Be INFORMED

Wednesday, February 14, 2007

NFL Refuses Super Bowl Recruitment Ad From Border Patrol Because It Mentioned The Borders

   

Ads by AdGenta.com

   Not that it really matters all that much, but I ran across this piece in the Washington Times on the NFL refusing to air a recruitment ad from the U.S. Border Patrol  during the Super bowl last week because the NFL considered the ad to controversial to run because it mentioned things that the agents would be doing, like fighting against terrorism, stopping the flow of drugs, and stopping those pesky illegal aliens from crossing the border.

    Greg Aiello, a spokesman for the NFL:   "The ad that the department submitted was specific to Border Patrol, and it mentioned terrorism. We were not comfortable with that. The borders, the immigration debate is a very controversial issue, and we were sensitive to any perception we were injecting ourselves into that                                                            We proposed a more generic recruiting ad for the department that didn't highlight the borders, which brings up the immigration issue and the immigration debate. That's controversial."

   Am I missing something here? Let me see here. Border Patrol. If you are going to do an ad for recruits, should you not be allowed to mention that the job requires you to maybe work along the border? how the hell can you do an ad with any guts to it without mentioning the border if it is for the Border Patrol?

   Border Patrol agents took this as a knock on themselves and their jobs, and rightfully so!

 

Second Blogger Leaves Edwards Campaign and Who the Heck Is Bill Donohue Anyway?

    Well hell! It looks as if Melissa McEwan, the second blogger working for Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards, has resigned. all of this just because some asshole with a Catholic group did not like her post that she put up on her blog!

    Being a Christian myself, I have nothing against the Catholics, but you people who head these groups ( not just Catholic ) need to get a life!

    In one of her postings, McEwan once said that the Christian Bush supporters were his "wingnut Christofascist base." 

    Given the fact that Bush had a lot of Christian support in 2004 after all of the lies and other bull starting coming to the surface, I think that McEwan was pretty much correct. She just needed to maybe say it in another way, or maybe not.

    Are we not supposed to be able to speak our minds about politics or anything else for that matter, in the United States? Let's face it, you cannot always say things that will make everyone happy with your views and if we have to watch every word which comes out of our mouths in order to not offend somebody, then this is going to be a very quiet country to be in.

    At the same time, it is quite alright for Bil Donohue to go flapping his face about things in any manner that he sees fit because he belongs to a religious group? Therein lies the problem. A religious group is not necessarily a Christian group. We are short on real Christian groups but boy are we more than overwhelmed by the " religious " ones!

                   * * * *

   Charlotte Observer

MIKE BAKER
Associated Press

RALEIGH, N.C. -

Melissa McEwan wrote on her personal blog, Shakespeare's Sister, that she left the campaign because she was becoming increasingly uncomfortable with the level of attention focused on her and her family.

"This was a decision I made, with the campaign's reluctant support, because my remaining the focus of sustained ideological attacks was inevitably making me a liability to the campaign," she said Tuesday night. McEwan had been hired in late January as a part-time technical adviser.

"She resigned from the campaign today - that was her decision," she said. Both Bedingfield and McEwan declined additional comment.

McEwan's resignation comes just one day after another blogger, Amanda Marcotte, left the Edwards staff for similar reasons.

 Bill Donohue, president of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights, "It's too bad that Edwards didn't make the decision himself to get rid of them.Why he had to wait for these women to bail on their own doesn't speak well for him. But I'm delighted, and as far as I'm concerned, this closes the issue. I have no vendetta against John Edwards."

"We're beginning a great debate about the future of our country, and we can't let it be hijacked," Edwards said in a statement last week.

 

 

Ads by AdGenta.com