Be INFORMED

Sunday, January 21, 2007

An $8 Billion A Month War In Iraq

Pentagon sees U.S. war cost in Iraq rising
Fri Jan 19, 2007
By Richard Cowan     Reuters Article

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The steadily rising Iraq war price tag will reach about $8.4 billion a month this year, Pentagon spokesmen said on Thursday, as heavy replacement costs for lost, destroyed and aging equipment mount.

The Pentagon has been estimating last year's costs for the increasingly unpopular war at about $8 billion a month, having increased from a monthly "burn rate" of around $4.4 billion during the first year of fighting in fiscal 2003.

During testimony at a House Budget Committee hearing, Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England said that nearly four years into the war, the Pentagon's war costs were rising because it was having to replace big-ticket items such as helicopters, airplanes and armored vehicles that are wearing out or were lost in combat.

"We have a backlog and are seeing an increase," England told the panel.

When factoring in U.S. combat costs in Afghanistan, the Pentagon will spend about $9.7 billion a month during the fiscal year that ends on Sept. 30, according to Pentagon spokesmen.

Early next month, the administration is expected to ask Congress for a further $100 billion in "emergency" war money, on top of the $70 billion already approved for this year. The request comes as President George W. Bush has sketched out an increase of 21,500 U.S. troops in Iraq that could cost about $5.6 billion.

House Budget Committee Chairman John Spratt, a South Carolina Democrat, said he hoped Congress could avoid recurring emergency funding bills for the war. "We would like to get a better grasp of the cost of the Iraq war and the global war on terrorism -- a way of accounting of costs to date and projecting costs to come."

Since fiscal 2001, Congress has approved $503 billion to pay for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and other aspects of the U.S. "global war on terrorism," according to Congressional Budget Office testimony. Of that, $344 billion has gone for military, diplomatic and other security costs in Iraq, the CBO said.

                                            * * * *

    $8 billion a month? That is alot of cash for something that we cannot do right. We have no good results coming from this waste of the taxpayers hard-earned money. At least 3,033 of our troops have died for this ' gamble.'

 

Technorati tags: , , ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Saturday, January 20, 2007

Bush State Of The Union Speech

      The President's State of the Union speech comes up on Tuesday, giving him one more chance to convince both the public and the House and Senate that his plan for Iraq is the right plan. He will, no doubt, wish to 'stay the course' in his speech and he will not give in to any idea's but his own.

    As was with his childhood, he is a sore loser and he will not give up even if he knows that he is wrong. He is just attempting to change the rules a little bit but with the same outcome as before.

   The Democrat's do not support an 'escalation' and many Republicans do not either. Other GOP members are trying to get out from under the Bush fiasco as they clearly understand that they will not be re-elected in 2008 if they stick with the Bush rhetoric.

    It is being suggested by former speech writers that Bush needs to be more forceful, blunt or combative in his speech to rebuff both his critics and the Democrats.

    White House deputy press secretary Dana Perino:

"President Bush will discuss his determination to defeat the terrorists who are part of a broader extremist movement that is now doing everything it can to defeat us in Iraq. If the extremists prevail in Iraq, the American people will be less safe and our enemies will be emboldened and more lethal."                     Yahoo News Article

Bush probably will try to link the war to the threat to America since the Sept. 11 attacks because fighting terrorism has such widespread appeal, said Bruce Riedel, a former official at the National Security Council and analyst at the liberal Brookings Institution.

"Fear is a commodity that the administration has sold before, and right now they're not having much success with the public or the Congress with the arguments they've trotted out on the (troop) surge," said Ridel.

   So it looks as if the 'fear card' will be taking the spotlight once again. This time around we will really get to see if the public is still so ignorant and stupid as to listen to anything this sack of shit says!

 

Technorati tags: , , ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com