Be INFORMED

Friday, January 02, 2009

The Middle East To George Bush: Get The Hell Out Of Here!

  You all know that Resident Bush took his farewell tour to both Iraq and Afghanistan a little while back.  In Iraq, he was greeted as a liberator with a sized ten shoe thrown at his head by a journalist. To bad the shoe missed.

  From Watching America we get a read on the thoughts of someone from Egypt on Bush's tour to the region.

Al Ahram, Egypt
Get the Hell
Out of Here!

By Salwa Habib
How can the departing American president believe that anyone in Iraq would want to see him for the last time? Isn’t he satisfied with the war crimes he committed?
Translated By Asmaa Sharaf El Deen
21 December 2008

edited by Lauren Abuouf

Egypt - Al Ahram - Original Article (Arabic)
From now until his departure on January 20th, President Bush needs to spare himself the trouble of performing “false” tasks and duties.
It is useless and does harm to him and his country.
Last month, and at the APEC summit with Asia’s leaders, Bush looked alone, confused, pale and rejected—exactly like a “lame duck”.
But who suggested that he secretly visit Iraq and Afghanistan to bid the two countries farewell, countries that suffered under the yoke of war, all because of his catastrophic policies.
Did he miss being a newsmaker?
Or did he go there to celebrate a false "victory," a security pact rejected by all Iraqis, or to harp on a tailored democracy, freedom, which only brought about disaster, death and destruction?
How can the departing American president believe that anyone in Iraq would want to see him for the last time?
Isn’t he satisfied with the war crimes he committed?
Obviously, his visit was meant solely to shamelessly defend a war that claimed more than 500,000 victims, and to announce that the war is still going on.
This, undeniably, ignited a volcano of anger, aggravation, and hatred in a way hard to condemn, when Arab public opinion rightly regarded it an astonishing victory for Iraq and all Arabs.
In fact, Bush was lucky that none of his soldiers in Camp Victory, where he went afterwards, was bold enough to stand up and refute his repeated lies and accusations about the late Iraqi President Saddam, and bold enough to remind him that he was responsible for the American invasion of Iraq, claiming that the war was necessary for fighting terror.
Instead, Bush ought to have expressed his sorrow and regret about the blunders of the CIA, and about claims that Iraq possessed Weapons of Mass Destruction, and for the horrible mistakes, and lies, he and his administration made.
Then, during his last visit to Afghanistan, Bush was not even shot when he talked about the thriving democracy there. I wonder what kind of democracy can develop in an environment of violence and unprecedented chaos!
Please, Mr. Bush, go to the White House, your temporary home, and shut yourself inside it. No one wishes to bid you farewell, not even the Americans themselves, because of the shame you have brought upon them.

Thursday, January 01, 2009

New Years Day Follies:Blagojevich-Burris

by BarbinMD    Thu Jan 01, 2009

If Rod Blagojevich's motivation for naming Roland Burris as Barack Obama's replacement in the U.S. Senate was to take the glare of media attention off of himself, he's succeeded beyond his wildest dreams. Here's a brief recap of yesterday's events in this soap opera.

  • We had the Illinois Secretary of State Jesse White refuse to accept the letter from Blagojevich, naming Burris to the U.S. Senate. White said he will not certify the appointment, he won't change his mind, and that:

    You can take it to the bank. I will not move.

    And while White insisted that he would hold firm, his spokesman later admitted that White knew he couldn't stop the appointment, but he wanted to "make a statement." And with Harry Reid's office saying that the lack of a signature might be grounds to refuse to seat Burris, it seems that White's statement may have some teeth.

  • Burris reacted by saying he was sorry for the position White was in, expressed admiration for him, and said that "we'll work through this." Then he headed to court to ask the Illinois Supreme Court to force White to certify his appointment.
  • Meanwhile, Senate Democrats:

    ... have a "Plan B" to keep Burris from being sworn in, regardless how the Illinois Supreme Court rules ... if presented with Burris’ appointment, they are likely to give the Rules Committee 90 days to determine the propriety of it ... That should be enough so the senators won’t have to act to prevent Burris from joining the chamber. Blagojevich’s defiance inflamed Illinois legislators, speeding up the impeachment process.

  • But Burris has plans of his own:

    Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich's choice to take Barack Obama's Senate seat plans to be in Washington next week when new senators are sworn in, but he won't make a scene if he's turned away by Senate leaders who object to his appointment.

  • And that should be fun, because:

    Should Burris appear in Washington without that certification, armed police officers stand ready to bar him from the Senate floor, said a Democratic official briefed on  Senate leaders' plans.

  • And if that wouldn't be a big enough made-for-TV moment, there's also the possibility that Blagojevich, with floor privileges as a sitting Governor, will escort Burris to the swearing-in ceremony. According to a spokesman for Blagojevich, he hasn't decided if he will accompany Burris to Washington.

Of course, Burris may be too big to be accompanied by a mere governor these days. After all, here's Roland Burris on what is emerging as his favorite subject, Roland Burris:

"I am a visionary," he declared in a 2002 interview with the Sun-Times when he was running for governor, his third unsuccessful try at the job.

In a 1994 interview with the paper, during his first effort at capturing the governor's office, Burris said his past success ... was "divine providence" that began at age 15...

"People said I was either crazy or divinely directed. I accept the latter," he said. "I believe without a doubt that I am predestined to be a role model."

It's probably not too much of a leap to assume that comments like that are why he has been described as:

...a disagreeable mediocrity as a politician.

Voters have rightly rejected him numerous times in his bids for higher office—governor, U.S. senator, mayor of Chicago—because he's at least six parts ego to one part performance...

And with the taint of the Rod Blagojevich scandal, there's one more reason to reject this bid for higher office.          Original Article