Be INFORMED

Thursday, January 18, 2007

Pulitzer Prize Winner Art Buchwald Dead at 81

    I used to read Mr. Buchwald's column as a teenager and he always was pretty much right on target with his views.

   Mr Buchwald died from kidney illness which he has been battling for quite some time.

    Art Buchwald will be sorely missed by many.

    From one of Mr. Buchwald's column's on March 7:

 "I am writing this article from a hospice. But being in the hospice didn't work out exactly the way I wanted it to. By all rights I should have finished my time here five or six weeks ago -- at least that's all Medicare would pay for."

"I have no idea where I'm going but here's the real question: What am I doing here in the first place?"

                                   * * * *

 

Buchwald's Farewell Column, Written to Be Released at Death
By E&P Staff
Published: January 18, 2007 2:50 PM ET

NEW YORK Art Buchwald wrote a final column that he asked not be distributed until after he died. The piece was penned on Feb. 8, 2006, after Buchwald decided to check into a hospice. He eventually left the hospice, of course, and resumed his syndicated column. Buchwald died last night at the age of 81. Here's the farewell column, courtesy of Tribune Media Services:
***
GOODBYE, MY FRIENDS
By Art Buchwald
Tribune Media Services
Several of my friends have persuaded me to write this final column, which is something they claim I shouldn't leave without doing.
There comes a time when you start adding up all the pluses and minuses of your life. In my case I'd like to add up all the great tennis games I played and all of the great players I overcame with my now famous "lob." I will always believe that my tennis game was one of the greatest of all time. Even Kay Graham, who couldn't stand being on the other side of the net from me, in the end forgave me.
I can't cover all the subjects I want to in one final column, but I would just like to say what a great pleasure it has been knowing all of you and being a part of your lives. Each of you has, in your own way, contributed to my life.
Now, to get down to the business at hand, I have had many choices concerning how I wanted to go. Most of them are very civilized, particularly hospice care. A hospice makes it very easy for you when you decide to go.
What's interesting is that everybody has his or her own opinion as to how you should go out. All my loved ones became very upset because they thought I should brave it out -- which meant more dialysis.
But here is the most important thing: This has been my decision. And it's a healthy one.
The person who was the most supportive at the end was my doctor, Mike Newman. Members of my family, while they didn't want me to go, were supportive, too. But I'm putting it down on paper, so there should be no question the decision was mine.
I chose to spend my final days in a hospice because it sounded like the most painless way to go, and you don't have to take a lot of stuff with you.
For some reason my mind keeps turning to food. I know I have not eaten all the eclairs I always wanted. In recent months, I have found it hard to go past the Cheesecake Factory without at least having one profiterole and a banana split.
I know it's a rather silly thing at this stage of the game to spend so much time on food. But then again, as life went on and there were fewer and fewer things I could eat, I am now punishing myself for having passed up so many good things earlier in the trip.
I think of a song lyric, "What's it all about, Alfie?" I don't know how well I've done while I was here, but I'd like to think some of my printed works will persevere -- at least for three years.
I know it's very egocentric to believe that someone is put on earth for a reason. In my case, I like to think I was. And after this column appears in the paper following my passing, I would like to think it will either wind up on a cereal box top or be repeated every Thanksgiving Day.
So, "What's it all about, Alfie?" is my way of saying goodbye.

                                      * * * *

 Those of you who may not be familiar with Mr. Buchwald can read some of his past columns here from The Washington Post.

 

Technorati tags: ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Sen. Chuck Hagel after Bush's Speech On Jan.10

    Senator Chuck Hagel (R-NEB.):

"The speech given [Jan. 10] by this president represents the most dangerous foreign policy blunder in this country since Vietnam.We are projecting ourselves further and deeper into a situation that we cannot win militarily."

"To ask our young men and women to sacrifice their lives to be put in the middle of a civil war is wrong. It's, first of all, in my opinion, morally wrong. It's tactically, strategically, militarily wrong."

"[T]he fact is, the Iraqi people will determine the fate of Iraq. The people of the Middle East will determine their fate. We continue to interject ourselves in a situation that we never have understood, we've never comprehended [and] we now have to devise a way to find some political consensus with our allies [and] the regional powers, including Iran and Syria."

"To say that we are going to feed more young men and women into that grinder, put them in the middle of a tribal, sectarian civil war, is not going to fix the problem."

    Maybe if some of our president wanna-be Democrats had a spine and spoke out like Senator Hagel has, we might put an end to this shit!

 

Technorati tags: , , ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com