed and led to several tragic incidents.  

First there was the wrongful arrest, torture and sexual abuse of Abner Louima by NYPD officers who mistakenly thought he had insulted one of them outside of a night club.  

A federal court jury in Brooklyn convicted three New York City cops March 6 of conspiring to cover up the 1997 station house torture of Haitian immigrant Abner Louima.  

Thomas Weise and Thomas Bruder each face five years in prison on the charge of conspiracy to obstruct a federal investigation into the savage assault on Louima. The third cop, Charles Schwarz, was convicted in a previous trial as an accomplice with Justin Volpe in torturing the immigrant worker inside the bathroom of the 70th Precinct in the Flatbush section of Brooklyn.  

Volpe, convicted of sodomizing Louima with a broken piece of a broomstick, tearing a one-inch hole in his rectum and bladder, was sentenced to 30 years in prison. Schwarz, who was found guilty of holding Louima down during the attack, faces up to a life sentence.  

The three cops greeted the verdict with disbelief and rage. "They're f—-ing liars; this is f—-ing bullshit," exclaimed Schwarz, who turned his wrath on his lawyer. As he was taken back into custody he slammed the wall and shouted out other obscenities.  

Let me point out again that Louima wasn't even the guy they were looking for in the first place!  This kind of brutality doesn't just happen, there has to be a permissive attitude in play at the department in order for anyone - let alone several officers - to believe that kidnapping and assaulting someone this way, not to mention intimidating witness and the victim to "keep quiet" could possibly work.  

And how did Rudy react at the time? (From Human Rights Watch)  

In August 1997, after the alleged torture of Haitian immigrant Abner Louima by police officers made national headlines and outraged city residents, the anti-crime record of the mayor and police department was tarnished. In uncharacteristic fashion, Mayor Rudolph Giuliani and Police Commissioner Howard Safir condemned the officers implicated in the incident as well as those who reportedly did nothing to stop it or report it.2 These were welcome condemnations, but conflicted with the mayor's persistent and seemingly automatic defense of officers accused of abusive treatment - even when he lacked a factual basis to do so - in his first term.  

So did Rudy then take decisive steps to correct the problem? Not really.  

Even when the mayor himself asked a task force to review police-community issues following the alleged beating and torture of Abner Louima, he immediately criticized the task force's majority report: "Some of the things [recommended] we've already done. Some of the things I've opposed in the past, I'll continue to oppose them. And some of the things are unrealistic and make very little sense."

Two years after Louima, another high profile police misconduct case landed on Rudy's lap - the murder of Amadou Diallo.

In February 1999, four New York City policemen searching for a rape suspect knocked on Amadou Diallo's door to question him. When he came to the door he reached inside his jacket, at which point the officers shot at him 41 times, hitting him with 19 bullets. The object Diallo was reaching for turned out to be his wallet.

Many New Yorkers were incensed and began to raise cries of W.W.B. - "Walking While Black!"  

In New York City under Rudy Giuliani, we have seen the terrible resurgence of officially condoned police racism. Not long ago, a black cast member of a Broadway play was arrested and held overnight, missing his performance. Like Diallo, his only "crime" was that of being a black man in his own building at a time when it came under police attention. Ask any young black man in New York City, neatly dressed teenager or even a computer consultant wearing a suit, how many times he has been stopped and harassed by the police.  


Giuliani's first Mayoral campaign began in a police riot, which no-one today remembers. The cops were demonstrating in front of City Hall, then inhabited by a black mayor, David Dinkins. Giuliani stood on the steps and delivered a speech so incendiary that the cops, many of them already drunk, began beating journalists and blocking traffic on the Brooklyn Bridge. It is heavily ironic that Giuliani no longer permits demonstrations on the steps of City Hall.  

After Diallo, there was also the case of shooting of Patrick Dorismond:  

On March 16, 2000, an undercover New York City narcotics officer approached Haitian-American Patrick Dorismond to solicit marijuana. Dorismond reportedly grew upset at officer's request, and scuffled with Detective Anthony Vasquez, who fatally shot Dorismond. Dorismond was later found to not have any drugs or weapons on him.

As he had done before, Giuliani blamed the victim.  

Before Patrick Dorismond's body was cold, the Giuliani administration launched an obscene campaign to vilify the dead security guard and all but portray him as someone who had a police bullet coming to him. Having little to work with, Giuliani ordered Police Commissioner Safir to unseal a juvenile record on the man, disclosing that he had been arrested for robbery and assault in 1987, when he was 13.  

The charge, reportedly stemming from a childhood fist fight over a quarter, was dropped and his record sealed because he was a child. But Giuliani's legal advisers took the position that once he was dead, Dorismond's right not to have police records from his childhood publicized by the mayor died with him. It allowed Giuliani to declare that Dorismond was no "altar boy" and that his previous brush with the police "may justify, more closely, what the police officer did."

As for the cop who shot the security guard, Giuliani praised him for his "distinguished" career as an undercover officer, declaring that in going out and shooting an innocent, unarmed man to death in the street he "put his life on the line in the middle of the night to protect the safety and security of this city."

But then 9/11 happened and washed all this away from our collective memories, remaking Rudy into a brand new Golden Boy ™ for the G.O.P.  

He became a key speaker at the G.O.P's 2004 Presidential Convention even while NYPD officers continued their suppression tactics and even engaged in political espionage.  Milking the situation for every ounce of juice Rudy wrote to the Republican faithful in an RNC mass-mailing on the eve of the 2004 elections repeating what he'd stated on the Convention floor.  

On September 11, our nation faced the worst attack in our history.  

On that day, we had to confront reality. Our people were brave in their response.  

At the time, we believed we would be attacked many more times that day and in the days that followed. Spontaneously, I grabbed the arm of then Police Commissioner Bernard Kerik and said to Bernie, "Thank God George Bush is our President." I've been saying that every day since.  

We needed George Bush then; we need him now; and we need him for four more years!  

That conversation has since been shown to have been a complete fabrication, while Bernard Kerik who Giuliani had been pushing as the new head of Homeland Security has since been unceremoniously tossed off the bus in the wake of ethics issues and alleged ties to organized crime.  

Skip forward to the here and now.  

I have recounted all the above in such detail in order to provide context for what may be some of the most chilling aspects of Rudy Giuliani radical authoritarianism to be yet revealed : His belief in absolute Presidential Authority.

From Glenn Greenwald.  

Rudy was asked about the Iraq supplemental. He said he finds it "irresponsible and dangerous." Then he began to muse about, after a veto, "would the president have the constitutional authority to support them [the troops], anyway?" He said he's a lawyer so he wouldn't offer an opinion "off the top of his head," then he proceeded to do just that.

He seemed to suggest that Bush could fund the Iraq war without Congress providing funding, but it was confusing. In an interview with a New Hampshire TV reporter after his remarks, he seemed more categorical and said, since the war had been authorized by Congress, the president has "the inherent authority to support the troops." But he added, "You have to ask a constitutional lawyer."  

Glenn Greenwald is a Constitutional Lawyer, and he's not down with this.

Not only does Rudy believe that the President has some magic ability to fund a War on his own (ala Iran/Contra) but he also believes that the President has the authority to imprison American Citizens without charges, justification or review.  

This view flies totally in the fact of Hamdi v Rumsfeld which clearly called for Judicial Review in such cases:  

It would turn our system of checks and balances on its head to suggest that a citizen could not make his way to court with a challenge to the factual basis for his detention by his government, simply because the Executive opposes making available such a challenge. Absent suspension of the writ by Congress, a citizen detained as an enemy combatant is entitled to this process.  

Following Hamdi the 109th Congress via the MCA effectively suspended the writ for foreign combatants - but it did not suspend habeas corpus for U.S. Citizens and the President certainly does not have that power independent of Congressional authority.  

Giuliani may simply be confused on this point - but I doubt it since also think the President has the inherent power to defy the will of Congress.  

In fact, it may well be this very long and clearly defined authoritarian streak of Giuliani's that is making him the darling of the Neo-Con Sect, causing them to brush aside his pro-abortion, pro-gay stances even among the deepest, darkest hearted of the red-staters. Especially among them.  

For you see, they love nothing so much as a whip-cracking, brutal authoritarian in those parts.  Just listen to what Katie O'Beirn and Rich Lowry have said about how Giuliani "women issues" have actually helped him.  Lowry via Greenwald...

Have been talking to some smart people today about Giuliani. Two of them said independently that the appeal of Giuliani is he'd be "a tough SOB -- for you," and that he'd be "a d*head -- for you." Another said . . . that a Giuliani supporter he knows considers the nasty divorce a kind of asset because it speaks to his toughness. . . .  

I think it's clear he'd be a "tough dickhead son of a bitch" for somebody - but there's no guarantee that it's going to you.  

Greenwald on O'Beirn:  

O'Beirne passed along an email from a friend which stated: "Contrary to popular speculation, the apparently brutal public dumping of Donna Hanover can only bolster the popularity of the man with conservatives." O'Beirne also suggested that an old Giuliani campaign ad showcasing his lovely family could be revised to say: "Don't worry. I dumped them all because I am that tough guy."  

The Past is Prologue.

If you look back, the signs are all there.  With a Giuliani Presidency we can not expect to see an actual moderate Republicanism, we will not see "Compassionate Conservative" finally realized, instead we can expect to see an even more extreme version of the Unitary Executive Theory than we have from John Yoo, more corruption and cronyism (Kerik), and even more excuses and justifications of racial profiling (against Muslims, Blacks and probably Latinos), illegal detainment of suspects and possibly even torture than we've seen so far from President Bush.  

And that's saying something.  

Even back in 1998 in response to Louima and Diallo - some New Yorkers saw it all clearly. He is George Bush Redux.  

The kind of mayor I want for my city would be deeply agitated by the killing of Amadou Diallo and would ask why he had such poorly trained, highly strung "heroes" patrolling in plainclothes. Giuliani, on television, merely seemed pained, as he always does. Undoubtedly he wishes it had not happened, but only because it is a nuisance to deal with ...

Yes, exactly how George Bush looked pained by the aftermath of Katrina - not because he was sorry that it had happened to all those who lost their lives and homes, but that it had happened to deeply embarrass his admistration.  

More from 1999:  

Rudy Giuliani is a dictator in waiting. He is self righteous, absolute, has no sense of humor, and will go to any lengths to punish his enemies. He is temperamentally completely unsuited to be senator [As he was vying at the time], as it is a job requiring negotiation, collegiality, and charm. I believe he is interested in the job for one reason only: as a stepping stone to the Presidency. If so, he would be the most dangerous president since Richard Nixon. In fact, I think he would be more dangerous: Nixon doubted himself and sometimes hesitated at the opportune moment; Giuliani feels no doubt and will not hesitate.



Ads by

1 Comment:

Anonymous said...

Emailed to 2500 opinion-shapers weekly
Please post and forward as appropriate
------------------------------------------------------ and Covering Up for Mass Serial Killers:


"This story got put on DIGG and received over 1000 "diggs," but only a couple dozen "buries" and it lasted on the front page and in the news section for all of 10 minutes or so. Real democratic, right? I'd call it censorship but I'm sure the Digg people would just say that's how their system works based on scientific formulas or some crap.

"Over at, a friend of mine posts articles on 9/11 that are legitimate and newsworthy, but yet are almost always deleted by the moderators.

"The majority of the bigger, more popular 'alternative' news sites refuse to deal with the truth of 9/11. INFORMATION CLEARING HOUSE is a breath of fresh air in this regard, and I'm proud to be here knowing that Tom isn't afraid to post 9/11 articles and films.

"9/11 is the USA's dirty little secret. The country is like one giant dysfunctional family, with a father who's a child molester and serial killer, but everyone's in denial about it or afraid to take down the monster father, for fear of the family falling apart. Americans who won't look at the truth of 9/11 are just wanting to keep the fantasy of the perfect family alive. Too many refuse to face up to the dirty little secret, and instead are allowing and even rooting for daddy to take us to war....


Dear Some of The Above News:

Welcome to the 911 Truth DVD Project web site.

This site exists to advance and promote the truth about what happened on 9/11/01 in order to force our government to investigate the matter fully and
openly using the subpoena and discovery powers of the judiciary to bring the true guilty parties to justice.

We have found through experience that videos are a great way to spark interest in the truth about what really happened on 9/11/01. Therefore, the
particular mission of the 911dvdproject is to help spread understanding of events on that day through the distribution of DVDs that educate the viewer about the many still unanswered questions and little known facts that remain concerning 9/11.

These are the DVDs we are currently offering:


Wednesday, April 04, 2007

I hope to respond specifically later today to some comments in the thread on the left about citizens' ability to identify the 9/11 perpetrators and bring them to justice.

As the speaker at the 9/11 conference I initially posted about here and then attended put it, "We're better than that."

Meaning, better than to allow not just all our leaders to be killed, like JFK as the commentor mentions, and RFK and MLK, but better than the milquetoasts who allow democracy to be completely subverted before our eyes that they want to turn us into.

Democracy has already been the cause of blood, sweat and tears spilled by people better than me and I won't be one of the ones known for handing it over without a similar outlay of my own energy.

This fight is already far more public and mainstream than the perpretators would like it to be, so why any talk about bending the knee?

9/11 was an inside job. At the very least we can give them the permanent taint of guilt by constantly referrring to their crimes, so let's start there. Though I do not think criminial prosecutions in the near future are impossible by any stretch.

Repeat after me: "9/11 was and inside job! 9/11 was an inside job!"

Feels good, doesn't it?


"GOD BLESS YOU ROSIE" Says top radio talk host LIONEL. Don't miss his fearless and informative rants on his show, and go to his website for great 9/11 investigation links: :
There simply is not enough room to list every 9/11 truth movement site. Here are a few to get you started. Remember, these are just a few. The internet is replete with such. Keep an open mind and remember . . . think!
The documentary that is a must-see. If just 10% of this is true, the enormity of this event and this country’s mind-boggling incuriosity are incalculable. Where have the mainstream media been? What do they have to fear? The truth?



Dear Friends,

Last Thursday, the Congressional Black Caucus Institute announced plans to partner with Fox News to host presidential debates--using the name and legacy of the Congressional Black Caucus to legitimize an organization that has shown nothing but hostility to Black Americans. The Institute's leaders made this decision after ignoring more than 12,000 emails protesting the plan, and despite almost 800 phone calls to individual CBC members asking them to use their positions to speak out against the deal with Fox.

The CBC and CBCI are betraying Black America, not just in the partnership with Fox, but by willfully ignoring the people they claim to represent. It's a unacceptable display of irresponsible representation and disconnected leadership.

Some of The Above News joined's campaign to demand that members of the CBC stop hiding and lead with integrity. We've seen that the CBC thinks it can ignore us, so we're going to need as many voices as possible to keep up the pressure. Will you join us?


March 29, 2007
WOW !!! Rosie is on a Roll
Rosie and the gals discuss Iran, false flags, WTC7, media propaganda, and Rosie nails ABC as one of four of the media corporations that spews the proganda on its people. What a great watch, the audience knows 9/11 was an inside job!


Would 9 Military Officers Lie in The Tillman Coverup?
Would an Attorney General Lie about Political Firings?
Would a President Lie about WMD?
Would a Bear Go to The Bathroom in The Designated Wilderness Area?


[9/11 bodies trashed in rush to cover up inside job?]

Families Of 9/11 Bombings Accuse New York City Of Losing Remains

Saturday, March 24, 2007; Posted: 02:47 AM

(RTTNews) - Family lawyers of those killed in the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center in September 2001, alleged in court documents the New York city forced workers cleaning up the site to use shortcuts that may have caused human remains to be lost forever.

Affidavits from four people who participated in the recovery efforts at the Fresh Kills Refuse Site have been relied in part in the documents filed Friday in US District Court.

Among the plaintiffs who filed the case against the city in 2005 include World Trade Center Families for Proper Burial, a group of about 1,000 families who believe their relatives' remains are at Fresh Kills.

Copyright(c) 2007, Inc. All Rights Reserved

March 26, 2007
9/11 and the Evidence
By Paul Craig Roberts

Professor David Ray Griffin is the nemesis of the official 9/11 conspiracy theory. In his latest book, Debunking 9/11 Debunking, Griffin destroys the credibility of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) and Popular Mechanics reports, annihilates his critics, and proves himself to be a better scientist and engineer than the defenders of the official story.

Griffin’s book is 385 pages divided into four chapters and containing 1,209 footnotes. Without question, the book is the most thorough presentation and examination of all known facts about the 9/11 attacks. Griffin is a person who is sensitive to evidence, logic, and scientific reasoning. There is no counterpart on the official side of the story who is as fully informed on all aspects of the attacks as Griffin.


The NIST 911 Report On The World Trade Center Collapse
By Mark H. Gaffney



There is help for you!

If you are among the 16% who still believe the
Neonazicons' conspiracy theory about 9/11, YOU CAN BE
HELPED! Simply click on the links below to read the
scientific debunking of the Bush pseudoscience
fairytale about the WTC 9/11 atrocity.


Get Radio Active

U.S. Being Awakened from Media-induced Coma by AIR
AMERICA RADIO: Find your station HERE:


To be removed from or to subscribe to this free
Enewsletter list please email with
REMOVE or SUBSCRIBE in the subject line.
And if you don't like our news go make some of your

Founder 2002: Johannieson & Friends
Editor: Myra M. Jackson