Be INFORMED

Sunday, April 01, 2007

Hicks Sentencing done Without Prosecutors Knowledge

     Here is a bit more on Australian David M. Hicks nine month sentence.

  We already know that he has a one year gag order and that he waved the right to sue the any of his captors.

   But the Washington Post reports that this deal was made Susan J. Crawford, top military commission official, instead of going to the prosecutors.

Marine Maj. Michael "Dan" Mori, representing Hicks, took his plea negotiations to Susan J. Crawford, the top military commission official, rather than dealing with prosecutors who were seeking a lengthy penalty, according to both sides in the case. In what became a highly politicized situation involving the Australian government, Crawford allowed Hicks a short sentence in exchange for a year-long gag order, a guarantee that he will not allege illegal treatment at the hands of his U.S. captors, and a waiver of any right to appeal or sue.

Though Australian officials have said they were not directly involved in plea negotiations, Mori declined to answer questions about what, if any, influence they had. Australian Prime Minister John Howard, up for reelection this year, has been under public pressure to bring Hicks home. He turned to Vice President Cheney to implore that the case be resolved. Crawford was the Defense Department's inspector general from 1989 to 1991, when Cheney was defense secretary.

"What an amazing coincidence that, with an election in Australia by the end of the year, he gets nine months and he is gagged for 12 months from talking about it," said Australian lawyer Lex Lasry, who was in Cuba to monitor the case over the past week.

As the deal developed in recent weeks, Air Force Col. Morris Davis, the lead prosecutor for military commissions, and his team on the Hicks case were not in the loop. Davis said he learned about the plea agreement Monday morning when the plea papers were presented to him, and he said the prosecution team was unaware that discussions had been taking place.

"We got it before lunchtime, before the first session," Davis said at a news conference Friday night. In an interview later, he said the approved sentence of nine months shocked him. "I wasn't considering anything that didn't have two digits," he said, referring to a sentence of at least 10 years.  Read More

   So it would seem that Bush isn't so tough on terrorist if they happen to come from countries that are United States allies. Don't think for a minute that the White House didn't approve of this crap.

Tags:

Saturday, March 31, 2007

Bush's Troop ' Surge ' In Iraq Going Just Fine. NOT!

   According to the Associated Press the United States suffered almost twice as many military casualties as the Iraqi army did in March.

Associated Press count

U.S. military: 81 deaths

Iraqi military: 44 deaths

Iraqi figures: 165 Iraqi police deaths

AP count: 3,246 U.S. troops killed in Iraq since March 2003

Iraqi civilian deaths: 1,872 says the Iraqi ministry  

* * * *

   So if the Bush clan  says that the ' surge '  is working in Iraq, they must be referring to the deaths of the U.S. troops being higher than the Iraqis.

   If more troops are getting killed than are the Iraqis,then a few things are going on here.

  1 ) Our troops are showing up for work and the Iraqis aren't.

  2 ) Our troops are not quite as good as the Iraqi troops are

    We all know that the United States troops are showing up for work and that they are doing the majority of the fighting. That is a given no matter what those hoods in the White House and Fox News will tell you.

   We certainly know that the United States troops are much better than the Iraqi troops will ever be, so that leaves one other choice.

  The Iraqi troops aren't doing jack shit! Period! If the Iraqis were taking the lead in their own country then they would be pushing up daisies at a higher rate than U.S. troops are.

   We are slightly better armed and equipped ( ? ) than our host is yet we still get knocked off more than they do? There is something wrong with this picture.

   The word is that the United States is going after Iran very soon ( April 6 ), and if this is even close to right, which I doubt, then we will all get to watch the presidents ' surge ' in action.

    More ' surge ' in troops and more  ' surge ' in U.S. casualties.

   Thanks George!

Tags: