Nuke Iran and Save the GOP?

   Only Jon McCain could come up with something like this, if needed.

Published on Saturday, May 5, 2007 by the Guardian/UK

  Crossposted From Common Dreams

Saved by the Bomb: Senator McCain has Hit Upon a Solution to All the Republican Party’s Woes: A Nuclear War with Iran

by Terry Jones

Campaigning in Oklahoma the other day, the Republican senator John McCain was asked what should be done about Iran. He responded by singing, “Bomb bomb bomb bomb bomb Iran”, to the tune of the Beach Boys’ Barbara Ann. (Join the hilarity and see for yourself on YouTube.) How can any thinking person disagree? I mean, any country with a president who doesn’t shave properly and never wears a tie deserves what’s coming to it - a lot of American bombs, with a few British ones thrown in to ensure we don’t miss out on the ensuing upsurge in terrorism.

The problem is how to unload enough bombs on Iran before next year’s US election to bring about enough flag-waving to get the Republican party re-elected. This is essential if we are to safeguard the revenues of companies such as Halliburton - particularly at a time when the special inspector general for Iraq reconstruction is discovering what a shoddy job Halliburton has been doing. In projects at Nasiriya, Mosul and Hilla - declared successes by the US - inspectors have discovered buckled floors, crumbling concrete, failed generators and blocked sewage systems - due not to sabotage but largely to poor construction and lack of maintenance.

The trouble is that the re-election of the GOP is becoming more problematic as opinion turns against George Bush’s little invasion of Iraq. Even Saudi Arabia’s King Abdullah recently condemned the US action as “an illegal foreign occupation”; his nephew, Prince Bandar, hasn’t been returning calls for weeks.

More worrying is the plummeting popularity of the party, as White House corruption becomes ever more difficult to disguise. The LA Times reports that what Representative Thomas M Davis III called a “poisonous” environment has begun to dent fundraising - an unheard-of problem for the Republicans.

So the only solution is to bomb Iran, as Senator McCain so wisely and amusingly suggests. The real issue is whether to use regular weapons or do the job properly and go nuclear.

Nuclear bombs have the advantage of being much bigger, and they will also pollute vast swathes of Iran and make much of the country uninhabitable for years. With a bit of luck some of the fallout will sweep into Iraq and finish off the job the US and UK have begun without incurring more costs.

But the biggest advantage of nuclear weapons is that the repercussions would be so enormous, the upsurge in terrorism so overwhelming, that the world would be totally changed. A year before 9/11, Paul Wolfowitz and Lewis “Scooter” Libby signed a statement for the Project for the New American Century, a neoconservative thinktank. They rather hoped for “some catastrophic and catalysing event like a new Pearl Harbor” to kickstart their dream of a world run by US military might. A nuclear war would do the trick in spades. The Republican party could expect to stay in power for the next 50 or even 100 years.

Of course, a large proportion of the human race could be wiped out in the process, but that shouldn’t be a problem as long as there are anti-radiation suits for White House and Pentagon staff. Such a shake-up would give the US a golden opportunity to corner what’s left of the world’s oil reserves.

In 1955 Albert Einstein and Bertrand Russell said the world was faced by a “stark and dreadful and inescapable” choice: “Shall we put an end to the human race; or shall mankind renounce war?” Senator McCain wasn’t bothered by such questions; the human race may be standing on a precipice, but the Republicans have a chance of permanent re-election.

Terry Jones is a film director, actor and Python. Terry-jones.net

© Guardian News and Media Limited 2007

Tags: John McCain Iran GOP nuclear weapons

I.G.s, Snow Jobs and More Dubya Talk

From  Jeff Huber

Friday, May 04, 2007

Woe is you if you land a plumb appointee job in the Bush administration and decide to take your job and your oath of office more seriously than you take loyalty to the Bush administration. Stuart W. Bowen, Jr., Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction, whose investigations of waste and corruption in Iraq have repeatedly embarrassed the Bush administration, is now under investigation himself.
How about them bad apples?
According to James Glanz of the New York Times , both the White House and a spokesman for Congressman Thomas M. Davis (R-Virginia) say the investigations "were not started in retribution for the work undertaken in Iraq by Mr. Bowen." But, Glanz adds…

…the investigations are coming to light just a few months after Mr. Bowen’s office narrowly escaped what amounted to a termination clause tucked away in a large military authorization bill by staff members of another Republican congressman. A bipartisan group of lawmakers later managed to reverse that provision, but the latest action has renewed suspicions that Mr. Bowen--a Republican himself--has come to be seen as a serious political liability by his own party.

The investigation, according to Glanz, "originated with a complaint put together by roughly half a dozen former employees who appear to have left his office on unhappy terms." From whom did Glanz glean this information? "…Several officials familiar with the case, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the investigation is still going on."
Anonymous officials. How convenient. How familiar. Here's testimony from another anonymous source:

One of the former employees who filed the complaint, who spoke on the condition of anonymity out of concern that he would face reprisals, agreed that all of those who brought the misconduct accusations had been unhappy with demotions, terminations or other sanctions during their time in the inspector general’s office.

Reprisals? This "former employee" either quit or got canned. What kinds of reprisals is he worried about? The kind that might come about if he doesn't help the Bush administration put a muzzle on Inspector General Bowen?
The investigation of Bowen is being conducted by "…an oversight committee with close links to the White House and by the ranking Republican on the House Government Reform Committee." That ranking Republican would be Thomas M. Davis. Funny thing about Thomas M. Davis. Back in 2004 when he was chairman of the House Government Reform Committee, Davis and his staff knew about the problems at Walter Reed hospital. His staff supposedly made phone and fielded phone calls on the issue, but Davis never pressed other congressional committees or Republican leaders to pass legislation or make money available to address the issue. Why not?
“We are not appropriators," Davis said. "I don’t know what else we could have done. If generals don’t go around and look at the barracks, how do you legislate that?”
Tommy, can you hear this? As members of Congress, especially the House of Representatives, you are appropriators. In fact, you're the only appropriators. And Article I of the Constitution assigns the power "To make rules for the government and regulation of the land and naval forces" to the legislature. So how is it you couldn't appropriate money to fix the problems at Walter Reed or pass a law that ordered a general to get up off his duffel bag and look at what was happening across the street from his sumptuous, government provided quarters?
A spokesman for Tom Davis says that politics played no role in the decision to investigate Inspector General Bowen, but one has to cast a skeptical eye at that claim in light of the fact that Bowen is seen as a potential political candidate in Davis's home state of Virginia.
Snow Jobs and Dubya Talk
Don't get the idea, though, that the Bowen investigation will be conducted by a congressional committee. Oh, no. The investigating council is drawn from the executive branch, and its chairman is Clay Johnson III, a longtime friend of one George W. Bush.
But that makes no never mind, as Bush administration mouthpiece Tony Snow tells it. Snow says the council is “an independent investigative organization” that doesn't follow the White House's direction. “The White House has no role in this, zero,” Snow says.
Yeah, right.
Snow also says that the council's investigation is being conducted by inspector generals from throughout the administration, and that Clay Johnson "is not, in fact, involved in the process.”
Clay Johnson is chairman of the council but he's not involved in the process? What in the wide world of sports, arts and sciences?
I once thought that despite its deplorable record over the past six years, I didn't want to see the GOP go completely down the sink for the sake of preserving a two party system. But I've changed my mind. For the foreseeable future, if I have a choice between Bugs Bunny and a Republican, I'm pulling the lever for the wabbit.
#
Commander Jeff Huber, U.S. Navy (Retired) writes from Virginia Beach, Virginia. Read his commentaries at Pen and Sword.

Tags: Stuart W. Bowen, Jr. GOP White House Tony Snow inspector general