Death Squads and Manipulated US Forces in Iraq?

     My,My,My!

    This report has some interesting things to say about some of the happenings in Iraq, such as

“Dirty squad” rumors

There are many unconfirmed rumors of “dirty squads,” composed of Americans and Iraqis who conduct assassinations across the city.

Some attribute these alleged death squads to the activity of private security firms using mercenaries.

Other Baghdadis report rumors of a squad run by American officials directly, that sends a mix of Iraqis and Americans in their hits. One Iraqi described these as rumors of the Americans operating in “the Israeli style,” in a way similar to Israel’s use of Palestinian mercenaries and informants to carry out assassinations of other Palestinians.

Another rumor holds that the alleged “dirty squads” are units of a shadowy Iraqi corps called Brigade 36, led by a Kurdish officer named Fadhil Jamil Burwari.

     and this

US forces manipulated?

Death squad rumors are circulating at high levels as well. In Hayy al-`Adil, an Iraqi MP apparently manipulated US forces into intervening in an Iraqi government raid on his offices by claiming that the Iraqi troops storming his facilities were a death squad.

Iraqi army forces surrounded and entered the offices of `Abd al-Nasir al-Jannabi, a Sunni religious shaykh and member of parliament, finding a cache of weapons. Jannabi called the US Army by telephone, claiming that the Iraqi troops raiding his office were death squads. According to Baghdad sources, US troops intervened on the scene, even forcing the Iraqi units to return confiscated weapons.

PM Maliki and MP Jannabi harbor longstanding animosity. In recent parliamentary remarks, Jannabi attacked Maliki heavily, to which Maliki replied to Jannabi by alleging that the government has a file proving Jannabi’s involvement in kidnappings, saying that an investigation was ongoing. The involvement of US forces in the dispute between them reflects just how dependent the US is on local tips for intelligence, which often allows locals to manipulate US military power to their own ends.

 

Technorati tags: Iraq, Death Squads, US Military, Mercanaries

 

U.S. Sides With Iran's Allies in Iraq Civil War

   Here's a nice little piece from Iraq Slogger which is saying that even if the surge in Iraq lowers the death count in Baghdad, the U.S. could be stuck in the country for decades, not just a few years, or months.

                  Iraq Slogger:     Entire Article

New Foreign Affairs Piece Urges U.S. Step Back From Conflict

 February 19,2007

James Fearon, professor of political science at Stanford:

"In fact, there is a civil war in progress in Iraq, one comparable in important respects to other civil wars that have occurred in postcolonial states with weak political institutions. Those cases suggest that the Bush administration's political objective in Iraq -- creating a stable, peaceful, somewhat democratic regime that can survive the departure of U.S. troops -- is unrealistic. Given this unrealistic political objective, military strategy of any sort is doomed to fail almost regardless of whether the administration goes with the "surge" option, as President George W. Bush has proposed, or shifts toward a pure training mission, as advised by the Iraq Study Group.

    As the ethnic cleansing of Baghdad proceeds, the weak Shiite-dominated government is inevitably becoming an open partisan in a nasty civil war between Sunni and Shiite Arabs. As a result, President Bush's commitment to making a "success" of the current government will increasingly amount to siding with the Shiites, a position that is morally dubious and probably not in the interest of either the United States or long-term regional peace and stability....

    As long as the Bush administration remains absolutely committed to propping up the government of Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki or a similarly configured successor, the U.S. government will have limited leverage with almost all of the relevant parties. By contrast, moving away from absolute commitment -- for example, by beginning to shift U.S. combat troops out of the central theaters -- would increase U.S. diplomatic and military leverage on almost all fronts. Doing so would not allow the current or the next U.S. administration to bring a quick end to the civil war, which most likely will last for some time. But it would allow the United States to play a balancing role between the combatants that would be more conducive to reaching, in the long run, a stable resolution in which Sunni, Shiite, and Kurdish interests are well represented in a decent Iraqi government. If the Iraqis ever manage to settle on the power-sharing agreement that is the objective of current U.S. policy, it will come only after bitter fighting in the civil war that is already under way."

 

Technorati tags: U.S., Iraq, Iraq Civil War, Iran