VP Cheney did not like it. The Washington Post editorial page did not like it. Rush and the rest of the conservative talk radio group did not like it. Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.), did not like it either. The list goes on and on but it seems as if the hawks that dislike the report the most are the ones that have been on Mr. Bush's " stay the course" bandwagon.
Mr McCain did not like the fact that the report did not recommend sending in more troops to Iraq.
William Kristol, editor of the Weekly Standard,"It's sort of hard to suddenly say everyone agrees Baker is the way to go when the leading Republican candidate for '08 is saying no."
I am waiting to see how long it takes for these hawks to begin calling the drafters of this report " traitors, un-American" and so forth. Anyone listening to the crap out of Rush's mouth and buying into it is just showing how far down the I.Q. chain this country is heading! Michael d.
--------------------------------------------------
By Michael Abramowitz and Glenn Kessler
Washington Post Staff Writers
Sunday, December 10, 2006
Although it is clear that many Republicans regard the Iraq Study Group's report as a possible exit strategy from a war that they worry could drag the party down in 2008, such plans are colliding with clear anger from neoconservatives, who have been the most ardent supporters of the Bush administration since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.
Many Republican and Democratic lawmakers have embraced the panel's report, but the almost uniformly negative reaction from some of Bush's strongest conservative supporters means the president may have some political flexibility to depart from the group's major recommendations, according to some GOP operatives. More