Be INFORMED

Monday, February 26, 2007

Texas Governor Rick Perry Is Slow With Justice

James Waller from Dallas,Texas has spent half of his life in prison and on parole for a crime which he did not commit.

   He was convicted for raping a 12 year old boy back in 1982 based on the victim identifying Mr. Waller as the rapist even though Mr. Waller did not fit the profile from the victim.

   The young man told police that the rapist was a black man who stood at 5'8" while Mr.Waller is 6'4". that is quite a difference. It turns out that Mr. Waller was one of only a few black men that lived in his neighborhood so I guess that he was easy pickings for the Dallas police and the prosecutor as it took a jury only 46 minutes to find Mr. Waller guilty of the crime.

   Anyway, DNA evidence has cleared Mr. Waller. It would be alot easier for him if Governor Perry would get off his ass and sign off on Mr. Waller's exoneration so that Mr. Waller can get his name back officially and get on with his life.

CNN  Thursday, February 22, 2007                                         Today, Waller has a job, a college degree that he obtained while in prison, and helps feed the homeless on his own time. But he still doesn't officially have his name back. That's because under Texas law, the governor has to sign off on the exoneration to make it official. Six weeks have gone by since the judge's declaration of innocence, and there is no timetable yet from Governor Rick Perry's office.

A spokeswoman for Gov. Perry says, "There is no time frame in which the governor has to act."
So while Waller waits and wonders why the governor is taking so long, he is planning for the future. He hopes to leave Texas (he's not allowed to leave now because he is still on parole) and wants to remarry and have a child someday.

   All that Governor Perry has to do is sign the paperwork so that Mr. Waller's parole ends. What is so complicated about that? Six weeks and the governor still hasn't taken any action on this.

 

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Military Aid To Pakistan

    It would seem that the United States has been giving that country quite a bit of hardware and cash for Pakistan's minimal war on terror.

World Policy

The United States imposed sanctions on rivals India and Pakistan after their 1998 "tit for tat" nuclear tests, prohibiting the export of goods listed on the U.S. Munitions List, military financing and the transfer of certain military technologies.

But the sanctions were lifted in the aftermath of the terrorist attacks in September 2001 when Washington sought allies for the war on terrorism. In the years since the attacks, Pakistan and India have benefited from billions of dollars in new military aid, training and weaponry.

Soon after September 11th, President Bush judged that the sanctions imposed on Pakistan "would not be in the national security interests of the United States." Thus, in early November 2001, the U.S. agreed to provide Pakistan with $73 million in "border security" military hardware, including Huey helicopters and spare parts for F-16 fighter planes.

At the end of March 2005, President Bush reversed 15 years of policy begun under his father by offering F-16 fighter planes to Islamabad. Initially, Pakistan plans on buying two dozen of the Lockheed Martin manufactured planes, but Bush administration officials note there would be no limits on how many could eventually be purchased. Pakistan’s economy is not strong enough to allow Musharraf to purchase the $35 million per copy fighter planes, and so the deal will be accompanied by about $3 billion in military aid.

Major increases in military aid accompany these plans for new weapons and technology sales. In 2002, Pakistan was granted $75 million in FMF, the country’s first grant in more than 10 years. In 2003, the nation’s FMF totaled $49.5 million, supplemented by an anti-terrorism grant of $175 million. For 2004, FMF totaled $74.5 million with no supplemental appropriation. Another $148 million was allocated in 2005, and President Bush is requesting $300 million for 2006.

Thus, Pakistan will have accumulated a total of $821 million in FMF support between 2002 (when FMF was resumed) and 2005. Additionally, military training funds are on the rise- from zero in 2001 to a $2 million request for 2006.

   On Pakistan and their support of the Taliban;

While Pakistan has made significant contributions to the war against terrorism, arresting a number of high-value al-Qaeda operatives, the report found that "the Taliban’s ability to provide bin Laden a haven in the face of international pressure and UN sanctions was significantly facilitated by Pakistani support."

According to another report from the Congressional Research Service, Pakistan has turned a blind eye to the Taliban and other militants who use its porous border regions as a launching pad for attacks against U.S., NATO and Afghani troops. The report, Afghanistan: Post War Governance, Security and U.S. Policy notes that "U.S. and Afghan officials continue to accuse Pakistan of allowing Taliban fighters to meet and group in Pakistani cities."

An anonymous Western diplomat, quoted in the New York Times, was more colorful, saying "if you talk about the Taliban, its like fish in a barrel in Pakistan. They train, they rest there. They get support. "

   This is more of the American taxpayers hard earned money getting wasted by the Bush Crime Family in order to give the manufacturers of our military hardware a little extra cash at the bottom line.

   Most of the info above is old news, but I put it up as a reminder of how Bush is robbing us blind and funding countries that have no democracy except in name only but have many human rights abuses.

    The Democratic congress should cut this funding to Pakistan totally or at least cut it in half. Throw India in there while you are at it.

 

Technorati tags: , ,

 

Ads by AdGenta.com