Be INFORMED

Thursday, April 19, 2007

A Letter From Anonymous Justice Department Employees To The Investigating committees

    The House and Senate Judiciary Committees got a letter  from some anonymous Justice Department employees concerning politics at the department.

      You can go here for the full letter in PDF. Meantime, here are a few excerpts.

Dear Messrs. Chairman,

Many of us in the Department of Justice have been watching with admiration as you expose the overly political firing of United States Attorneys and hope that you can help in returning our beloved Department to of establishing justice in the United States. We are equally concerned, however, about the politicizing of the non-political ranks of Justice employees, offices which are consistently and methodically being eroded by partisan politics.

Many employees within the Department’s litigating divisions are sitting quietly by, hoping that you will investigate what has happened to the Attorney General’s Honors Program and even the Summer Law Intern Program (SLIP). You are surely aware that the Attorney General’s Honors Program has a long history of hiring top students from a variety of law schools, and it is the only way that young lawyers are able to come into the Department immediately after law school. This year the divisions once again pored over applications and resumes, choosing students to interview who demonstrated not only excellent grades but a real interest in the areas of law they might be hired to work in. After choosing potential candidates to interview, the division personnel forwarded their lists to the Office of Attorney Recruitment Management for what was traditionally final approval. This is no longer a final step, however, because the list had to go higher - to the Office of the Deputy Attorney General. When the list of potential interviewees was returned this year, it had been cut dramatically.

...When division personnel staff later compared the remaining interviewees with the candidates struck form the list, one common denominator appeared repeatedly: most of those struck form the list had interned for a Hill Democrat, clerked for a Democratic judge, worked for a “liberal” cause, or otherwise appeared to have “liberal” leanings. Summa cum laude graduates of both Yale and Harvard were rejected for interviews....

...While the current political appointees repeatedly remind everyone that the U.S. Attorneys “serve at the pleasure of the President,” the Department’s career attorneys serve the people of the United States. We hope you will see fit to include this politicizing of the career ranks in your questioning of Attorney General Gonzales and his staff.

Thank you.

A Group of Concerned Department of Justice Employees

Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, Jr. in response to the letter, had this to say.

“I take any accusations of undue politicization of career staff seriously. We have already identified concerns in Department’s Civil Rights Division. These new accusations are clearly something we will want to consider as well.”

Source

   Bear in mind the letter was delivered yesterday. Gonzo hit the stand to testify today. He should just save the taxpayers what little money we have left and resign.

 

Tags:

Bush To Veto District of Columbia Bill?

       In legislation which was passed by the House ( 241-177 ), Washington, D.C. gets one step closer to having voting rights. But as is usual, the White House says that the bill will be veto' d because it is unconstitutional according the the Hoods on the Hill. This is one time though, that they may be right, unfortunately.

   My biggest gripe with this is why is the White House so concerned with the constitutionality of a bill since they generally pay no attention to the Constitution on the majority of matters when it comes to law and rights?

   It is just an outdated piece of paper so far as they are concerned which they have strived to replace with the GOP declaration of dictatorship.

The bill would permanently increase full House membership to 437, giving the largely Democratic half-million residents of the district a seat and adding a temporary at-large seat for Republican-leaning Utah. The House has consisted of 435 seats since 1960.     Yahoo News

   I would say that it is that largely Democratic party of residents which concerns the Republican establishment the most.

   If the Constitution is correct in forbidding this, then this needs to be changed.

 

Tags: