Be INFORMED

Friday, July 22, 2011

America The Beautiful, NEW LOW PRICE!

by Fed up Fed          Wed Jul 20, 2011

Some time back, in the early aughts, I worked as a shelf stocker for Safeway.  Scintillating work that it was, my mind yet wandered to other things as my hands repeated the same motions thousands of times a night, open box, grip can, stack can, grip and stack, grip and stack, open the next box, on through the dark.  As I worked, an observation struck me that seemed at once profound and profoundly pernicious.  And it seems, as we grow ever more entombed in partisan rhetoric and entitlement cut kabuki, the thing I learned about people in my ten years in the grocery business seems particulalry relevant to me now.

As a matter of pragmatism, shelf stockers and tag girls -- for some reason every file maintenance clerk, tag changer, I ever worked with was a woman -- worked the same shifts on ad change night.  It occurred to me, after some time, that whenever the girls changed the shelf tags, they left behind a flurry of special promotional tags that proclaimed "NEW LOW PRICE!"

Of course, promotional tags being hyperbolic by nature, I took no particular offense at their tone, but something about them did bother me a bit, and after a while, my minimal cognitive abilities kicked out an answer: the prices were higher.  They were charging more for those items, not less.  The tags advertised a new price, that much was true, and the term "low" is certainly subjective enough that it's open to interpretation.  But it seemed then, as now, that declaiming the price you just raised a "NEW LOW PRICE," well, that's just dishonest.  But it works in marketing, mainly because it turns out that people will, with only a little encouragement, make economic decisions that don't really make any sense, but that can only charitably be described as, "Good enough."

Marketers know a lot about this concept.  They even have a word for it: satisficing.  It's the idea that rational decisions are hard, while seeking a sense of adequacy minimizes the anxiety of risk and the pain of loss (satisfaction + suffice = satisfice).  It's the reason why a simple little sticker can ease the pain of a price increase by reassuring the customer that it's still low, despite their lying eyes.  And it works quite well at boosting sales for off-sale items, as customers satisfice themselves with mediocrity rather than do the hard math of maximizing their purchasing power and shopping for actual, rather than perceived, value.

Seeking customer satisficing rather than providing value now dominates retail because it works really, really well.  As a matter of fact, as a matter of record, it works just as well in politics.

The American Dream is a Promotional Sticker

In America, we used to do big things.  In my grandfather's day, no challenge daunted us, no height impressed us, and no depth ever sunk us.  We did big things in big ways, and we did them because great strength requires constant tests.  So we sought out the feats no sane nation could tackle, and that's the thing we did.  It's why we cut a sea lane across 50 miles of jungle, losing 30,000 men along the way.  It's why we corked the Colorado River with the largest dam in human history while simultaneously flailing our way through the greatest economic disaster of all time.  And of course, of course, it's why we went to the moon and did that other thing, not because it was easy, but because it was hard.  We were hard, and no test of our mettle could break us because we would not relent and the world would bend to our will.

We used to do things only because they were hard and because we were tough.  I say used to because, though that blood still pumps in our veins and the potential still plays about our heads in our wilder moments, we've grown timid and soft, complacent in our wealth, callous in our fortunate height.  We used to do the hard thing, but some time ago we discovered a fondness for easy and cheap wins.  We don't do the hard thing, the big thing.  We go out of our way not to.

September 1, 2001, 9/11, was a unifying moment of national outrage at an audacious slaughter of fantastic proportions.  It was followed by a time of deep pride and unstinting admiration for those implausible souls who died running into the smoke, and the rescue workers, an unlikely mix of cops and steelworkers and soldiers, whose faces on every magazine cover bore a dark patina of the dust that would later turn their lungs into rock.  In our greater days, when we did those big things, this would have been the moment when all our eyes turned from the empty machinations of soulless men who saw only opportunity in our tragedy.

But that would have been hard, and so we sat complacent while our leaders plotted the greatest heist in human history while distracting us all by bombarding a nation of goatherding religious zealots.  And because the money was so sweet, the pickings so plump, they put another fireworks display on our teevees and stole more and more from our treasury and thinned the herd at the same time, and all in the name of doing the easy thing endorsed by almost all of us.

And still those wars rage on while our kids die for whatever, and now most of us are clamoring once again to do the easy thing and pull away from commitments we made the day the first bomb dropped.  And meanwhile our country is wealthier than ever, but only at the top, and the debate somehow centers on how much to harm the poor and the old and the very young, because asking those very few who have benefitted from a lost decade to help put our nation back upright is some concoction of every sin imagined or invented by men whose grasp on our nation's greatness can be summed up in a Lee Greenwood song, and no deeds of any sort.

We used to do the big things.  We fed the poor, cared for the sick.  We built grand monuments to our greatness, but we also put profound energy into the least of us.  There were days when we knew that a great nation is measured by how well its poorest citizens lived.  And so we did the big things and we fought poverty where it lived and we spread wealth around to all who would work for it, and we finally realized Herbert Hoover's dream of a chicken in every pot and a car in every garage, and that was the biggest of all the big things we ever did, bar none.

But we don't do the big things anymore.  Now we say we're broke, we have other things we need to do, we can't help every poor soul not blessed to have emerged into the world with the correct family and the best of circumstances.  We do the small things, the least of things.  In today's America, we eschew the grand, shoot for the petty.  We don't plant the flag on the moon, we fly it from our car antenna.  We don't build grand structures, we let them crumble and fall.  We don't do the big thing, or the hard thing, we do the thing that comes first and easiest.

And that is the great tragedy of a great nation whose better days are only behind it by sheer force of will and a little known thing called satisficing.  Jesus wept.

Originally posted to Fed up Fed on Wed Jul 20, 2011
Also republished by Community Spotlight.

 

Thursday, July 21, 2011

U.S. Debt Ceiling Problem Solved

   It has been quite awhile now that the Republicans and the White House have been going at each others throats over the debt ceiling with the GOP wanting to add cuts to a few of the “ entitlement programs “ before they will pass any deal. At the same time, Obama and the Democrats are trying to get some of those tax cuts for the wealthy off of the books. I believe that Obama will somewhat cave in once again since he has gotten use to being at the Wall Street/Corporate trough.

   I have a simple solution that would not only help with the governments debt problem, but it would also make both the Democrats and the Republicans issues moot.

  My solution?    EraseYourDebt.com   Problem solved!

  Now where is my finders fee?

Debt Negotiations

 

Copyright © 2011 Creators Syndicate

Copyright © 2011 Creators Syndicate

Voter Fraud? Are The Republicans The Fraudsters?

  Republicans are always harping about having tougher voting laws in place in order to curb their non-existent voter fraud issues.

   Let’s go back to the year 2004 and the Busch election.

New Evidence in 2004 Election Theft

by 1Watt Hermit     Wed Jul 20, 2011

A new filing in the King Lincoln Bronzeville Neighborhood Association v. Blackwell shows how the RNC transferred the votes from Ohio to RNC servers in Tennessee.

Via:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/...

A new filing in the King Lincoln Bronzeville v. Blackwell case includes a copy of the Ohio Secretary of State election production system configuration that was in use in Ohio's 2004 presidential election when there was a sudden and unexpected shift in votes for George W. Bush.

The filing also includes the revealing deposition of the late Michael Connell. Connell served as the IT guru for the Bush family and Karl Rove. Connell ran the private IT firm GovTech that created the controversial system that transferred Ohio's vote count late on election night 2004 to a partisan Republican server site in Chattanooga, Tennessee owned by SmarTech. That is when the vote shift happened, not predicted by the exit polls, that led to Bush's unexpected victory. Connell died a month and a half after giving this deposition in a suspicious small plane crash

.

Via:
http://www.freepress.org/...

Prior to the filing, Cliff Arnebeck, lead attorney in the King Lincoln case, exchanged emails with IT security expert Stephen Spoonamore. Arnebeck asked Spoonamore whether or not SmarTech had the capability to "input data" and thus alter the results of Ohio's 2004 election. Spoonamore responded: "Yes. They would have had data input capacities. The system might have been set up to log which source generated the data but probably did not."

Spoonamore explained that "they [SmarTech] have full access and could change things when and if they want."

Arnebeck specifically asked "Could this be done using whatever bypass techniques Connell developed for the web hosting function." Spoonamore replied "Yes."

Spoonamore concluded from the architectural maps of the Ohio 2004 election reporting system that, "SmarTech was a man in the middle. In my opinion they were not designed as a mirror, they were designed specifically to be a man in the middle."

A "man in the middle" is a deliberate computer hacking setup, which allows a third party to sit in between computer transmissions and illegally alter the data. A mirror site, by contrast, is designed as a backup site in case the main computer configuration fails.

Via:
http://moritzlaw.osu.edu/...

The last entry dated 7/15/11 links to a 259 page PDF for the complete filing.

This needs to be shouted from the roof tops to every MSM/blog/Politician in the country.

Hoping this is the nail in Rove's coffin.

Also republished by Three Star Kossacks.