The FISA Fight

   Time to send this Protect ATT bill back to the Senate.

         Original

FISA Fight: Back to the Senate

by mcjoan Wed Apr 16, 2008

While it's definitely been back-burnered, FISA and the determination of the Bush administration to get amnesty is still simmering away. The pressure is still out there to get the Rockefeller/Cheney bill passed. The primary reason it hasn't passed yet is because of all of you. You stood behind Chris Dodd back in December, and helped put enough pressure on the Senate to delay action. That bought enough time to strategize and to build public pressure to get us to where we are today--with a House that is still holding firm against amnesty. But the Senate is definitely feeling some heat from the other side.

Responding to that pressure, Judiciary Chairs Leahy and Conyers are asking for our help to push back.

Last month, the U.S. House of Representatives passed a strong and balanced FISA bill, legislation that protects America's national security while defending civil liberties -- without granting retroactive immunity to phone companies. Retroactive immunity would abet the Bush-Cheney Administration's efforts to avoid accountability for its actions.

This was a tremendous accomplishment -- and would not have been possible without the hard work and support from engaged citizens like you. The fight for a fair FISA bill has been waged all across the country: in the halls of Congress, on progressive political blogs, in newspaper editorial pages, on the public airwaves, and around dinner tables and water coolers from coast-to-coast.

But there's still much work to do. Now that the House has passed a fair FISA bill, it's time to turn our attention back to the Senate -- and we hope you'll join us in urging our Senate colleagues to sign on to the strong FISA legislation the House passed just last month.

We've already seen the impact of grassroots activity on the FISA debate. Your emails, phone calls, blog posts, and letters-to-the-editor -- including more than 1,700 letters written in response to our call last month alone -- really do make a huge difference.

Now we need your help to make sure that our colleagues in the Senate know that the American people are watching -- and that they want a FISA bill that protects our national security, preserves our civil liberties, and refuses retroactive immunity to telecom companies.

First the Bush-Cheney Administration tried to bully the House into accepting its own deeply flawed FISA legislation. Then White House officials and Congressional Republicans refused to meet with us to hammer out a better bill. And then the President and his allies blocked our attempts to temporarily extend existing surveillance legislation -- incredibly blaming Democrats for their own efforts to let the legislation expire.

Despite all of this bullying, cajoling, and foot-dragging, we're proud that our House Democratic colleagues stood firm, refusing to water down the strong, balanced FISA bill that passed the House and is now on its way to the Senate.

Now we need your help to encourage our Democratic colleagues in the Senate to stand firm as well.

You know what to do. Use the form provided by Leahy and Conyers, and if you can, call and fax the Senators that we need to see the light. Tell them it's the House FISA bill or nothing.

Contact info

Democrats

• Bayh (202) 224-5623 phone, (202) 228-1377 fax
• Byrd (202) 224-3954 phone, (202) 228-0002 fax
• Carper (202) 224-2441 phone, (202) 228-2190 fax
• Clinton (202) 224-4451 phone, (202) 228-0282 fax
• Feinstein (202) 224-3841 phone, (202) 228-3954 fax
• Inouye (202) 224-3934 phone, (202) 224-6747 fax
• Johnson (202) 224-5842 phone, (605) 341-2207 fax
• Kohl (202) 224-5653 (202) 224-9787
• Landrieu (202)224-5824 phone, (202) 224-9735 fax
• Lincoln (202) 224-4843 phone, (202) 228-1371 fax
• McCaskill (202) 224-6154 phone, (202) 228-6326 fax
• Mikulski (202) 224-4654 phone,  (202) 224-8858 fax
• Nelson (FL) (202) 224-5274 phone, (202) 228-2183 fax
• Nelson (NE) (202) 224-6551 phone, (202) 228-0012 fax
• Obama (202) 224-2854 phone, (202) 228-4260 fax
• Pryor (202) 224-2353 phone, (202) 228-0908 fax
• Rockefeller, (202) 224-6472 phone, (202) 224-7665 fax
• Salazar (202) 224-5852 phone, (202) 228-5036 fax
• Stabenow (202) 224-4822 phone, (202) 228-0325 fax

Republicans (and other)

• Chambliss (202) 224-3521 phone, (202) 224-0103 fax
• Coleman (202) 224-5641 phone, (202) 224-1152 fax
• Collins (202) 224-2523 phone, (202) 224-2693 fax
• Dole (202) 224-6342 phone, (202) 224-1100 fax
• Graham (202) 224-5972 phone, (202) 224-3808 fax
• Lieberman (202) 224-4041 phone, (202) 224-9750 fax
• McCain (202) 224-2235 phone, (202) 228-2862 fax
• Smith (202) 224-3753 phone, (202) 228-3997 fax
• Snowe (202) 224-5344 phone, (202) 224-1946 fax
• Specter (202) 224-4254 phone, (202) 228-1229 fax
• Sununu (202) 224-2841 phone, (202) 228-4131 fax
• Warner (202) 224-2023 phone, (202) 224-6295 fax

Technorati Tags: FISA,telecom amnesty,Protect America Act,Senate,Illegal Wiretaps,Patrick Leahy,John Conyers

Most Say Hillary Clinton Not Trustworthy

  As if you and I did not know this already, a new poll from Washington Post-ABC News says that Senator Clinton is rated as " honest and trustworthy " by only 39 percent of the American public which is a 13 percent drop since May of 2006.

Nearly six in 10 said in the new poll that she is not honest and trustworthy. And now, compared with Obama, Clinton has a deep trust deficit among Democrats, trailing him by 23 points as the more honest, an area on which she once led both Obama and John Edwards.

Among Democrats, 63 percent called her honest, down 18 points from 2006; among independents, her trust level has dropped 13 points, to 37 percent. Republicans held Clinton in low regard on this in the past (23 percent called her honest two years ago), but it is even lower now, at 16 percent. Majorities of men and women now say the phrase does not apply to Clinton; two years ago, narrow majorities of both did.   Washington Post

  I would guess that the Republicans have known what a low-life Hillary Clinton is from years gone by, not that they would hold to many Democrats in high esteem to begin with. For the rest of us, Hillary has shown us her true colors and her win at all cost mantra does not help her either. She acts more like a Republican mud-slinger than she does a Democrat.

   Both Hillary Clinton and that sad-sack husband of hers should be tossed out of government for the rest of their miserable lives.

Technorati Tags: Hillary Clinton,Democrats,ABC-News,polls,Barack Obama