Be INFORMED

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

All Those Jobs Are Going Overseas…

   ….and you can bet your ass that that is not going to change in our lifetimes!

Original Article

All those jobs going overseas.

by Steve Love      Wed Dec 29, 2010
("Companies are hiring – overseas"  Dallas Morning News 12/29/2010)

      Item #1:  Caterpillar hires as many people overseas as it does in the U.S.  Why? Because there is a massive building boom overseas that has a demand for the earthmoving machines Caterpillar makes.  There is nothing in the U.S. comparable to the apartment, highway and railway construction going on in China.

     Item #2:  "There is a huge difference between what is good for American companies vs. what is good for the American economy," says Robert Scott, spokesman for the Economic Policy Institute.   Why?  The down-side of the dollar being the dominant international currency is that a dollar earned anywhere in the world is as valuable as one earned in the United States.  So U.S. companies take their business to where they can make the most dollars and that is no longer in the United States.
     Item #3:  "Companies will go where there are fast-growing markets and big profits," says Jeffery Sachs, economist, Columbia University.   Where are those fast-growing markets?  Where the middle class is growing.  Why there?  Because that is where there is disposable income and high demand for consumer goods.    And where is the middle class growing?  "By 2015, the middle class in Asia will be as large as that in Europe and North America," the article goes on to say.  This is the hand-writing on the wall that we need to be reading!
     And about those "big profits?"   Where are they?  Certainly not where "Everyday low prices" is the gospel of business.   Big profits do not take place where the margin between the fixed cost of an item and the selling price is constantly shrinking.    Wal-Mart is profitable, not because it makes a reasonable profit on every item it sells but because it makes a minimal profit on massive numbers of items sold...a great model for a few mass-marketers but a formula for "little or no profits" for everyone else.   Small businesses cannot operate on a Wal-Mart business model...as is clear across this country as hundreds of thousands of small business have tried to compete with Wal-Mart and failed.  
     Small businesses thrived in the post-WWII era precisely because there was a reasonable margin between fixed costs and price and, most importantly, there was a middle class being formed receiving wages high enough that a couple of dollar cheaper was not sufficient motivation to change buying habits...something we have not seen in the United States since wages began stagnating three decades ago.    
     Item #4:  "China just became the world’s second-largest economy," says David Wyss, chief economist at Standard & Poor’s, who goes on to report that half of the S&P’s revenue now comes from overseas.   Which is just another way to say that Wall Street does not just share Manhattan Island with the United Nations - it shares its place in the world as an international institution.
     So, what do we know?  Beginning in the late 20th Century, there appears to have been set in motion a process by which the U.S. economy has been made further and further irrelevant.   The dollar is still the currency of the world however, when it comes to being the producers of goods the world wants to buy or being the creative center for innovations, no one is looking to the United States anymore.    The days of an American-centric world economy are gone.
     What passes for a domestic economy is one gigantic system designed to transfer what wealth the middle class still has, after three decades of stagnate wages and a lowering standard of living, to the moneyed elite: the 0.01% of the population who control the lion share of the nation’s wealth.   And when that transfer is complete we will join the other banana republics of the world.
     Or then, we shall become, as England became after all its colonies went their separate ways, a nation of shop-keepers, unless....unless we have the political leadership to challenge almost every element of what is accepted as economic common wisdom, and focuses like a laser on rebuilding the middle class by setting the nation on a course of nothing less than a complete reshaping of the American economy and modernization of its infrastructure.

Tuesday, December 28, 2010

Chris Hedges' Disturbing Dystopian Vision Of The Present

by Lefty Coaster     Tue Dec 28, 2010     Original Article

I found Chris Hedges' dystopian vision of the present to be disturbingly close to the mark. I had to share it with everyone here even though I don't take quite as dim a view as Hedges does of our present predicament.

2011: A Brave New Dystopia

We have been gradually disempowered by a corporate state that, as Huxley foresaw, seduced and manipulated us through sensual gratification, cheap mass-produced goods, boundless credit, political theater and amusement. While we were entertained, the regulations that once kept predatory corporate power in check were dismantled, the laws that once protected us were rewritten and we were impoverished. Now that credit is drying up, good jobs for the working class are gone forever and mass-produced goods are unaffordable, we find ourselves transported from "Brave New World" to "1984." The state, crippled by massive deficits, endless war and corporate malfeasance, is sliding toward bankruptcy.

Hedges talks about inverted totalitarianism which he describes like this:

In inverted totalitarianism, the sophisticated technologies of corporate control, intimidation and mass manipulation, which far surpass those employed by previous totalitarian states, are effectively masked by the glitter, noise and abundance of a consumer society. Political participation and civil liberties are gradually surrendered. The corporation state, hiding behind the smokescreen of the public relations industry, the entertainment industry and the tawdry materialism of a consumer society, devours us from the inside out. It owes no allegiance to us or the nation. It feasts upon our carcass.

Our systems of mass communication, as Wolin writes, "block out, eliminate whatever might introduce qualification, ambiguity, or dialogue, anything that might weaken or complicate the holistic force of their creation, to its total impression."

The result is a monochromatic system of information. Celebrity courtiers, masquerading as journalists, experts and specialists, identify our problems and patiently explain the parameters. All those who argue outside the imposed parameters are dismissed as irrelevant cranks, extremists or members of a radical left. Prescient social critics, from Ralph Nader to Noam Chomsky, are banished. Acceptable opinions have a range of A to B. The culture, under the tutelage of these corporate courtiers, becomes, as Huxley noted, a world of cheerful conformity, as well as an endless and finally fatal optimism. We busy ourselves buying products that promise to change our lives, make us more beautiful, confident or successful as we are steadily stripped of rights, money and influence.

Our manufacturing base has been dismantled. Speculators and swindlers have looted the U.S. Treasury and stolen billions from small shareholders who had set aside money for retirement or college. Civil liberties, including habeas corpus and protection from warrantless wiretapping, have been taken away. Basic services, including public education and health care, have been handed over to the corporations to exploit for profit. The few who raise voices of dissent, who refuse to engage in the corporate happy talk, are derided by the corporate establishment as freaks.

As a protester at the 1999 WTO meeting in Seattle I well remember being type cast in the MSM as anarchist rioters when 99% of the protesters taking part were non-violent. This year the MSM still erroneously refers to the WTO protests as riots. In fact the vast majority of the violence involved came from the Seattle Police when they attacked mostly nonviolent protesters.

Hedges goes on to argue that our Orwellian Dystopia of subtle manipulation is transforming into a Dystopia relying on brutal oppression more like that found in 1984.

Hedges whole unsettling essay is well worth reading.

2011: A Brave New Dystopia