Be INFORMED

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

Republicans Violate Voting Rights Act

      It seems that the Republicans are still up to old tricks in the state of Texas in order to keep their grip on power.

            http://www.star-telegram.com/...

Two bills are scheduled for debate Monday in the lower chamber: House Bill 218, which would require a photo ID along with a voter registration card to cast a ballot, and HB 626, which would require a certified copy of a birth certificate, passport or naturalization certificate to register to vote.

Opponents, who promise an intense floor fight, note that such requirements put undue hardships particularly on ethnic minorities, the elderly and the poor. They also say that these bills were introduced because these citizens are also believed to trend toward voting Democratic.

   This is at the stage of ridiculous! I haven't had a copy of my birth certificate in decades nor have I had a copy of my naturalization papers since I don't know when. I do have them now, just recently, but it took more than a few years to get most of this junk. You would not believe the cost that I had to incur for this shit and I've been a citizen for 45 years!

   Quite frankly, the Republican party needs to be done away with, period!

 

by McCamy Taylor  at Daily Kos
Mon Apr 23, 2007

Thanks to Ashcroft's non-enforcement and the climate of Anything Goes, election fraud reached epidemic proportion in 2004, with bogus voter registrations in which Democrats found their registration forms shredded, more questionable E-voting and, of course, Ohio Secretary of State Blackwell's blatant disregard of the Voting Right's Act.  He broke the law so many times, it was ludicrous---and the Department of Justice looked the other way in every single instance, because everything Blackwell had done favored the Attorney General's boss.

Now, thanks to this laissez-faire attitude, the gloves are off. State legislatures in the Carolinas, Georgia, Florida and Ohio have passed laws that violate the Voting Rights Act. Not only has the Department of Justice failed to act, it actually rubber stamped a photo ID law in Georgia that the federal courts later struck down as amounting to a poll tax. Secretaries of State in Ohio and California are actively disenfranchising voters--and no one is acting to defend the voter's rights. Not the Department of Justice, not the Republican controlled Congress.

The only federal governmental body left that seems to believe that the Voting Rights Act is still the law of the land is the judiciary. And even at the Supreme Court of the United States, it is a 5 to 4 decision. One more Justice, and the Voting Rights Act will be dead in our lifetime, whether or not Congress ratifies it again.  

http://journals.democraticundergroun...

 

Tags:  

Monday, April 23, 2007

Should Harry Reid And George Bush Wrestle At " SummerSlam " ?

   How I do wish that Tony Snow was back as his job doing the White House press briefings! Dana Perino just flat out annoys me.

  Today we are going to look as some of her briefing from this afternoon.

"The president is vetoing the bill to provide money for soldiers -- readiness, health care, armaments, etc and a timeline to get out of Iraq."

 

            White House Press Briefing   April 23, 2007

Q Does the White House think that Congress should have any role in talking about the Iraq war, setting deadlines or anything like this -- that they should have any voice?

MS. PERINO: Well, I think the Congress does have a voice and does have input. And the President has said from the beginning that if they have ideas and they have concerns, that he wants to hear them.

One thing that concerned me today is I heard that Senator Reid said that the President is in denial about the war. And I think that any quick glance in the mirror would show him that he's in denial on several things -- that Senator Reid is.

First of all, he's in denial about the enemy that we face. This is a vicious and brutal enemy that wants to kill innocent men, women and children of Iraq, people who enjoy and love freedom, and that includes Americans. So it's not in our long-term national security interests in order to not deal with this enemy now.

Secondly, he's in denial about the conflict that we are in, how al Qaeda is inciting sectarian violence. He is in denial about the new Baghdad security plan and the new changes that we've implemented in al Anbar province. He's also in denial that a surrender date he thinks is a good idea. It is not a good idea. It is defeat. It is a death sentence for the millions of Iraqis who voted for a constitution, who voted for a government, who voted for a free and democratic society.

     Here's what happens. The U.S. withdraws from Iraq and all hell will break loose. I seriously doubt if millions of Iraqis will die when the various insurgents start killing each other but it will be a very great number. This death rampage is going to happen sooner or later no matter how things go in Iraq. The minute that the United States leaves the country, the blood will spill. Based on other United States involvement in other wars, this has happened every time the Americans have left. This will be no different! The Iraqi groups who have supported the Americans will be the ones to suffer most of the bloodshed, as was the case in Vietnam after we left. There is nothing that the United States can do about it, period. Unless, of course, we stay in Iraq and play daddy to everyone. I do believe that is Bush's plan and has been all along.

 The Democrats in Congress obviously don't have the votes to override the President's veto, and so it is incumbent upon them to work things out, to reconcile the House and the Senate bills, and to send the President a bill. Now if it's one that he can sign, that was what we would prefer. But if it's one that he has to veto, he will do that.

   Bush would prefer a blank check like the ones the past Congress ( Republican ) kept on giving him. It ain't gonna happen this time pal!

   On Alberto Gonzales testimony:

Q One more follow on this. I understand that point you're making about what was proper and improper, but the fact of the matter is, that after the testimony you could call all over this town -- I'm not just talking about the Jon Stewart's of the world, the late night comics -- I'm talking about Republican senators and congressmen and women who were saying, you know what, the Attorney General has no credibility, he did a lousy job on Capitol Hill yesterday. And now the President seems to be the only one saying, you know what, he's doing a fantastic job.

MS. PERINO: Look, I understand that there are people who disagree, who are not supportive of the Attorney General. The President is. He appreciates the work that he's done to combat terrorism and to protect children from predators and to stamp out corruption in government. And the President stands by him.

Q Dana, to follow on that, you just used a phrase that the President did today, "he answered as honestly as he could." Isn't honesty sort of black and white?

MS. PERINO: I think what I mean by that is that I know that there was frustration because there were several types of questions that the Attorney General could not answer with a "yes" or a "no" because he didn't recall. And I think that's what the President meant, and that's what I mean now.

Q There were about 64 variations, according to some accounts in the media, 64 variations of "I don't recall," "I don't remember. So what about that testimony in which he said "I don't recall," some variation, 64 times, that made the President say he now has increased confidence in the Attorney General?

MS. PERINO: Look, Ed, I think that you had testimony that lasted I don't know how many hours, over seven hours, and so many of those questions were repeated over and over. And the Attorney General, who is an honorable and honest man answered truthfully. And I think that's all that we can ask of any public servant or any of us in this room.

Q But did the President actually see the testimony?

MS. PERINO: He got regular updates from us while we were on the road -- we were on the road that day, on the way to Ohio.

Q So how can he say he has increased confidence if he got updates from other people? So he didn't actually see the testimony, himself, because --

MS. PERINO: He got updates from us, and I think he saw some news coverage of it later that day.

  Ms. Perino may need some help with pulling her head out of her ass, any volunteers?

   IMPEACH! INDICT! IMPRISON!

Tags:

A String Of Bombings In Iraq On Monday

   I see that the Bush troop surge is all going well  on this Monday as 48 people were killed and another 93 wounded in various bombing attacks in Iraq.

    An Iraqi  Interior Ministry official said that police and civilians were targeted in two suicide car bombings in Ramadi, just west of Baghdad and that one of the bombing hit a restaurant, killing 25 civilians and wounding another 35.  

Earlier, in a separate attack, a suicide car bomber struck a police checkpoint just outside Ramadi killing four and wounding six civilians and police, a police official said.

Another car bomb rigged with explosives was found close to the checkpoint and was detonated in a controlled explosion by security forces, the official said.

In Baghdad, seven people were killed and 16 were wounded when a suicide bomber detonated an explosive vest inside a restaurant near the Green Zone, Baghdad police said. CNN

   In the same reported it is noted that the United States military has stopped construction of a wall around al-Adamiya, a Sunni neighborhood in northern Baghdad.

   A military statement said that "The construction of the wall is under review. We need to protect the people in Iraq. How that is done is always being discussed and we continue the dialogue. We coordinate with the Iraq government to establish effective appropriate security measures."        Source

    What that would mean is that the Bush boys will put a little pressure on Prime Minister al-Maliki to okay the wall no matter what the Iraqi people want. Occupation of  another country doesn't mean that you listen to the people. You do what you want to do no matter who doesn't like it.

Tags:

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Bush's Job Approval Rating At 33%, His Stupidity Index Rises To All Time High! 1000%

    The American Research Group says that Resident Bush's job approval rating is unchanged from March and it holds steady at a whopping 33%!

62%  disapprove of his job performance. On Bush's handling of the economy: 33% approve    63% disapprove 

  More results can be found HERE.

   The stupidity index is my own creation, and, based on his actions with Iraq, the minimum wage, and global warming, I do expect his percentage to increase very shortly!

Tags:

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Sunday, April 22, 2007

"Tarzan" Actor, Cheeta the Chimp Turns 75

     The LATimes ran a story on a Hollywood legend in his own right on Sunday. That would be Cheeta, the chimp from the old " Tarzan " movies of the 1930's, who just recently turned 75. This is a rarity for a chimp in any kind of environment.

   The article is a made up interview between a reporter and Cheeta. This is a Chimp with a sense of humor.

   I am posting the beginning page, but you will have to click the link to read the rest of the " interview ". Please do so as it is pretty neat.

Cheeta speaks

He's outlived them all. Tarzan. Trigger. Ronald Reagan. Now, retired in Palm Springs, the world's oldest chimp gets some stuff off his chest.

By J.R. Moehringer, J.R. Moehringer is a senior writer for West.
April 22, 2007

 

Tarzan's Cheeta turns 75


What can I say—I'm a star. That's why this guy's staring at me, right? I seem familiar, and not just because I did 50 movies, including those classic "Tarzan" flicks of the 1930s. Maybe he saw me on one of the morning shows. Maybe he read about me in Guinness World Records—oldest living chimpanzee. Or maybe he recognizes me in a way he can't quite put into words?
Whatever, I know why he's here. I just celebrated my 75th birthday, which is a flat-out miracle for a chimp. In the wild we rarely reach 40. In captivity 50 is a feat. So I'm like the Methuselah of Monkeys. The George Burns of Hollywood Apes.
More important, I'm one of the lucky ones. Hollywood chimps generally don't fare well. We're like child stars—more likely to meet with tragedy when fully grown.
It's not our fault. Case in point: Those Hollywood chimps who busted out of a sanctuary near Bakersfield two years ago, then bit off a man's fingers and nose before being shot to death. You have to wonder what made them snap like that.
Everyone assumes that Hollywood animals are treated humanely, 24-7, thanks to that ubiquitous disclaimer: "No animals were hurt in the making of this blah blah." Few people consider what happens to animals after the movie wraps. Believe me, retirement is the next great challenge for animal-rights activists, because if you're a Hollywood animal, retirement can be hell.
Hence the recent parade of visitors to my cage. People want to celebrate the rare success story I represent—a Hollywood chimp who's retired, fat and happy. That famous chimp broad, Jane Goodall? She came by for a look-see last fall. Also, the mayor of Palm Springs, Ronald Oden? There's talk he'll declare my birthday to be Cheeta Day. (Cheeta—that's my stage name. Real name's Jiggs. Don't ask.)
And now here comes this dopey-looking reporter. How do I know he's a reporter? Check out those clothes. And that silly notebook. Look at him peer into my cage, that expectant look on his hairless face, as if I might blurt out a few words. Get a grip, bud, I'm an ape, not a Muppet.
The 62-year-old fellow with the reporter is Dan Westfall, my trainer. Westfall used to be a singer-comedian, back in his salad days. That's why we get along, because we're both retired showmen, living the quiet life in this primate sanctuary Westfall runs out of his house, on this otherwise normal suburban street in Palm Springs. (The neighbors don't seem to mind. "They like it," Westfall says. In 19 years, he insists, he's not had one complaint about noise.) The other reason Westfall and I click is that, as you can see, the man doesn't say much. He's a little like Tarzan—one-word responses, three-word sentences. Between my nonverbal nature and Westfall's sparse answers, I wonder how in the world this reporter is going to write his story.
Besides me there are five other primates in cages behind Westfall's pool, all retired showbiz hands, including Jeeter, my grandson. Jeeter loves the water, even swims in Westfall's pool, whereas I've got more important things to do than perfect my backstroke. I'm a Renaissance chimp. I watch TV. (Cartoons mostly.) I look through books. I play piano. "He's getting ready to do a CD," Westfall says. "You know Buddy Greco? Buddy's producing his CD."
What I really love is painting. I'm good too. Westfall offers my paintings for sale on the Internet—$135 a throw, including shipping and handling—and he does land-office business. The money helps fund his nonprofit sanctuary.
I guess you'd call my stuff abstract. Some of my canvases recall the late Pollock, some are straight-up Kandinsky, with a dash of Brice Marden. I like to say my style is always evolving. I never get tired of that joke.
Westfall's uncle, Tony Gentry, was the trainer who first "discovered" me. Actually, snatched me from the Liberian jungle back in 1932. Imagine: There I was, 6 months old, minding my own beeswax, when suddenly through the underbrush comes this mob of Liberians, led by this Hollywood trainer. I wasn't into wearing diapers yet, but I wish I had been, if you get my drift.
Next thing I know, I'm thousands of miles from home, missing my mother, wearing silly get-ups, taking guff from some sap in a director's chair. I'm not beefing, mind you. How many chimps can say they worked with all the showbiz greats? Maureen O'Sullivan. Rex Harrison. Ronald Reagan.
My breakout role was opposite Johnny Weissmuller, a.k.a. Tarzan. I was the comic relief. I'd stagger around, do something silly, pull a long face—you know, break up the tension. Or else I'd stir things up, cause a little mischief. That shtick won me most of my fans. I still get letters, e-mails, and you wouldn't believe the number of people buzzing on the Internet about my birthday.
But all good things come to an end. I called it a career in 1967, after we wrapped "Doctor Dolittle." I'd had a good run. Longer than most. Typically, when a Hollywood chimp reaches 7 or 8, he's too strong, too aggressive to work in showbiz any longer. He'll live another 30 years, at least, but he can't be controlled, so he's cast aside.
"Cheeta is a very unusual case," says Patti Ragan, founder of the Center for Great Apes in Wauchula, Fla., one of the nation's few chimp sanctuaries. "These animals have ended up in backyard cages, breeder compounds."
And worse. According to a group called the Chimpanzee Collaboratory, the odds were heavy against me landing in this lap of luxury: Chubbs, who starred in that recent remake of "Planet of the Apes"? He now lives in a Texas roadside zoo that's been charged with violating the Endangered Species Act. Lily, star of "Babe 2"? She sits in a dismal cement cage somewhere in Arkansas. The list goes on and on.
It's not just that very few sanctuaries accept retired Hollywood chimps, Ragan says. The ones that do are all at capacity, including hers. That leaves some of us with no place to go.
"We have a 47-year-old male," Ragan says. "He came out of the circus—they retired him at age 15—then kept him alone in a tiny little cage by himself for 25 or 30 years. He never saw another chimp again. When he came here we didn't know if we could ever get him to be with other chimps."
She's pleased to report that this chimp now lives with a group of castrated male circus chimps, reasonably content. Happy ending. Sort of.

   Read the rest HERE!

Tags:   

Nouri al-Maliki Orders A Stop On Building Of Wall

    Nouri al-Maliki ( Iraqi Prime Minister ) said today that he has stopped the construction of a wall being built that would have separated Shiite areas which surround a Sunni area. The Sunni neighborhood would have been walled up with Iraq military troops manning entrance and exit locations into and out of the Sunni enclave.

    al-Maliki said that there are betters ways of dealing with the problems of attacks without walling up a neighborhood.

al-Maliki:  "I oppose the building of the wall and its construction will stop. There are other methods to protect neighborhoods."

He did not elaborate but added "this wall reminds us of other walls," in an apparent reference to the wall that divided the German city of Berlin during the Cold War.  Source

  I wonder how ' the decider ' up in the White House will feel about this.

   It's nice to see al-Maliki make one of his own decisions, but I seriously doubt that Bush and the rest of the crooks will let it stand for to long.

 

Tags:

More Gun Control After Va. Tech Shootings?

More Gun Control After VA. Tech?

So we now have groups calling for more additional gun laws after the one man rampage which occurred at Virginia Tech. This will no doubt die down after awhile, as has in many other cases after school shootings.
Many people have been claiming that the shooting would not have happened at Va. Tech if stricter gun laws had been in place. We all know that is nothing but straight bull!
So do Penn&Teller. Watch this video.


 

 

Tags:

An Resident Of Baghdad See's Things This Way..

    From Daily Kos

Letter from Baghdad

by Amory Blaine   Sat Apr 21, 2007

Mowfak is a Sunni, probably an ex Ba’athist.  He is a gentle man, polite, always smiling.  I have known him for a few years; yesterday, we had a long chat.  He is despairing.  He sees no solution for the disaster that has befallen his country.  He has sent his family to a neighboring Arab country, his big house in an upper middle class neighborhood of Baghdad abandoned.  The whole neighborhood is abandoned. 14 families on the street, 4 Sunni,10 Shia, all left together, driving across the desert in a convoy.  They all still live together, 14 families in one apartment building, on the outskirts of an Arab capital, recreating in exile their prewar neighborhood.

Mowfak’s father, a professor educated at a top western university, built the house back in the 1960s.  It was a neighborhood of academics. No one asked or cared if their neighbors were Sunni or Shia.  The 70s were a golden age in Baghdad.   The country was rich, flush with oil money.  The government invested in roads, education, infrastructure.  The Ba’athist regime, of course, was brutal, dictatorial, crushing of dissent but apolitical Iraqis saw their lives get better.  The future was bright.  The regime was explicitly secular, students received scholarships to study in the west and they happily brought their western knowledge, their western ways back to Iraq to build their country.

The golden age ended with the invasion of Iran. If you ask Iraqis why Saddam went to war, they look at you and tilt their heads.  If you say, "Do you think the Americans wanted Saddam to attack Iran?" they reply "Of course". This belief is not implausible.  America had just been humiliated by the fall of the Shah, the taking of the American embassy, the failed rescue attempt. And America had supported the Ba’ath Party in the 1960s when it competed with the Iraqi Communist Party for power.  We certainly backed Iraq during the war, as did Kuwait, as did Saudi Arabia.

The war was a disaster for Iraq. Not only did millions die but the oil money that had been going to improve the lives of rural and urban Iraqis now was being spent on armaments.  Kuwait had been sending money to support Iraq against the Persian (and Shia) threat but when the war ended, so did the subsidy.  Oil prices had fallen, Kuwait was drilling oil that Iraq thought was theirs. Iraq asked for $2 billion. Kuwait refused.  It is under this background that Saddam made his next great mistake.

He went to the American Ambassador April Gillespie and explained his objections to Kuwaiti policy.  She famously replied that the United States took no position on inter-Arab border disputes.  Saddam took that as a green light to invade.

And so the 90s were worse than the 80s for Iraq.  Sanctions starved the middle class, cut them off from the West that many of them identified with, that they saw as part of their cultural heritage.  The Ba’athist elite, of course, did not suffer as much.  By isolating the country, sanctions actually increased their power within Iraq.

In the days before the American invasion, many Iraqis thought it would improve their lives.  Few supported the regime; most were happy to see it fall.  A General told me, "Why do you think the invasion was so fast?  We did not fight.  We parked our tanks and pointed the turrets into the ground."  In Mansour, a neighborhood now under insurgent control, the American soldiers were indeed greeted with flowers.

Our mistakes are well known.  Let us list some of them anyway:

  1. Disbanding the army, leaving armed men with no way of making a living.
  1. Deba’athication, forcing the educated elite who would have happily administered the country for us out of their jobs.
  1. Not providing security during the anarchic days after the fall of Baghdad.
  1. Imposing a neo-liberal free trade regime on a country that had been isolated from the world economy, causing an upsurge of food and manufacturing imports from China and Iran thus devastating domestic industry and agriculture, dramatically raising unemployment.

Who has won? The fundamentalists, both Sunni and Shia.  Who has lost? The Westernized secular educated middle class, people like Mowfak, who had hoped we would bring prosperity to their country. The exile of the best and the brightest Iraqis will cost their country for a long time. I asked Mowfak if his friends would come back, if order were restored, if there were peace.  He said, "No, they will not return." He said  "What peace? There will be war here for a generation." He said, "When the Americans leave, then you will see a slaughter."

Mowfak is bitter.  He said the worst thing the American have done, the very worst thing, is that they have turned people like him, the educated elite, people who drank whiskey and read Shakespeare into fundamentalists.

Every time I come to Iraq, it is worse than the time before.  In all likelihood, it will continue to get worse.  Iraqis now fear that when the Americans leave, the Turks, the Saudis, and the Iranians will invade.

   Tags:

 

Ads by AdGenta.com

Saturday, April 21, 2007

Bribes And Profit Student Loan Lenders

   With the college student loan scandal ever widening, it is time that we take a look at some of the players in this crime spree. Yes sir! More of the Bush Crime Family ethics tour.

    Robert Kuttner does this for us at CommonDreams.

 

Published on Saturday, April 21, 2007 by

Privatizing and Profiteering

by Robert Kuttner

The Deepening college loan scandal is a classic case of what can happen when government uses private companies as middlemen to carry out public goals. Lately, investigations by New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, US Senator Edward Kennedy, and others have revealed a number of problems:

  • Bribes paid by loan companies to colleges and universities. For example, Drexel University in Philadelphia was promised $250,000 in exchange for designating Education Finance Partners as its sole “preferred lender.” Since 2005, according to Cuomo’s office, Drexel has steered more than $16 million in loans to the company, costing students more than available alternatives.
  • Personal conflicts of interests by some college student aid officials. At Columbia University, an associate dean owned substantial stock in a “preferred lender.” At Johns Hopkins, a financial aid officer got consulting fees and had her graduate school tuition paid by Student Loan Xpress, one of the worst offenders.
  • Self-dealing by US Department of Education officials. Matteo Fontana, a senior department official held at least $100,000 in stock of one loan company he was overseeing. Several other Bush officials in charge of student aid come from the industry.
  • Exorbitant profiteering in this industry, which is subsidized by taxpayers. The biggest private student loan company, Sallie Mae, is being sold for $25 billion. Its former chairman, Albert L. Lord, got $228 million in salary and stock options in 2005, according to The New York Times.In response, Cuomo is promoting a code of conduct, and Kennedy has proposed legislation that would prohibit bribes, conflicts of interest, and kindred abuses. But, as Kennedy points out, the problems go much deeper.The private student loan industry exists side-by-side with a more efficient and corruption-free direct loan program run by the federal government. This program, whose origins date back to 1958, passes along the government’s own low borrowing rate. Congress added the subsidized private loan program as an alternative in 1965.

    The oddity of having two programs side by side has been repeatedly criticized by the Government Accountability Office. The proliferation of private student loan programs adds complexity as well as cost. Filling out student loan applications is literally more complex than doing your taxes — in this case the complexity is brought to you by the private sector.

    The private lending industry adds nothing of value and takes no real risk, since loan repayment is guaranteed by the government. It simply skims off exorbitant profit at taxpayer expense — and then adds further costs of marketing and bribing college officials. According to government figures tabulated by US News & World Report, the direct loan program does better than break even, while the private loan program costs taxpayers $12.80 for every $100 borrowed. Most of those extra costs go for company profits. If all reduced-rate loans had been made through the direct loan program, Kennedy reports, we would have saved $30 billion since 1994, the year Congress revised and expanded the federal program.

    Over time, the private student lending industry has become a major lobbying force, using political connections and campaign contributions to hobble its more efficient direct government competitor and block limits on its own profits. The industry succeeded in rigging the rules so that the more efficient public program is losing market share. One provision rammed through the Republican Congress prohibits the public program from marketing itself. Another kept Congress from reducing the maximum interest rates private lenders could charge.

    In the 2004 and 2006 election cycles, Sallie Mae donated at least $877,000 to the election campaigns of President Bush and Republican candidates; $122,470 went to the PAC of Representative John Boehner , then head of the House education committee, according to the group Campaign for America’s Future. To add insult to industry, the Republican Congress and the Bush administration have cut funding for Pell grants, so that students and parents are more reliant on the tender mercies of private lenders.

    The private student loan industry adds nothing of value. The policy of subsidizing private lenders to serve public purposes (and to corrupt our colleges and universities) should be scrapped in favor of the direct federal loan program.

    If this saga sounds familiar, it exactly parallels the privatized Medicare drug program and the efforts by the insurance industry to turn the rest of Medicare into a taxpayer subsidy for private industry. Though three decades of government-bashing have left many politicians reluctant to draw the obvious conclusion, it is often more efficient and less corrupting for government to do the public’s business directly.


    Robert Kuttner is co-editor of The American Prospect and a senior fellow at Demos. His column appears regularly in the Globe.

    © Copyright

    2007

    2007 The Boston Globe                                                                           Tags:  

  • Paul Wolfowitz, The Pentagon, and His Whore

      Paul Wolfowitz has been a very busy, corrupt Bush loyalist way before the World Bank story came out, especially for his little whore, Shaha Ali Riza.

    Sidney Blumenthal has come up with some juicy details on the dealings ( illegal ) of Mr. Wolfowitz, which you may find interesting.

    Back in 2003, Wolfowitz had taken care of Riza by directing his trusted Pentagon deputy, Undersecretary of Defense Douglas Feith -- who had been in charge of the Office of Special Plans and had been Wolfowitz's partner in managing the CPA -- to arrange for a military contract for her from Science Applications International Corp. When the contract was exposed this week, SAIC issued a statement that it "had no role in the selection of the personnel." In other words, the firm with hundreds of millions in contracts at stake had been ordered to hire Riza.   

    Riza, who is not a U.S. citizen, had to receive a security clearance in order to work at the State Department. Who intervened? It is not unusual to have British or French midlevel officers at the department on exchange programs, but they receive security clearances based on the clearances they already have with their host governments. Granting a foreign national who is detailed from an international organization a security clearance, however, is extraordinary, even unprecedented. So how could this clearance have been granted?      Full Article from Salon

       One corrupt person trying to police corruption somewhere else is the same as one person policing pedophiles while being one himself. It don't work.

     

    Tags:

     

    Ads by AdGenta.com

    Friday, April 20, 2007

    While the Republicans Say The Democrats Are Turning Their Backs On the Troops...

       Ever since Harry Reid came out and said that the war in Iraq is " lost ", we've heard nothing from the Republicans except how Reid's comments have hurt the troops with his comments  .

    Senate GOP leader Mitch McConnell said,  " I can't begin to imagine how our troops in the field, who are risking their lives every day, are going to react when they get back to base and hear that the Democrat leader of the United States Senate has declared the war is lost.''

         Whenever the troops heard the comments from Reid, I'd bet that most said that they already know the war is a lost, so now get us out of here!

        If you wish to hear what many of the military veteran's and families have to say about this mess in Iraq, then go to here to Video Vets Project and have a listen. While you are at it, why don't you send a link or copy to the White House?

       Here is a sample of what a few had to say.

    California Gold Star Mom:

    I used to lay in bed at about 11 o'clock at night an imagine somebody would be knocking on my door. And I would visualize how I would respond to that, and lay in bed, "Go away, don't come here for that." And so every minute you just expected to get the knock at the door - I just worried so much that somebody would come to my house and ultimately that's what happened.  I wrote this letter to Ken on the one year anniversary of his death..."I'm so proud that you chose to serve your country.  And in the same thought I am so unbearably offended that this Administration used your good will, your patriotism, and your values to send you to fight their illegal, immoral, war of choice."

     

    Pennsylvania Iraq Veteran:

    It never seemed to me that we were fighting Al Quaeda, Bin Laden, or the people who were responsible for attacking us on 9/11.  The mission was so confusing, and it seemed as if everybody in the community disliked us. To keep American soldiers in Iraq for an indefinite period of time being attacked by an unidentifiable enemy is wrong, immoral, and irresponsible...I feel used and I feel misled by the Administration. I feel that my patriotism has been used and exploited, my willingness to fight for this country has been used and exploited. I'm very proud of my military service, but I'm very disappointed in the civilian leadership and the Administration for sending us needlessly into combat.

    Indiana Iraq Veteran:

    When I was deployed to Iraq, we lacked crucial and necessary equipment and supplies...When I was in Iraq, I drove a pickup truck that you could buy off the lot anywhere at any Chevrolet dealership, and that was our means of transportation - that was the vehicle that we ought out of. We modified our pick-up truck to try to become a war fighting machine. We put a stand in the back of it so we could mount a machine gun in the back of the truck...It's important to end this war...we have our young men and women caught up in a religious and civil war, and we're doing more harm than good."

          August 21,2006

    WASHINGTON - August 21 - Calling President Bush’s “hard line” policies on Iraq and Iran failures that have undermined national security and made America less safe, General Joseph Hoar (USMC ret.), Lt. General Robert Gard (USA ret.), and Morton Halperin, former National Security Council staff, released an open letter signed by twenty-one colleagues urging the Administration to reverse course

     

    Think Progress

    Former U.S. Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, who helped engineer the U.S. withdrawal from Vietnam, said Sunday the problems in Iraq are more complex than that conflict, and military victory is no longer possible. […]

    Reid’s remarks also echo senior military officials. Retired Gen. Wiliam Odom, head of Army intelligence and director of the National Security Agency under Ronald Reagan, published an essay in February titled “Victory Is Not An Option.” Also, via TPM Cafe, here’s Gen. Tony McPeak, who served on the Joint Chiefs of Staff during the first Gulf War:

    The war in Iraq isn’t over yet, but — surge or no surge — the United States has already lost. That’s the grim consensus of a panel of experts assembled by Rolling Stone to assess the future of Iraq. “Even if we had a million men to go in, it’s too late now,” says retired four-star Gen. Tony McPeak, who served on the Joint Chiefs of Staff during the Gulf War. “Humpty Dumpty can’t be put back together again.

     

    Senator Carl Levin (D-MI): Mr. Gates, do you believe that we are currently winning in Iraq?
    Secretary of Defense Robert Gates: No, sir.
    (Armed Services Committee Hearing, 12/4/07)

    Editorial: President Has Lost the War and His Honor. "The president might win this battle, but he already has lost the war in Iraq -- and the one for his honor." [Editorial, Santa Fe New Mexican, 3/24/07]

    Reagan NSA Director See Similarities to Vietnam in Iraq Conflict. General William Odom, who served as President Reagan's head of the National Security Agency, said the Iraqi insurgency parallels Vietnam. "I see a lot of similarities to Vietnam. It seems to me the persons who have the greatest interest in the U.S. being in Iraq are Osama bin Laden, Iranians and other radical movements in the Middle East. We made Iraq now safe for those kinds of movements and they're breeding them rapidly." [NPR "Morning Edition," 4/15/04]

           Any questions?

     

    Tags:  

     

    Ads by AdGenta.com

    House Democratic Leaders Send Letter To Bush

       Here is the text of a letter that House Democratic Leaders sent to Resident Bush today to give him the facts about the Iraq war funding of the United States troops.

     

    April 20, 2007

    The President
    The White House
    Washington, D.C. 20500

    Dear Mr. President:

    As you know, Congress is working to produce a supplemental appropriations bill that will provide for our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. Disclosures this week by officials in the Department of Defense contradict repeated claims made by officials in your Administration in an effort to influence the outcome of congressional deliberations and public opinion. We therefore wanted to make sure you were aware of the facts on two critical issues relating to the supplemental.

    First, on the value of timelines for redeployment of our troops from Iraq, Secretary of Defense Gates said this week: “The debate in Congress…has been helpful in demonstrating to the Iraqis that American patience is limited…the strong feelings expressed in the Congress about the timetable probably has had a positive impact… in terms of communicating to the Iraqis that this is not an open-ended commitment.”

    Given the consideration that Secretary Gates has to give on a daily basis on how best to advance U.S. policy interests in Iraq, his views on the value of debating timetables for redeployment should be given great weight. Unlike some in your Administration who have been playing politics by criticizing the debate in Congress over responsible timelines, Secretary Gates recognizes that debating the timelines is constructive because it exerts pressure on Iraq’s leaders to forge political compromises.

    Second, despite claims by some in your Administration that our troops in Iraq would be harmed if additional funding is not provided quickly, the Comptroller of the Army has made clear this week that money currently available to the Department of Defense can pay for the war until the end of June. Although it is the intention of Congress to send you an appropriations measure next week, should you follow through on your threat not to sign it, it is clear that there is ample time to work together to devise an alternative.

    Congressional leaders are willing to work cooperatively with you on all matters relating to the war in Iraq. The bill we will send you provides for our veterans, protects our troops, rebuilds our military, holds the Iraqi government accountable, and responsibly winds down this war.

    To work cooperatively, all parties must acknowledge what the facts are. We hope that you will take this letter in the spirit of clarifying the facts on these two vital matters.

    Thank you for your consideration of our views.

    Sincerely,

    Nancy Pelosi
    Speaker of the House

    Steny H. Hoyer
    Majority Leader

    James E. Clyburn
    Majority Whip

    Rahm Emanuel
    Caucus Chairman

    John B. Larson
    Caucus Vice Chairman

    Xavier Becerra
    Assistant to the Speaker

          I'm hoping that Bush will get someone to read this letter to him. the reader may have to slap him around to keep his short attention span.

    Tags:  

     

    Ads by AdGenta.com

    Rep. Rick Renzi (R-Ariz.) Stepping down From His Seat On House Intelligence Committee

       Things just keep getting better for some House Republicans as this week goes by.

     

    Roll Call:  ( subscription-only )

    In a second blow to House Republicans this week, the FBI raided a business tied to the family of Rep. Rick Renzi (R-Ariz.) Thursday afternoon as part of an ongoing investigation into the three-term lawmaker.

    Details of the raid on Patriot Insurance Agency in Sonoita, Ariz., were not immediately available. Renzi’s most recent financial disclosure form lists the business as an asset belonging to his wife, Roberta, and valued at $1 million to $5 million.

    Little is known about the inquiries into Renzi’s activities, but according to media reports the Justice Department has been running a two-track investigation into Renzi regarding a land deal, as well as a piece of legislation he helped steer that may have improperly benefited a major campaign contributor. It was not immediately clear which investigation the raid pertained to, and neither his attorney nor his spokesman could be immediately reached for comment.

    As a result of the raid, Renzi is stepping down from his seat on the House Intelligence Committee, according to a statement from his office obtained Thursday evening by Roll Call.

          He can now keep Rep. Doolittle company for a while.

    Tags:

     

    Ads by AdGenta.com

    Iraq Accountability Act Heads To Conference

        You have to keep an eye on those sneaky little Republicans at all times, it seems.

    Republicans, led by Rep. Jerry Lewis, attempted to strip provisions in the Iraq Accountability Act holding the Iraqi government accountable and providing for a responsible redeployment from Iraq before it goes to conference committee for reconciliation with the Senate version of the emergency supplemental.    The Gavel

    Appropriations Chairman David Obey had a little to say about this attempt by the GOP.

       David Obey: " Let me put it another way. When the bill was before us the first time, our Republican friends did not bother to offer a recommital motion. Why? Because they were divided about how to proceed. They could reach no agreement. They had no policy. Now they are offering a motion which they say they’re going to vote against. Is that the best they can do? We’ve heard talk about a surrender date. The only surrender that’s involved here today is the surrender of the obligation of this Congress to oversee presidential and executive branch policy. The only surrender is the total surrender of our obligation and our authority to a White House that has demonstrated from day one that it had not a clue of what it was getting into and today has not a clue about how to get out. We have to provide better leadership than that. That’s what this bill tries to do."

       You can watch Chairman Obey speak Here.

      Here is a list of the Democrats who will be serving as conferees:

     

    Rep. Obey
    Rep. Murtha
    Rep. Clyburn
    Rep. Wasserman Schultz
    Rep. DeLauro
    Rep. Lowey
    Rep. Olver
    Rep. Serrano
    Rep. Visclosky
    Rep. Price (NC)
    Rep. Dicks
    Rep. Edwards
    Rep. Mollohan

      The New Elliott Ness gang!

    Tags:

    Thursday, April 19, 2007

    A Letter From Anonymous Justice Department Employees To The Investigating committees

        The House and Senate Judiciary Committees got a letter  from some anonymous Justice Department employees concerning politics at the department.

          You can go here for the full letter in PDF. Meantime, here are a few excerpts.

    Dear Messrs. Chairman,

    Many of us in the Department of Justice have been watching with admiration as you expose the overly political firing of United States Attorneys and hope that you can help in returning our beloved Department to of establishing justice in the United States. We are equally concerned, however, about the politicizing of the non-political ranks of Justice employees, offices which are consistently and methodically being eroded by partisan politics.

    Many employees within the Department’s litigating divisions are sitting quietly by, hoping that you will investigate what has happened to the Attorney General’s Honors Program and even the Summer Law Intern Program (SLIP). You are surely aware that the Attorney General’s Honors Program has a long history of hiring top students from a variety of law schools, and it is the only way that young lawyers are able to come into the Department immediately after law school. This year the divisions once again pored over applications and resumes, choosing students to interview who demonstrated not only excellent grades but a real interest in the areas of law they might be hired to work in. After choosing potential candidates to interview, the division personnel forwarded their lists to the Office of Attorney Recruitment Management for what was traditionally final approval. This is no longer a final step, however, because the list had to go higher - to the Office of the Deputy Attorney General. When the list of potential interviewees was returned this year, it had been cut dramatically.

    ...When division personnel staff later compared the remaining interviewees with the candidates struck form the list, one common denominator appeared repeatedly: most of those struck form the list had interned for a Hill Democrat, clerked for a Democratic judge, worked for a “liberal” cause, or otherwise appeared to have “liberal” leanings. Summa cum laude graduates of both Yale and Harvard were rejected for interviews....

    ...While the current political appointees repeatedly remind everyone that the U.S. Attorneys “serve at the pleasure of the President,” the Department’s career attorneys serve the people of the United States. We hope you will see fit to include this politicizing of the career ranks in your questioning of Attorney General Gonzales and his staff.

    Thank you.

    A Group of Concerned Department of Justice Employees

    Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, Jr. in response to the letter, had this to say.

    “I take any accusations of undue politicization of career staff seriously. We have already identified concerns in Department’s Civil Rights Division. These new accusations are clearly something we will want to consider as well.”

    Source

       Bear in mind the letter was delivered yesterday. Gonzo hit the stand to testify today. He should just save the taxpayers what little money we have left and resign.

     

    Tags:

    Bush To Veto District of Columbia Bill?

           In legislation which was passed by the House ( 241-177 ), Washington, D.C. gets one step closer to having voting rights. But as is usual, the White House says that the bill will be veto' d because it is unconstitutional according the the Hoods on the Hill. This is one time though, that they may be right, unfortunately.

       My biggest gripe with this is why is the White House so concerned with the constitutionality of a bill since they generally pay no attention to the Constitution on the majority of matters when it comes to law and rights?

       It is just an outdated piece of paper so far as they are concerned which they have strived to replace with the GOP declaration of dictatorship.

    The bill would permanently increase full House membership to 437, giving the largely Democratic half-million residents of the district a seat and adding a temporary at-large seat for Republican-leaning Utah. The House has consisted of 435 seats since 1960.     Yahoo News

       I would say that it is that largely Democratic party of residents which concerns the Republican establishment the most.

       If the Constitution is correct in forbidding this, then this needs to be changed.

     

    Tags:

    Rep. Doolittle Resigns His Seat

      It seems that Dr. Doolittle ( Rep. John Doolittle, R-Calif. ) has resigned from his House Appropriations Committee seat. The embarrassment of the F.B.I. raiding his home was probably the reason for Doolittle's  trip out the door.

        Here is a bit more from Roll Call

    While Doolittle is expected to voluntarily take himself off the panel while the investigation continues, knowledgeable House sources said that Minority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) and members of the Republican Steering Committee -- which determines committee assignments -- were prepared to remove him from his post if he would not do so himself.

       This makes it a lovely day in the neighborhood for some of us who disdain this administration. Hopefully when it is all over, Doolittle will be visiting the Federal Detention vacation center in an orange jumpsuit.

       Tags:

     

    Ads by AdGenta.com

    Baghdad Has Another Booming Day

       So Thursday was another booming day in Baghdad as close to 200 people were killed in the capital. 140 people were killed in the Sadriya district at a food market by a car bomb.

       No need to point out that this was the worst day of violence since the U.S. crackdown began. 

      PM Nouri Maliki: "This monstrous attack today did not distinguish between the old and young, between men and women. It targeted the population in a way that reminds us of the massacres and genocide committed by the former dictatorship."        BBC

       But  things are looking promising. Right.

    Tags:

     

    Ads by AdGenta.com

    Alberto In The Hot Seat Today

       Today is the day that Alberto Gonzales goes before the Senate Judiciary Committee to lie to it about the firings of 8 prosecutors, which we all know was carried out for political reasons.

       Since Gonzales hasn't been truthful about the firings ever since this story broke, he most certainly cannot afford to start this late in the game. He only has one other option and that would be to plead the 5th Amendment so that he doesn't incriminate himself.

        Senate Judiciary Committee has Alberto scheduled to testify all day today under oath.

       Although many Republicans have called for Gonzales to resign, along with many Democrats, there remain a few who support him.

      Sen. Orrin Hatch: "The sooner it's over, the better. If he just answers the questions, he'll be fine." 

       Rep. Chris Cannon: "I hope he doesn't apologize. He is in a really miserable position where people are focused and saying nasty things. He thinks that he acted appropriately. I told him he ought to be less gracious in his responses."

    Associated Press

    Critics allege that some of the eight fired were dismissed to interfere with ongoing corruption investigations in ways that might help Republicans. Gonzales strongly denies that, but Democrats have maintained that a stiff denial is insufficient without more details.

    Some Republicans acknowledge that merely sticking to the talking points in Gonzales' prepared testimony will make it hard for him to hang onto his job. The committee's senior Republican, Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, dismissed the prepared remarks as "pablum."    

          If the Senate Judiciary Committee does their job right today, Alberto Gonzales will be leaving in tears when the day is over. I'd rather it be handcuffs but we still have time for that later on.

    Tags:  

    Wednesday, April 18, 2007

    Bush Taken Aback By Reid/Pelosi Comments To Him

       I wish that I could have been a fly on the wall during the Bush and Reid/Pelosi discussion over the war funding!

      From TPM we have this tidbit.

          By Greg Sargent

    First, the source says, Bush bristled and was taken aback when Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid compared the current situation to Vietnam; he also appeared irked by those who said the war couldn't be won.

    Second, according to the source, Reid told Bush that he understood that the White House would come after Congressional Dems after the veto of the bill with everything they had; Reid vowed to respond every bit as aggressively.

    "Reid talked about a recent conversation he had with a retired general where they talked about the similarities between the current situation and Vietnam," the source relates. "He talked about how the President and Secretary of Defense [during Vietnam] knew that the war was lost but continued to press on at the cost of thousands of additional lives lost."

    "The analogy to Vietnam appeared to touch a nerve with the President. He appeared a little sensitive to it," the source continued. "And he clearly didn't like to hear people in the room say that the war couldn't be won militarily."

    More: "Reid made it clear to the President that he understood that the President and Vice President after the veto would come after him and Speaker Pelosi with everything they have. Reid said that he and Pelosi would respond just as aggressively. He said he was convinced that they were on the right side of the issue."

         You may want to go this article and read the third comment which was left by a TPM reader.

    Tags:

    Rep. John Doolittle Home Raided By F.B.I.

        Another Republican ( Rep. John Doolittle ) got caught in the crosshairs of the F.B.I. and his home was raided.  It is about time for this crook to make reservations for a prison cell!

    FBI Raids Doolittle's Home: The FBI has raided the Northern Virginia home of Rep. John Doolittle (R-Calif.), according to Congressional sources. No details are publicly available yet about the circumstances of the raid, but Doolittle and his wife, Julie, have been under federal investigation for their ties to the scandal surrounding imprisoned former lobbyist Jack Abramoff.     Roll Call

    Tags:

    Russ Feingold Sets CNN John Roberts Straight

    Russ Feingold writes to John Roberts, co-anchor of CNN's "American Morning," after he made some false statements about the Feingold-Reid Iraq redeployment bill.

      I write to express my concern about your comments during CNN's Late Edition on April 15th. During the broadcast, you falsely implied that the Feingold-Reid Iraq redeployment bill would "cut off the funds in the middle of a war" for "troops in the field." While I certainly respect differences of opinion in the debate about the war, I strongly object to this mischaracterization of our effort. Our legislation forces the safe redeployment of troops by March 31, 2008, by prohibiting funds for continued military operations after that date, with a few narrow exceptions. Troops in the field would continue to get their salaries, food, ammunition, weapons, and other supplies as they currently do. You went on to suggest that such an approach has "never happened before." In fact, this is precisely the step Congress took in 1993 to end military operations in Somalia.  

    PDF of the entire letter

    Tags:

     

    Ads by AdGenta.com

    Does Fox News Consider It's Viewers Stupid?

       I am beginning to believe that Fox News has some really ignorant and/ or stupid viewers! I just walked into the house and on the TV screen is the usual Fox News ticker running along the bottom of the screen with  " Breaking News " that Alberto Gonzales is going to testify about the attorney purge scandal.

       We have all know this was going to happen for some time now so my question is, are Fox viewers so forgetful about events that the news channel has to remind them about things that will be going on, or does Fox News consider their viewers stupid? On top of that, this is not breaking news!

    Tags:

     

    Ads by AdGenta.com

    Bush Escalation " Surges " Onward

    BAGHDAD - Four large bombs exploded across Baghdad on Wednesday, killing at least 127 people and wounding scores as violence climbed toward levels seen before the U.S.-Iraqi campaign to pacify the capital began two months ago. AP

       A car bomb parked at a market in Sadriyah killed 82 and wounded 94.

        Another car bomber hit an Iraqi police checkpoint at one of the entrances to Sadr City, killing 30 and wounding 45.

    Earlier, a parked car exploded near a private hospital in the central neighborhood of Karradah, killing 11 people and wounding 13, police said. The blast damaged the Abdul-Majid hospital and other nearby buildings.

    The fourth explosion was from a bomb left on a minibus in the northwestern Risafi area, killing four people and wounding six others, police said.

    Also in Baghdad, four policemen were killed Wednesday afternoon when gunmen ambushed their patrol south of the city center, police said. Six pedestrians were wounded in the gunfire.

         West of Baghdad, five insurgents were killed by U.S. troops and another 30 captured in an Anbar province raid.

       Tags:   

     

    Ads by AdGenta.com

    White House Attempting Obstruction of Justice

       There is no other way to say it. Bush and company are attempting to control the flow of evidence ( emails ) that the House Judiciary Committee is asking for concerning the attorney purge ( illegal firings ).

        The White House sent a letter to the RNC telling them that they must pass all materials to the White house for clearance before going to the committee. "Clearance"  should be called exactly what the White house would be doing and that would be changing and/or deleting more criminal evidence against themselves. Karl Rove in particular.

        Read the letter HERE at TPM

      

    Tags:

    Tuesday, April 17, 2007

    Karl Rove and His Email Deletion

    On my many adventures throughout the universe ( Internet ) I run across a lot of stuff, especially when it comes to videos.

      Have I got one for you! We have footage of Karl Rove deleting some his hard-core emails!




     

     

    Tags:

    Are the Dem's Plans For Iraq That Much Different Than Bush's?

      I ran across this article from the Turkish Daily News while I was browsing around this evening.

       The writer takes a look at what the Democrats have/are actually doing about the war in Iraq and it doesn't look so spiffy, to say the least.

         The Arab's are not to happy with the Democrats at this point as they were expecting a little bit more from the Dems than what they have delivered thus far.

    Democrats were perceived by Arabs as promising to offer an alternative to Bush strategy in Iraq, but so far have merely proved themselves responsive to their voters' anti-war sentiments while the killing goes on, and in some ways gets worse, and the Democrats' supplemental budget bill provides funding to continue the war, while setting a controversial date to end it, and there is disagreement on its strategic effect. They could neither raise the “mission accomplished” banner nor could promise to do so in the near future, not even after Bush's constitutional mandate expires. 

    Would the Democrats' alternative end the occupation? Nothing is concrete and on record so far to indicate it would. Would it end the civil war? On the contrary it will make it worse as all statements by Democrat leaders point only to a “military redeployment” to extricate their troops out of the harm's way. Moreover, is this so-called alternative essentially different from the Republicans' strategy? On the unity of Iraq, oil, long-term US military presence, civil war and the “benchmarks” set for the new Iraqi rulers both alternatives are essentially the same. Their looming showdown over deadlines for combat operations in Iraq would neither set a deadline for the end of Bush era in Iraq nor herald an end to the US era in the country.

    It is almost certain Bush is going to keep his combat troops in Iraq for as long as he wants, until the deadline set by the US constitution for his exit on January 20, 2009.Only then the Bush era will end in Iraq to make room for carrying on the US era in the country either by a new Republican or Democrat administration, which will depend on the outcome of playing politics with more Iraqi blood.Arab observers could not miss facts like that the Democrat-approved $124 billion supplemental funding was more than Bush himself requested; Democrats only require Bush to seek Congressional approval before extending the occupation and spending new funds to do so. All these factors and more boil down to simply empowering Bush to continue his bloody war for at least one more year, until the eve of the next election.         Entire Article

         The sad thing after reading this piece was that I really could not come up with a counter point to it.

    Tags:

    Will Bush Support U.S. Troops Or Will He Veto Them?

    Appropriations Chairmen on Iraq

    April 17th, 2007 by Jesse Lee

    An op-ed today by the respective chairmen of the House and Senate Appropriations committees closes with the following:

    Bush’s choice on funding the troops
    House Appropriations Chairman Dave Obey and Senate Appropriations Chairman Robert Byrd
    Christian Science Monitor - April 17, 2007

    Last week, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates announced that our troops in Iraq and those troops set to deploy will have their tours extended to 15 months. This comes on top of the White House’s announcement that they were rushing thousands of troops back to Iraq for extended tours of duty, without providing sufficient time for rest, recovery, and retraining.

    Such plans, political posturing, and veto threats have placed the safety of our troops in unnecessary jeopardy. It is simply unconscionable that the White House is now attempting to blame Congress for the failure to successfully prosecute the war.

    The president has said on many occasions that the US commitment to Iraq is not open-ended. Now is the time for him to show the nation that those were not hollow words.

    The president has also declared his commitment to improve the lives of our veterans. If the president chooses to work with Congress – the people’s representatives – we can reach a bipartisan solution that unites the country rather than divides it, while meeting the expectations and needs of the American people.       Original Article

    Tags:

     

    Ads by AdGenta.com

    Some Real Truth About The War In Iraq

      Former Reagan Pentagon official Lawrence Korb spent ten days in Iraq and he says that the Bush version of improvement in Iraq is basically bull.

       Korb also happens to be a Center for American Progress senior fellow.

       Korb says what we already know, and that is that the surge isn't working.

    Getting through Iraqi customs was a chore—it was like Moscow in the early 1990s. There were four lines: three for Iraqis and one for “others”. Like the majority of the passengers we went through the “others” line. It took at least an hour for me and my colleague to get through. The Blackwater and Halliburton people, however, went right around the line. One of the other less fortunate contractors remarked that it was not surprising since they are running the country.

    The long wait did allow me to speak to some of the contractors about the situation on the ground. When I assured them I was not a member of the press, they were unanimous that the surge was not working. One of them said that members of Muqtada Al-Sadr’s militia have sold their guns and melted back into the population in Sadr City and will buy back their guns at the appropriate time (our own security guard said something similar).

    ....I had an interesting discussion with an Iraqi official who is close to Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. He made several intriguing observations. First, in their video conferences, Maliki and Bush do not really communicate. The official also noted that in his discussions with visiting members of Congress there is really not much dialogue, with both sides giving canned presentations. Second, the U.S. military and State Department do not really work well together and General George Casey would complain to Iraqis about the former U.S. Ambassador to iraq, Zalmay Khalilzad. Third, the insurgency got started when the Americans failed to take control after the overthrow and the Iraqis realized that the American military was not invincible—that is, its soldiers were human beings who displayed the full range of emotions, including fear. Fourth, do not believe anyone who tells you that the situation is getting better.

          So what about the reports from the White House ( Bush/Cheney ) which say that they are seeing improvement?

    But if one uses the reports of the Special Inspector General for Iraq Reconstruction and pushes the briefers, a different picture emerges. The place is a mess and despite the almost heroic efforts of some Americans and some Iraqis it is not getting better. One of the consultants told me not to believe anyone who says that the situation is getting better.

    While waiting to leave the Green Zone after our IRMO meeting, we visited the military exchange, or PX, and the “pharmacy” (liquor store—the Iraqis call it the Christian pharmacy). I was surprised and saddened that the servicemen and women pay the same prices for goods in Iraq as they do in the states.

    The other thing that struck me was the lack of American soldiers patrolling the neighborhoods. In fact, in my whole time here I did not see one American soldier outside the Green Zone.   

    On the back of this visit, I am more and more convinced that we must take control of our own destiny by setting a specific timetable for withdrawal. Currently, our fate is in the hands of an Iraqi government that does not have any real incentive to get its act together and does not even seem to understand the gravity of the situation or the declining level of support in the United States.

    While I did not see as many soldiers as on my last visit, the ones I spoke to were clearly dispirited about the repeated deployments and the three-month extension.  Full Article

          If this is an accurate account, I would say that Bush, Cheney and the rest of the right-wing hawks have some explaining to do to the American public and to the Congress.

    Tags:  

    Senator Byrd Slaps Down The White House

       Senator Robert Byrd posted a message to the White House on Iraq over at the Huffington Post yesterday.

    The American people have sent a clear message to Washington: it is time to start bringing our troops home from Iraq. Unfortunately, President Bush isn't listening. That's why the Congress has responded, crafting a new direction that will provide the Iraqi government with the necessary motivation to pursue real political reconciliation. The House and the Senate bills take different paths toward this goal, but each recognizes that the American people do not support an open-ended U.S. military occupation in Iraq.

    In the days since the Senate approved its version of the supplemental, the White House has taken on the regular practice of demonizing the Congress and attacking the bipartisan bill. Once again, President Bush took to the bully pulpit today and repeated his hollow claims that the provisions in this legislation would somehow undercut our troops. This is nonsense. The nonpartisan Congressional Research Service has determined that our military has $52 billion to cover expenses through the end of May.

    The President also asserted that Congress is holding funding for the troops hostage for what he has called "pork barrel" spending. More nonsense. Facts matter and once again the President is out of touch with the facts. This is legislation that meets some of the most critical needs of our troops and our nation.

    It is time for the White House to drop this trumped-up crisis talk and get down to the truth.

       Yes indeed!

     

    Tags:

    Republicans/Bush Sink Lower In Latest Polls

      Here we go with the latest poll numbers on Bush and Iraq. This poll was done by the  Washington Post-ABC News from April 12-15, 2007 by telephone.

     

    20. Do you think (the United States must win the war in Iraq in order for the broader war on terrorism to be a success), or do you think (the war on terrorism can be a success without the United States winning the war in Iraq?)

    US must win war in Iraq for success: 37%.
    Can be a success without US winning war in Iraq: 57%.

       This is in comparison to the same questions asked back in January

    US must win war in Iraq for success: 45%. Can be a success without US winning war in Iraq: 47%.

       So it would seem that the Bush/White House propaganda is not working on the citizens of the united States as well as it use to.

    2. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Bush is handling (ITEM)?

                     Approve  29%               Disapprove  70%

    7. Do you approve or disapprove of the way (ITEM) are doing their job?

    a. the Republicans in Congress   Approve 39%    Disapprove 59%

    b. the Democrats in Congress     Approve 54%   Disapprove 54%      

         Nice to see the American public finally beginning to see these morons in the White house for what they really are.

     

    Tags:

                             

                    

    The Bush War Funding Rhetoric

    Resident Bush:  “The clock is ticking for our troops. Congress’s failure to fund our troops will mean that the readiness of our forces will suffer.”

      This is what Resident Bush said yesterday while he had family members of some of the troops surrounding him.

    NYTIMES

    With a showdown looming, Mr. Bush has been using the only real ammunition he has: his presidential platform. In a speech to an American Legion Post last Tuesday, he warned that without the new funds, the Army might be forced to delay the formation of new combat brigade teams, a move that he said could require the Pentagon to extend some soldiers’ tours in Iraq and Afghanistan.

    But the next day, the Pentagon announced that it already had plans to extend troops tours in a move unrelated to the war financing issue.

       So now the moron is using troop family members for his photo-op's and to hopefully convince the Congress that it is in the U.S. troops best interest to give him the funding that he seeks with no strings attached.

        As the times article above notes, the Pentagon had already planned on the extended troop stay in Iraq anyway so Bush pretty much verified that he is nothing but a liar to begin with.

    Senator Jack Reed:  “The status quo that he’s talking about, which is basically, ‘Just give me the money, I’m going to do what I want to do,’ is rejected by an overwhelming number of Americans. They want to see some change.”

       Of course and the military generals and such will now start making public the fact that the military is running out of parts and supplies and a few other things in an attempt to make the Congress look bad.

       The usual Repugnican bullshit so that Bush can stop being a cry-baby. This man ( ? ) is pathetic! Plain and simple! The entire Republican base is pathetic and that is a harsh statement coming from a real former conservative.

           IMPEACH! INDICT! IMPRISON!

    Tags: