Be INFORMED

Saturday, November 05, 2011

The New Lobbyist Began At Sen. Mitch McConnell’s Office….

…. and this should be spread to ALL of the Congressional offices in D.C. and to their home-state offices also. Occupy the offices of both the Republicans and the Democrats as both parties are responsible for the current economic mess in America.

Protesters Occupy Sen. Mitch McConnell’s office

by roseeriter      Fri Nov 04, 2011

YES!!  Occupy the Do Nothing Senator!!

Protesters occupy Sen. Mitch McConnell’s office

How long before Mitch starts walking around with a tear gas mask? lol

About 20 unemployed and underemployed D.C. residents occupied the office of Republican Sen. Mitch McConnell (KY) on Thursday, pledging to remain until the senator met with them about the Rebuild America Act.

An organizer for the group Our D.C., James Adams, told Raw Story that they had entered McConnell’s office around 10:30 am and vowed not to leave until they meet with him.

Legislative aides offered to meet with the protesters, but the group has made it clear they only wanted to meet with the senator face-to-face.

“We’re here until we meet with him,” Adams said. “The people here have suffered unbelievable hardship because they haven’t been able to find work and they believe that Senator McConnell needs to hear their story, needs to understand the pain… folks are angry and tired and they feel like he needs to hear them.”

These brave protesters are the NEW LOBBYISTS!!

I hope we get a OWS group outside all of the congresscritters offices!

Occupy the Filibusters!!

Originally posted to roseeriter on Fri Nov 04, 2011
Also republished by Occupy Virtual America: Progressive State Groups Newsletter and Class Warfare Newsletter: WallStreet VS the Working Class Occupy movement..

 

Friday, November 04, 2011

Friday Funnies: Nothing Special Edition

David Letterman: "Hookers in Times Square, God bless 'em, are offering a Mitt Romney Special. For an extra $20 they'll change positions."

"People say that Rick Perry may have been drunk at an appearance. Well, take a look at those poll numbers. I'd be drunk too."

"When Herman Cain was in charge of the National Restaurant Association, there were allegations of sexual harassment. They have revealed one came from Sara Lee."

"President Obama had his physical today. His cholesterol is down, blood pressure down, approval rating down. He's fit and eats healthy food, and Fox News says that proves he's not an American."

Jay Leno: "President Obama invited trick-or-treaters to the White House Saturday night and they had a very scary party. They sat in a circle, turned off all the lights and the kids read the president his poll numbers."

"Earlier tonight, a bunch of rich kids came to my door, took all my candy and the other 99 percent of the kids in the neighborhood are now occupying my lawn."

"The economy is still hurting. Thirty percent of Americans are so disillusioned, they are thinking of moving back to Mexico."

"Two women have accused Herman Cain of sexually suggestive behavior in the '90s. He said no. He was just explaining to them his 69-9-9 plan."

 

"Herman Cain told a group of Occupy Wall Street protesters to go home, get a job, and get a life. That's the Republican version of hope and change, ladies and gentlemen."

Occupy The Koch Brothers—And Stop The American Nightmare

by ijpoole    Thu Nov 03, 2011

The very name of a Washington conservative conference this weekend is the height of subterfuge. It's called the "Defending the American Dream" conference, which is not about defending the actual American dreams of most Americans (the focus of our own "Take Back the American Dream" conference), sponsored by Americans for Prosperity, which is not an organization that promotes what is needed for broad American prosperity.

This actually is the latest effort by the billionaire Koch brothers, founders and key funders of Americans for Prosperity, and their corporate and political allies to hijack our democracy and pillage our economy. It's their attempt to perpetuate an American nightmare of continued income inequality and a government held hostage to the whims of elites. It is thus a perfect target for the latest Occupy-style protest.

The Other 98% and Health Care for America Now are sponsoring a "Koch Brothers Guerrilla Drive-In" Friday evening at the Washington Convention Center, where the conference is being held. The plan is to have an outdoor showing of a documentary on how the Kochs are using their fortune to pursue their grotesque mangling of American democracy.

The conference itself brings together many of the players in and elements of their grand scheme. For example, there is James O'Keefe, the person who dressed up as a pimp in a scheme to get damaging video footage for his scurrilous slander of the group ACORN, doing a lecture on "investigative journalism." There's Grover Norquist on a panel on "pro-growth tax reform." (He's lately been championing Texas Gov. Rick Perry's "flat tax" plan, which would allow the wealthy to slash their tax payments and would explode the federal deficit, forcing Norquist's longtime shrink-government-and-drown-it-in-the-bathtub objective.) There's Kansas Republican Rep. Mike Pompeo, a member of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, on a panel on the Environmental Protection Agency's "job-crushing regulatory assault"; he will be speaking on behalf of the Koch brothers, his leading campaign contributor, and the oil and gas industry, his biggest source of campaign cash. At least two Republican presidential candidates, Mitt Romney and Herman Cain, are also scheduled to appear.

    No conservative conference is complete without the deification of Ronald Reagan, and there will be plenty of that going on at the Friday night "Tribute to Ronald Reagan" dinner, which will be followed by a screening of "Atlas Shrugged." (No, I am not making this up.)

    But what makes this conference significant is not the tired repetition of right-wing bumper-sticker slogans, the over-the-top characterizations of Obama administration policy or the pathetic preening of presidential candidates to show off how extreme they can be. It is the very real damage that the Koch brothers and the forces that this conference is assembling are doing to our economy and to the 99 percent of us for whom the American dream of economic security is becoming increasingly out of reach.

    Consider what the Koch brothers have actually been "defending":

• Their $45 million effort to buy control of Congress. That's the amount of money Forbes magazine says Americans for Prosperity spent in the 2010 elections. That money helped Republicans control the House with the most extreme group of conservatives elected in modern history. With this group firmly in control, every effort by the Obama administration to move legislation to revive the economy has been thwarted and previous successes in health care and financial reform have come under unrelenting attack. The stream of anti-regulation, anti-labor legislation passed by the Tea Party-besotted House is pretty much lifted straight from the Koch brothers legislative agenda.  

• The destructive efforts of the American Legislative Exchange Council to co-opt state and local governments. Rather than promoting state and local governments as entities that are particularly equipped to respond to the public interest because of their proximity to the people, ALEC mounts campaigns that leave state and local governments facilitating private greed rather than serving the public good. In August The Nation's Lisa Graves explained that "of all the Kochs’ investments in right-wing organizations, ALEC provides some of the best returns: it gives the Kochs a way to make their brand of free-market fundamentalism legally binding." Examples include legislation that allows energy companies to avoid fines for polluting, that push privatization of public education, and that prevent states and localities from regulating the rogue behavior of financial institutions.  

• ALEC's efforts to suppress voter turnout. The Koch brothers' fingerprints are all over the efforts by various Republican governors and legislatures to pass voter ID laws that use trumped-up allegations of voter fraud to deliberately disenfranchise voters most likely to oppose their agenda. "It was ALEC’s draft legislation that inspired a spate of recently passed voter ID laws that, if allowed to stand, are expected to marginalize the impact of students and people of color at the polls in Texas, South Carolina, Wisconsin, Tennessee and Kansas," Adele Stan reported for the AFL-CIO blog. Patrick Caldwell at the American Prospect wrote that "the rules are often configured specifically to favor the Republican base at the expense of excluding likely Democrats."  

• Their assault on public workers. Scott Walker won the governorship of Wisconsin and the ability to execute his attack on public workers there with the help of $43,000 in direct contributions from the Koch Industries political action committee and indirectly through the $1 million that Koch's PAC gave to the Republican Governors Association. The Kochs are also major supporters of Ohio Gov. John Kasich, who earlier this year credited "the strong support" of Americans for Prosperity for his now faltering attempt to strip Ohio state workers of their bargaining rights.  

• The dominance of extremist candidates in the 2012 presidential race. Koch bothers money can be found in the pockets of at least three of the most extreme Republican presidential candidates: Minnesota congresswoman Michele Bachmann, Texas Gov. Rick Perry and, especially, Herman Cain.Rachel Maddow reported that the Cain connections include a campaign manager from the Wisconsin chapter of Americans for Prosperity, a now ex-spokesperson from another Americans for Prosperity affiliate, and the economic advisor who came up with Cain's infamous "9-9-9" tax plan, who was a member of Americans for Prosperity's advisory board. This is no surprise, because, as the Associated Press has reported, Cain has historically been a shill for the Americans for Prosperity legislative agenda. The Kochs have said they will pour at least $200,000 into the 2012 presidential campaign. "At least" is the operative phrase; expect the Kochs to funnel millions of dollars into the 2012 campaign through a variety of channels, most of which—thanks in part to the Supreme Court's Citizens United ruling—will be unrestricted and largely untraceable.  

• Their ability to violate the law with impunity, and to punish those who hold them accountable. A Bloomberg Markets magazine investigation published in October calls it "the Koch method," in which employees of the brothers' oil and gas companies "were shown by their managers how to steal and cheat." The stealing and cheating, according to Bloomberg, ranged from not paying royalties for oil extracted from federal land to bribing foreign officials to win contracts—and firing the company compliance officer who discovered the bribes and called them to the attention of top corporate officials. "For six decades around the world, Koch Industries has blazed a path to riches -- in part, by making illicit payments to win contracts, trading with a terrorist state, fixing prices, neglecting safety and ignoring environmental regulations. At the same time, Charles and David Koch have promoted a form of government that interferes less with company actions," the magazine wrote.

    Unregulated, unaccountable corporations. Extremist elected officials who disdain the concept of a government serving the common good. Workers stripped of the ability to negotiate collectively for fair pay, working conditions and benefits. Hundreds of millions of corporate dollars drowning out the voices of working-class and middle-class people. Voters forced to jump over ever-higher obstacles to vote for candidates who represent them, assuming those candidates can even get on ballots. This is the Koch brothers' dystopia. What they are defending is indefensible.

    For at least a few hours on Friday evening, the Washington Convention Center should be the focus of Occupy movement and its allies, for the Koch brothers embody just about everything the Occupy movement is against—members of the 1 percent who act as if our economy and our democracy should be their personal servant, and that the 99 percent should feel satisfied with the crumbs off their table.

    It is time for us to declare that we are the real Americans for prosperity, those of us who believe that workers should receive a fair wage for a fair day's work and be treated with dignity; that companies should be accountable for the harm that they do to people and the environment; that health care is a basic right for every person; that the education of our children shouldn't be turned into yet another corporate profit center; that government can and should work for all of the people, not the privileged few; that our democracy is the property of the people and cannot be owned by those with the most money.

    We cannot allow the Koch brothers' so-called "American dream" to continue to be our national nightmare.

TAKE ACTION
Occupy the Kochs Guerrilla Drive-In
6 p.m. Friday, November 4
Washington Convention Center (Parking lot near 7th and L Street NW entrance)
Updates: Text  @GuerrillaTeamDC to 23559


Sean McMartin contributed to this article. This originally appeared on OurFuture.org
Originally posted to Isaiah J. Poole on Thu Nov 03, 2011
Also republished by American Legislative Transparency Project and Community Spotlight.

 

The Koch Brothers And ALEC…

   …. influence runs very deep throughout corporate America and the American system of government, including the United States Supreme Court. This “ cabal “ of conservative, right-wing influence even stretches across the Atlantic.

   It is suggested that the following be spread around as much as possible to those who keep up with the political scene in the United States.

   This post is a long read.

Koch/ALEC Cabal - a Smoking Gun for financial connections and control...

by Bob Sloan   Wed Nov 02, 2011

Many have fought long and hard to prove connections between Charles and David Koch and the various Conservative Right Wing groups, organizations, foundations and Main Stream Media outlets.  Hours and in some instances months of deep research has come away with bits and pieces of the involvement of Koch with the various suspect groups.  The most that is usually found is a trace of periodic or sporadic funding from one of the numerous Koch held "Foundations" to the individual entities suspected of deeper connections to Koch.

The question of ties between the Conservative Right Wing think tanks, "grass root" activism and Koch money resulted in my coming at the subject from a different angle altogether.  I was looking for not only some form of monetary support but control as well - a way in which Koch money not only funded activities of specific entities, but was able to maintain some form of controlling those activities and "keeping an eye" on their investments.

I believe I found the answers to these two key questions.

Many wonder how Davy Boy and Ol' Chucky ensure that they get their money's worth out of the organizations they fund and support.  How do they control the work or dissemination of Conservative "messages"?  I found their operation is much simpler and more effective than many would believe and done through a system that has virtually been ignored by media and most researchers.  Going at it the way I did I also uncovered how they are able to have additional control over what is printed about them in corporate controlled media outlets - print, TV and other formats.

It begins with Koch's Institute For Humane Studies.  IHS describes their mission as:

"Mission
The mission of IHS is to support the achievement of a freer society by discovering and facilitating the development of talented students, scholars, and other intellectuals who share an interest in liberty and in advancing the principles and practice of freedom.

"Each year IHS awards over $750,000 in scholarships to students from universities around the world. IHS also sponsors the attendance of hundreds of students at its summer seminars and provides various forms of career assistance, including sponsored internships, to students and recent graduates pursuing careers in academia, journalism, and public policy. Through its programs, the Institute promotes the study of liberty across a broad range of disciplines, encouraging understanding, open inquiry, rigorous scholarship, and creative problem-solving."

IHS lists 96 - that's right - 96! organizations that Koch provides "internships" to.  They pay these interns $10.00 per hour each and that helps keep the payroll costs down for the organizations where they're placed.  It also allows Koch to have direct inside information about the ongoing activities and efforts being conducted in each of those organizations, foundations and "charities". 

The list begins here: http://www.theihs.org/....  You'll notice that all the usual suspects we've come to know and expect listed here - plus a few that have so far slipped under everyone's radar.  Fourth on the list is ALEC:

"American Legislative Exchange Council
(Washington, DC) The mission of the American Legislative Exchange Council is to advance the Jeffersonian principles of free markets, limited government, federalism, and individual liberty, through a nonpartisan public-private partnership of America's state legislators, members of the private sector, the federal government, and general public. The council works with state legislators from all parties and members of the private sector who share ALEC's mission. The council conducts a policy making program that unites members of the public and private sectors in a dynamic partnership to support research, policy development, and dissemination activities. The council also prepares the next generation of political leadership through educational programs that promote the principles of Jeffersonian democracy. www.alec.org"

There are page after page of these "affiliates" Koch provides intern staffing to annually.  This is bad enough - but as with so much else, it gets so much worse...

Many - including myself - have complained for years about our main stream media refusing to report on Koch activities, ALEC's pro-corporate legislation and in general ignoring anything negative to the Conservative far right groups.  Perhaps the second "Scholarship" program of the IHS helps shed some well needed sunlight on why this problem with the MSM exists.  IHS scholarships include placement in newspaper, broadcast, digital and investigative media outlets. 

IHS also funds "scholarships" (there's the same term used by ALEC to excuse their funding of travel and meeting attendance expenses for legislators, indicating "education" rather than programming) for what they term their "Journalism Internship Program": http://www.theihs.org/.... Have you ever written a letter to the editor, sent a query about ALEC to your local newspaper or TV affiliate?  And when you got no response or were ignored and wondered if your letter got to the Editor, producer or other executive, did you ever wonder who actually opened your email or letter?  That's right, interns.  Journalism interns receive an additional $3,000 + stipend along with per travel and other expenses.

Realizing that this is not some intern program that just began...was started last year, or in 2000...but rather has been ongoing through IHS since 1961 when it was founded, helps explain how conservatives have been able to work their way through the media and insinuate themselves throughout our media.  Graduates of the internship program also now have jobs as legislative assistants, aides to lawmakers, hold key positions throughout the U.S. and state government agencies and departments.  These men and women have been trained, indoctrinated and groomed to go out and take their places as the next - and next - generations of Conservative Right Wingers.

At first blush, some may think how widespread could such influence possibly be?  How can a simple "intern" program be used to disseminate a Conservative Right Wing agenda across the country and throughout various businesses, organizations, and our media?

When researching IHS on Muckety I found their description of IHS as:

Muckety metrics:
Connections: Institute for Humane Studies has direct or once-removed relationships with 51 people, organizations or other entities in our database of the most influential people in America. Under a scoring system that gives more weight to direct links, this score is higher than 62% of all entries.

People related to Institute for Humane Studies:
Richard H. Fink - director
Other current Institute for Humane Studies relationships:
Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation - funder
George Mason University - program

Muckety connection score: 62

Here is a link to the basic view of the IHS chart:

imageDownload (9)
http://www.muckety.com/...

An extended or exploded view of the connections to everyone and every organization affiliated with IHS through Charles G. Koch:

imageDownload (8)

At the Muckety map link you can scroll down and all the individuals, organizations, foundations and connections are listed.  Mouse over each entry on this huge list of connections and it will provide the affiliations for that person, group, foundation etc.  This is a HUGE data base compiled just from the Koch affiliations through the Institute for Humane Studies.  Many will be surprised to see the links and named individuals connected.

http://www.muckety.com/...

Lots of connections through Ol' Chucky and his foundations. Let's take a closer look at how widespread his influence is.  Again using the Muckety data base I clicked on Charles Koch Charitable foundation and got this return:

Muckety metrics:
Connections: Charles G. Koch Charitable Foundation has direct or once-removed relationships with 398 people, organizations or other entities in our database of the most influential people in America. Under a scoring system that gives more weight to direct links, this score is higher than 98% of all entries.

Muckety connection score: 98

imageDownload (10)

Those interested can follow this link and click on the interactive map and become overwhelmed - I did that and the expanded map with named affiliations won't fit on this page.  I did do some one by one:

CATO Institute (Muckety rating 97%:
imageDownload (11)

Federalist Society (Muckety rating 99%!!

imageDownload (12)

So far the connections demonstrate a vast wealth of business, corporate and legislative affiliations and influence - from think tanks, to media and wealthy and powerful individuals within society and business.  This is the circle within which the interns selected by IHS begin to become acclimated.  First they work for these organizations and individuals, then many go on to become clerks for legislators, judges and aides to others.  As IHS advertises, the careers and career path of many chosen as interns begin with that internship.  Many possibly find their way to invitations to the various groups and organizations affiliated with Koch - such as the Federalist Society.

The Federalist Society - where all the big boys of Conservativism meet, hang out and discuss advancing their ideologies and agenda. Koch supported and funded. Of late we've read several articles about the membership of SCOTUS Justice Clarence Thomas in the Federalist Society:

"Charlottesville - Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas spoke at a banquet last night sponsored by the conservative Federalist Society lambasting critics who accuse him of impartiality because of his attendance at a meeting with the Koch brothers."

Thomas' membership in the Federalist Society is confirmed by Wikipedia here: http://en.wikipedia.org/...

At Muckety the chart shows no direct link between Thomas and the FS, but provides his relations hip rating as 96% and his influence rating as 92%.  Here is his basic chart:

Justice Clarence Thomas connections

But when you expand the chart through his current and ongoing relationship with Clerks and his good friend, Harlan R. Crow, that changes dramatically.  For instance several of his clerks shown in the above chart were also George Mason University Professors and/or Federalist Society members like Steven G. Bradbury (FS member), Michael E. O'Neill (GMU Law Professor) and Neomi Rao (GMU Law Professor) was a Republican witness against Sonia Sotomayor's confirmation hearing for Supreme Court Justice.

Here is Ms. Rao's Muckety chart:
Neomi Rao

When I looked at the Harlan R. Crow chart from Muckety I had an OMG moment.  Knowing Thomas' wife worked for the Heritage Foundation, was heavily funded by Conservatives and especially Harlan Crow: Harlan R. Crow affiliations I began to get a more complete, and truly frightening picture.  There at the center surrounding Harlan Crow and Clarence Thomas were all the foundations: Castle Rock, Charles Koch, Scaife, Searle and Bradley.  Most of the Conservative think tanks and the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth (remember what the did to Kerry?), American Enterprise Institute, National Center for Policy Analysis and Progress for America Voter Fund!  Alongside the funders were all the names associated with Conservative influence in America - and some internationally.

Additionally, we have SCOTUS Justice Antonin Scalia who is also a member of the Federalist Society: http://www.fed-soc.org/... along with Samuel Alito: http://www.rightweb.irc-online.org/....

Who would believe that this trail from lowly interns would lead all the way to our Supreme Court and into the heart of the Conservative Cabal like never before.

For those who have not seen or don't remember the ALEC connections to all this, here it is expanded and found at: http://my.muckety.com/...

imageDownload (2)

ALEC is the "legislative" arm of the cabal, writing the pro-corporate pro-conservative legislation that become the law of our states and nation.  George Mason University is the center of influence upon our Judiciary; seminars, internship programs such as the IHS and their Law Education Center used to "educate" judges.  Kansas University named in the IHS chart has a "Shook, Hardy & Bacon Center for Excellence in Advocacy".  Most who have studied ALEC know that Shook, Hardy and Bacon's two top lobbyists and partners, Victor Schwartz and Mark Behrens represent ALEC in the filing of briefs, Schwartz is the Chairman of the Civil Justice Task Force and Behrens serves as the "Advisor" on that same ALEC task force.  Behrens is one of two SHB lobbyists who got caught lobbying for ALEC in ND in 2009 on Asbestos legislation proposed by ALEC and under consideration in that state at the time.

So we have an intricately and well organized web stretching from the Koch brothers HQ in Kansas all the way through our state legislators, to the U.S. Congress and beyond that right into the halls of the U.S. Supreme Court...and to add insult to injury that influential web crosses the Atlantic in the form of the recently closed Atlantic Bridge Charity operated by/with ALEC.  This "Charity" was just closed down and the UK with the Minister of Defense resigning in the midst of a scandal that continues to widen and encompass more of Britain's top government officials, ALEC and some of their corporate members.

The foregoing is why I and many others have tried to convince Democrats - and especially Progessives in the Party to put aside their differences and pool resources and organize a defense against the cabal.  As this shows, they are anything but disorganized or under funded in their activities.  They may prevail unless we stop beating on them with twigs and begin finding 2" x 4"'s to hit back with.  To continue to battle them separately on teachers fighting over their education legislation, unions fighting on collective bargaining, students fighting back over voter suppression is to fight their fight.  This is what they anticipate and are prepared to overcome.  This cabal has the money, influence and power all concentrated in the hands of Ol' Chucky and Davy Boy.  They have gathered the major Conservative family foundations to their side to fund, have used that money to buy further influence within each state, our Congress, the state/federal judiciary and the Supreme Court.

To rebut our identifying all this power and influence the Conservatives rebut that by using George Soros' name as doing the same thing for the Liberals and Progressives...I only frigging wish he would!

If/when we come together and unify and take it to them on a national platform, that will be something they will have never anticipated - because Progressives can never quit quibbling amongst themselves and unify.  If this is done, they will be caught flat footed and have to develop other initiatives and plans to prevail.  Let's not fight their fight any longer...

5:18 PM PT: The poll question disappeared when I published it.  Here is the question I posed: "Is the term "Cabal" an accurate description of the entire network put together by Koch and ALEC?"

Originally posted to Bob Sloan on Wed Nov 02, 2011
Also republished by American Legislative Transparency Project, Earthship Koch, In Support of Labor and Unions, Occupy Virtual America: Progressive State Groups Newsletter, Class Warfare Newsletter: WallStreet VS the Working Class Occupy movement., and Community Spotlight.

A Jobs Bill From The House Of Representatives?

   The things that these frauds will do to kiss up to their “ Christian “ base and to avoid working on a jobs bill that makes any sense. I include the Democrats in the House also, since this bill was passed by a vote of 396 to 9 on Wednesday, November 3.

Kaili Joy Gray spells this bullshit bill out for you.

Vote affirming 'In God We Trust' motto is a jobs plan. Sort of.

No, this is not a story from The Onion. It is an actual bill, introduced by an actual member of the House, actually debated by other members of the House—for 35 minutes—and actually passed by a vote of 396 to 9 yesterday.

Thanks to the hardworking members of the House, "In God We Trust" is our official national motto. Still.

Of course, “In God We Trust” already is the national motto, guaranteed by an act of Congress in 1956.

And “In God We Trust” had already been reaffirmed once before as the national motto, by another act of Congress in 2002.

No matter, because the country obviously needed a third act of Congress to make it really, really, really clear that this is our motto. And it allowed members of Congress to pontificate on some of the deeper philosophical issues that face every American:

“Is God God? Or is man God? In God do we trust, or in man do we trust?” said Rep. Trent Franks (R-Ariz.). He was laying out the deeper meaning behind this debate — saying it was a chance for the House to reassert that it believes there is divine goodness and order in the universe.

If there isn’t, Franks said, “we should just let anarchy prevail because, after all, we are just worm food. So indeed we have the time to reaffirm that God is God and in God do we trust.”

But spending time on this critical issue isn't just about God God. Or man God. Or completely redundant, symbolic, meaningless gestures intended to give members of Congress something—anything—to do other than focus on jobs. No, this reaffirmation of the reaffirmation of the national motto has real-life, very practical applications. After all, when the Republicans took control of the House, they promised to strictly adhere to the Cantor Rule:

“Each day, we will hold ourselves accountable by asking the following questions: Are our efforts addressing job creation and the economy; are they cutting spending; and are they shrinking the size of the federal government while protecting and expanding individual liberty?” Cantor said at the beginning of this term. “If not, why are we doing it?”

Cantor's office did not explain how the "In God We Trust" re-reaffirmation addresses job creation and the economy, but the bill's sponsor, Rep. J. Randy Forbes (R-Va.) did:

Forbes, the bill’s sponsor, said it would inspire Americans in tough economic times. “Our citizens need that kind of hope,” he said, “and that kind of inspiration.”

So the next time you're applying for a job, or calculating whether you can afford rent and electricity, or hoping your health insurer will cover that new medication you need (if you're lucky enough to be insured), just think of God—that's God God, not man God—and trust in Him, and enjoy that hope and inspiration you now have to get you through the tough times, courtesy of the House of Representatives.

Originally posted to Kaili Joy Gray on Thu Nov 03, 2011
Also republished by Daily Kos.

Thursday, November 03, 2011

Only In America

Only in the United States......



The Greek Equivalent: American Homeowners

      Time for another trip to the other side of the ocean for an unbiased view of the goings-on in the United States, this time concerning our still continuing housing crisis.

Homeowners: America’s Greeks

By Moritz Koch

Translated By Sandra Alexander

26 October 2011

Edited by Mark DeLucas

Germany - Süddeutsche Zeitung - Original Article (German)

Large parts of the country are “underwater”: Many Americans cannot pay their mortgages, must give up their houses — and are berated by conservatives because of it. But Obama can’t permit himself to be intimidated. The homeowners need a debt cut; otherwise, the economy will stall.

It was a pivotal point in the genesis of the rightist tea party movement. In February 2009 TV moderator Rick Santelli got excited on the trading floor of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. “Do we really want to subsidize the losers’ mortgages?” he asked angrily. Santelli’s tirade became a YouTube hit. He spoke the mind of many conservatives who perceived Obama’s tentative plans to shore up the real estate market as a socialist plot against the American way of life.

Santelli’s words echo even today. The intimidated government still doesn’t find the courage to address the real estate crisis decisively. Obama did announce reforms on Monday [Oct. 24], but they, too, fall short. The country needs a rescue cruiser to maneuver through the sea of debt. It is only getting a rubber dinghy.

Large parts of the U.S. are “underwater.” That means that a house is worth less than the loan with which it is encumbered. One-fourth of all U.S. homeowners are overextended in this manner; in the one-time boom states of Florida, Arizona and Nevada, it is 50 percent or more. Many give up and stop making installment payments. The banks order eviction, housing prices fall further, and even more Americans are pushed underwater.

It is a vicious cycle, and the entire economy is suffering because of it. The burden of debt is slowing the consumption of the middle class, on which the U.S. economy depends. The real estate mess is America’s most important impediment to growth.

The answer of the government is: HARP — that is, the Home Affordable Refinance Program. The initiative should give homeowners the possibility of exchanging their old mortgage for a new one with lower interest — and even if the house is underwater. However, HARP is a failure. The government’s goal was to help 4 million to 5 million debtors. Yet, not even 1 million Americans used the program, and the real estate market is still aground. Now Obama promises to relax the criteria for participation in HARP. In the process a radical approach would be necessary: a debt cut to accommodate the price decline of real estate. Because the homeowners are America’s Greeks.

The fear that an abatement for the middle class would trigger a new wave of bank failures is exaggerated. The government real estate financiers Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac guarantee more than half of all U.S. mortgages. They would have to pick up the failures. That would burden the federal budget, but not at the same level, because the government already has to take responsibility for the losses of both institutes by evictions, which are being delayed by policies up to now.

Politically, a debt cut would be easy to force through. Obama could direct Fannie and Freddie to do it without a giving Congress a say. The impulse for growth would be enormous: Due to lower monthly installments, millions of families would have more money available for consumption. At the same time, they would become more mobile because they could sell their homes without a loss and accept jobs in other cities or states.

Yes, critics such as Santelli would bluster with rage. However, it is only shocking that the government is letting itself be intimidated by the blusterers on the far right. Three years after the bank bailout it is time for the country to help the citizens. America must contain the flood of debt that is drowning growth.

CLICK HERE FOR ORIGINAL VERSION

  

© 2010 Watching America and WatchingAmerica.com. All Rights Reserved

Herman Cain: The 'voice of the people' greater than voices of women he sexually harassed

Wed Nov 02, 2011 by Kaili Joy Gray

 

When you think of important movements that changed America, obviously you think of women's suffrage, voting rights ... and Herman Cain's journey to the White House, right?

“There are factions that are trying to destroy me personally, as well as this campaign," Cain said. "But there is a force greater – there is a force at work here that is much greater than those that would try to destroy me and destroy this campaign and this journey to the White House. And that voice is called the voice of the people. That’s why we’re doing as well as we are in this campaign thus far."

Ah yes. How does that standard protest chant go? The people, united, will never be ... allowed to breach their confidentiality agreements about being paid off to keep their mouths shut about Herman Cain sexually harassing multiple former employees?

Well, something like that.

Inspiring, but not that inspiring:

He added: "Y’all were supposed to applaud.”

Might want to think twice about adding that to the stump speech, Herman.

Originally posted to Kaili Joy Gray on Wed Nov 02, 2011 at 09:33 AM PDT.
Also republished by Daily Kos.

Wednesday, November 02, 2011

Herman Cain: The 'voice of the people' greater than voices of women he sexually harassed

Wed Nov 02, 2011 by Kaili Joy Gray

 

When you think of important movements that changed America, obviously you think of women's suffrage, voting rights ... and Herman Cain's journey to the White House, right?

“There are factions that are trying to destroy me personally, as well as this campaign," Cain said. "But there is a force greater – there is a force at work here that is much greater than those that would try to destroy me and destroy this campaign and this journey to the White House. And that voice is called the voice of the people. That’s why we’re doing as well as we are in this campaign thus far."

Ah yes. How does that standard protest chant go? The people, united, will never be ... allowed to breach their confidentiality agreements about being paid off to keep their mouths shut about Herman Cain sexually harassing multiple former employees?

Well, something like that.

Inspiring, but not that inspiring:

He added: "Y’all were supposed to applaud.”

Might want to think twice about adding that to the stump speech, Herman.

Originally posted to Kaili Joy Gray on Wed Nov 02, 2011 at 09:33 AM PDT.
Also republished by Daily Kos.

An Open Response to Drs. Biggs and Richwine at the Heritage Foundation

Tue Nov 01, 2011      by xajaxsingerx

Dear Drs. Richwine and Biggs:

I read the Heritage Foundation Report on Teaching this morning.  I found it because it was referenced at Daily Kos and I read it through over lunch.

It had me thinking all day about my chosen profession.

Your facts weren't necessarily wrong, and your conclusions were predictable.  You don't like the idea of public education -- you see it as a government intrusion into a marketplace that should be dominated by private industry -- and so it's really no surprise when you extend your distaste to us who do the dirty demon work of socializing and educating America's youth.

So yes.  Yes we are compensated well in excess of our private school counterparts.  Yes we generally scored more poorly on the SATs than our private sector counterparts. Yes we still have pensions and job security.

Yes. Yes. Yes.

But...

But But But.

But I have mentored a lawyer and a transplant surgeon who were making mid-career switches.  neither lasted a year in a job that I do with pleasure.  Those coming from better-compensated fields are much less likely to stay.

But I have watched private school teacher after private school teacher earn their credentials so they could come join us in the pay-haven of public schools only to turn around and go back to where there's toilet paper, working copiers, student loads under 100, and students they weren't afraid of.

But, just like all front-line civil servants, we are exposed to the capricious and sometimes vindictive wishes of the people we serve.  We have our job security because without it, we could not be effective.

But I did well on my SATs because I had parents who weren't willing to let me do poorly.  They paid for special intensive classes.  My 1340 was as much the result of money as it was the result of brains.  Were yours so different?

And a special but for those of us who willingly work in places like Watts:

But without us, our country may never be able to recover from the damage that's been done by years of social and political neglect.

As we are seeing on the national and international scale right now with the Occupy Movement, the social contract that bind a people and their government has frayed in the middle class. 

But there isn't an Occupy Watts because in Watts and neighborhoods and communities like it around the country, the social contract has already snapped.  It was ripped asunder generations ago in a massive display of frustration and instead of being renewed, it was replaced with a simple detente.

For most of the rest of us, this detente has been easy to mistake for renewal, but it is not.

But the students I see everyday don't make that mistake.  The children of the detente are not raised in a world where government provides safety and ensures the ability of its citizens to exercise the rights endowed to them by their creator.  The children of the detente are raised to see authority with a skepticism that many of the middle class have only learned to adopt later in life and with a cynicism that is heartbreaking. 

In the detente, social services are often viewed as entitlements instead of a leg up because in the detente, there is no easy foothold.

In the detente there is no Officer Friendly.

In the detente, the assumption is that teachers and social workers hate their jobs.

In the detente, nobody chooses to be a lifer.

But if we are ever to renew the contract with the urban poor, it is going to be the teachers, police, and social workers that do it.  It certainly won't be politicians or Ph.Ds.

And unless the contract is renewed, the libertarian/conservative dream world where opportunity is a choice for all will never come to fruition.

With this in mind, I ask that you, Drs. Richwine and Biggs, reflect for a moment.  If we are dumb and overpaid, then we should not be entrusted with the daily diplomacy necessary for renegotiating a broken social contract between a betrayed people and the government they believe has betrayed them.

Maybe you, good Doctors, and your friends at Heritage should be the ones who must always keep in mind that every negative interaction you have during the course of your day while you attempt to do good is a concrete confirmation of hopelessness. 

Maybe you should be the ones to inspire change in bad habits that were years in the making.  Our students are often a bundled soft core of fear and hurt wrapped in a cage of steel and covered with a soft, thin, skin, and I must warn you that you need to be careful on your approach because piercing skin means hitting steel. 

But maybe you would be better suited to unbuckle the taught steel that has been forged inside our students by crime, poverty, hopelessness and the deep belief that nobody cares about them.

Maybe you will be willing to take the time to dismantle the metal-hard shields through long-term, honest, earnest, relationships. 

Maybe you would better suited to the burden of knowing that if you make a promise, if you create an opening into the hurt underneath, that you had better be there to see it through or you will have destroyed an opportunity to heal a child and the country in which you both live.

Maybe you would be a better representative of the state than me and my colleagues who are dumb.

Maybe you know a better way to convince a child that the American Promise hasn't been broken.

But unless you are willing to unleash the power of your naturally high SAT scores to help us, you should probably shut the fuck up.

Reposted from my Personal Blog

Originally posted to Eminently Credulant Musings on Tue Nov 01, 2011
Also republished by Class Warfare Newslette

 

Transportation Spending: More Republican Falsehoods

   A Republican would not tell the truth even if their life depended on it. It just is not in their genetic make-up to do so.

Surprise! Republicans lie about 'wasteful' transportation spending

by Laura Clawson  for Daily Kos Labor    Mon Oct 31, 2011

When Oklahoma Sen. Tom "Dr. No" Coburn and his partners in intransigence want to depict funding for transportation enhancements as wasteful, they take two deceptive approaches, an AP fact check finds. First, they exaggerate the amount spent, saying that states are required to spend 10 percent of federal transportation money on the transportation enhancements program. In fact, it's 10 percent of one specific piece of federal aid, which amounts to just 2 percent of total federal transportation money.

Then they really go to work, spinning tales of specific outrages that have wasted federal transportation funding while our bridges crumble. The big problem with that is that, as the AP's Joan Lowy details, Coburn and allies like John McCain start with a list of 39 allegedly wasteful projects, out of more than 25,000 done in the program's nearly 20 year history, and even so many of their examples are false:

Coburn's list includes a 1996 grant for preservation of a "factory used to make saddletrees" — the foundation of a riding saddle — in Madison, Ind. Not mentioned is that the grant wouldn't qualify for enhancement money under current program rules, according to Transportation Department officials.

The Texas Department of Transportation is described as spending $16.2 million in enhancement money to restore the Battleship Texas, docked in the Houston Ship Channel. If so, they weren't federal transportation dollars. U.S. transportation officials said an application for the money was turned down.

The list cited landscaping to screen a junkyard in Aiken, S.C. After checking with state and local authorities, federal officials said the project was canceled years ago and again, no funds were awarded.

Then there are the cases where federal transportation money was actually spent, but Republicans are misrepresenting what it was spent on. They love to talk about the turtle tunnel in Florida, which allows turtles to cross under a busy section of road and not be run over. But as I've previously pointed out, even if you don't think saving wildlife is a worthwhile activity, that tunnel helps prevent traffic accidents that had been caused by drivers swerving to avoid turtles (and, Lowy notes, alligators and other animals). What's more, the tunnels came in under budget, where Republicans are claiming that the project is over budget and that expenditures are continuing.

Similarly, Republicans have represented a simulator theater at the National Corvette Museum as being entertainment, a chance to feel what it's like to drive a Corvette. But really, it's "a driver-education classroom for free driving classes for older people and teenagers."

It's the $16 muffin all over again, and it's the best they've got: lies, more lies and misrepresentations.

Originally posted to Daily Kos Labor on Mon Oct 31, 2011
Also republished by Daily Kos and Class Warfare Newsletter: WallStreet VS the Working Class Occupy movement..

Tuesday, November 01, 2011

Tax Havens Cost the Middle Class Untold Billions

by Kenneth Thomas      Tue Nov 01, 2011

Cross-posted from Middle Class Political Economist.

As I argued yesterday, when taxes are reduced for one group, government must raise taxes on someone else, run bigger deficits, or cut programs. Tax havens, jurisdictions with strong secrecy provisions and low or zero tax rates, are one way that rich individuals and corporations reduce their tax payments, both legally and illegally. A recent book by Ronen Palan, Richard Murphy, and Christian Chavagneux summarizes the latest work on tax havens and contends that they form a central part of the global economy. Tax Havens: How Globalization Really Works presents data that 30% of multinational corporations' foreign direct investment passes through tax havens like Bermuda, Ireland, or Luxembourg, overwhelmingly for tax purposes. Tax havens, then, are far more central to the global economy than we generally suppose.

How much does this cost average taxpayers? In a separate report, Murphy calculated that wealthy individuals have roughly $11.5 trillion in tax havens, which at a 7.5% rate of return would generate $860 billion in income each year. If, on average, these people faced a 30% marginal tax, that would come to $255 billion annually that the rich avoid in taxes. Needless to say, this is a best guess, since the value of these assets is not disclosed publicly. See his report for more details on how he generated those figures.

That's just individuals. The situation with corporations is murkier still. While corporations set up subsidiaries in tax havens for the obvious purpose of reducing their tax, Palan et al. say there is no solid estimate of the overall cost of these activities. The Government Accountability Office reported in 2008 that of the largest 100 U.S. companies, 86 had subsidiaries abroad, and 83 of these had subsidiaries in tax havens. Bank of America had 115 subsidiaries in tax havens, including 59 in the Cayman Islands. Citigroup had a whopping 427 tax haven subsidiaries, including 91 in Luxembourg and 90 in the Cayman Islands. Goldman Sachs only had 29, 15 in the Cayman Islands.

I mention the Cayman Islands because President Obama has long been a critic of tax havens, saying during the 2008 campaign of Ugland House in the Cayman Islands, "Either this is the largest building in the world or the largest tax scam in the world. And I think the American people know which it is." Palan et al. report that the Caymans are the sixth largest financial center in the world, with $1.9 trillion in assets in December 2007. However, since taking office, the President has not succeeded in passing a version of the Stop Tax Haven Abuse Act, which in its original form he co-sponsored with Carl Levin, Norm Coleman, Ken Salazar and Sheldon Whitehouse.

Tax havens could not exist without the financial services industry, which provides the tax lawyers, accountants, and other professionals who make it possible for the rich and corporations to reduce their taxes. Collectively, they and their clients are the 1%. Occupy Wall Street has highlighted the abuses benefiting them, and tax havens are most definitely part of their pattern of abuse. Tax havens have proved amazingly resilient, however, and it will take sustained political pressure to shut them down.

Originally posted to Kenneth Thomas on Tue Nov 01, 2011
Also republished by Class Warfare Newsletter: WallStreet VS the Working Class Occupy movement. and Community Spotlight.

 

Transportation Spending: More Republican Falsehoods

   A Republican would not tell the truth even if their life depended on it. It just is not in their genetic make-up to do so.

Surprise! Republicans lie about 'wasteful' transportation spending

by Laura Clawson  for Daily Kos Labor    Mon Oct 31, 2011

When Oklahoma Sen. Tom "Dr. No" Coburn and his partners in intransigence want to depict funding for transportation enhancements as wasteful, they take two deceptive approaches, an AP fact check finds. First, they exaggerate the amount spent, saying that states are required to spend 10 percent of federal transportation money on the transportation enhancements program. In fact, it's 10 percent of one specific piece of federal aid, which amounts to just 2 percent of total federal transportation money.

Then they really go to work, spinning tales of specific outrages that have wasted federal transportation funding while our bridges crumble. The big problem with that is that, as the AP's Joan Lowy details, Coburn and allies like John McCain start with a list of 39 allegedly wasteful projects, out of more than 25,000 done in the program's nearly 20 year history, and even so many of their examples are false:

Coburn's list includes a 1996 grant for preservation of a "factory used to make saddletrees" — the foundation of a riding saddle — in Madison, Ind. Not mentioned is that the grant wouldn't qualify for enhancement money under current program rules, according to Transportation Department officials.

The Texas Department of Transportation is described as spending $16.2 million in enhancement money to restore the Battleship Texas, docked in the Houston Ship Channel. If so, they weren't federal transportation dollars. U.S. transportation officials said an application for the money was turned down.

The list cited landscaping to screen a junkyard in Aiken, S.C. After checking with state and local authorities, federal officials said the project was canceled years ago and again, no funds were awarded.

Then there are the cases where federal transportation money was actually spent, but Republicans are misrepresenting what it was spent on. They love to talk about the turtle tunnel in Florida, which allows turtles to cross under a busy section of road and not be run over. But as I've previously pointed out, even if you don't think saving wildlife is a worthwhile activity, that tunnel helps prevent traffic accidents that had been caused by drivers swerving to avoid turtles (and, Lowy notes, alligators and other animals). What's more, the tunnels came in under budget, where Republicans are claiming that the project is over budget and that expenditures are continuing.

Similarly, Republicans have represented a simulator theater at the National Corvette Museum as being entertainment, a chance to feel what it's like to drive a Corvette. But really, it's "a driver-education classroom for free driving classes for older people and teenagers."

It's the $16 muffin all over again, and it's the best they've got: lies, more lies and misrepresentations.

Originally posted to Daily Kos Labor on Mon Oct 31, 2011
Also republished by Daily Kos and Class Warfare Newsletter: WallStreet VS the Working Class Occupy movement..

Monday, October 31, 2011

Herman Cain campaign may have violated campaign finance laws

   By Laura Clawson    Mon Oct 31, 2011     Daily Kos

Herman Cain's campaign may be raising $5 million per month now, but things weren't always so flush. Back in February and March, Prosperity USA, a nonprofit organization run by top Cain aides Smokin' Mark Block and Linda Hansen, provided start-up funding for Cain's campaign, the Journal Sentinel reports:

A more detailed checking account says the Cain campaign owed nearly $15,000 for an "Atlanta invoice," about $17,000 for chartered flight service and $5,000 for travel and meetings in Iowa, Las Vegas, Houston, Dallas and Louisiana. The document says the Cain campaign had been billed $3,700 for iPads purchased on Jan. 4.

A series of small-ticket items for travel and expenses by Block are listed as "not billed to FOH but due from them."

This would be totally illegal, of course, and, making things worse:

It is not known if Cain's election fund eventually paid back Prosperity USA, which now appears defunct. The candidate's federal election filings make no mention of the debt, and the figures in the documents don't match payments made by the candidate's campaign.

One question implied by the Journal Sentinel report is whether Prosperity USA was in fact founded as the precursor to a Cain campaign: Block founded the organization just last year and in the brief window of time between its founding and when Cain became a candidate, it was paying costs associated with his travel to give speeches to conservative groups and to meet with conservative funders like David Koch.

Though sexual harassment allegations against Cain will dominate today's news cycle, this story is going to be another gift that keeps on giving for Cain's opponents and a media that thrives on scandal.

Originally posted to Laura Clawson on Mon Oct 31, 2011
Also republished by Daily Kos.

Tax Wall Street to Heal America

Published on Monday, October 31, 2011 by OtherWords

The nation's nurses are calling for a tax on financial transactions to begin raising the revenue needed to fix the nation's growing social crisis. by Deborah Burger

National Nurses United, America's largest union of RNs, is sounding an alarm.

We've organized rallies in New York, Boston, Washington, Los Angeles, Chicago, San Francisco, and Las Vegas, as well as in Minnesota, Michigan, Texas, and Florida, other states and cities. We've held demonstrations at 60 congressional field offices. And we've joined the Occupy Together movement as first aid volunteers in more than a dozen sites, including on Wall Street, where it all started.Our protests are for our patients and for our country. We won't stop until an agenda to rebuild Main Street is secured. (photo: Mike Fleshman)

Through these actions and others, we're drawing attention to a national emergency and calling for a tiny but potentially powerful tax on financial transactions. This simple step would amass up to $350 billion annually in this country as part of a global push for revenue desperately needed here and elsewhere around the world.

Why are we making this tax a huge priority? For nurses, patient care extends beyond the bedside.

Consider this heartbreaking story. Steven Cross, a single dad, departed his Lakeville, Minnesota home last month after it was seized by the bank. He was one of the millions of Americans — through a combination of stagnant wages, massive unemployment, Wall Street gouging, and bank fraud — forced out of their homes in recent years. He left his 11-year-old son behind with his neighbors, telling them in a note, "I don't want him to remember me as homeless." Actually, more than memories were at stake. According to a recent survey conducted in California, two out of five of homeless people are at risk of dying a "premature death."

The richest 1 percent is doing us in. No one knows that better than us nurses. People are getting sick as a result of the system's collapse. Poverty and financial demise are engulfing communities while the wealth of a tiny minority continues to grow.

Early heart attacks, stomach ailments in children, acute anxiety in all age groups, and strokes are on the rise. All of these conditions are stress-related, induced by the conditions imposed on a society dedicated to fulfilling the needs of the richest 1 percent.

There was a 39-percent increase in suicide attempts in families experiencing foreclosure in four hard-hit states, according to a study conducted by researchers at Princeton and Georgia State universities. The 1 percent is bad for our health. Nurses see it every day in our hospitals and communities, and even in our own families. That's why we're protesting. We'll keep it up for the duration, until we see progress toward getting crucial new resources into our communities.

America's child poverty rate of 22 percent — and rising — is more than a national disgrace. It's a recipe for disaster. But it can begin to be addressed by revenue from a tax on stocks, bonds, derivatives, and speculative activity.

President Barack Obama must decide which side he is on, Wall Street or Main Street. If he's on Main Street's side, he needs to join the global movement in support of a tax on financial speculation. National Nurses United is sponsoring a major protest at the Treasury Department on Nov. 3, where we'll send this message to Obama, as well as Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, who's been telling Europe not to institute a financial transaction tax.

We need a tax like this. It would be a small amount for Wall Street to pay back to a reeling Main Street. It would be a down payment on the larger sum needed to put this country on its feet — to get the chronically jobless back to work, reduce school overcrowding, and provide quality health care for all Americans. To do all that, we'll need to find new sources of revenue. There's no other way to rescue our communities, save our families, and make our children healthy.

The alternative is bleak for us all — for those struggling like Steven Cross in Minnesota and for the 1 percent. Our protests are for our patients and for our country. We won't stop until an agenda to rebuild Main Street is secured.

Deborah BurgerDeborah Burger is a registered nurse and a co-president of National Nurses United

                                      www.commondreams.org