What A Shocker! Romney Lied About ‘Binders Full Of Women’ Anecdote

By Liberal Lamp Post    October 17, 2012

Obama had Romney on the ropes on topics ranging from jobs, the Keystone Pipeline, and China at last night’s second debate. But, the real zinger, Romney delivered to himself.

When asked how he would promote pay equity for women, as Obama did with the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act of 2009, Romney dodged the question. Instead, he spun a tale about how, as governor of Massachusetts, he made a special effort to appoint more women to senior-level positions.

The only problem is, the story Romney told was false. He didn’t seek out qualified women as he claimed, and the number of women working under Romney in senior-level positions actually decreased by almost 10% during his term.

“And – and so we – we took a concerted effort to go out and find women who had backgrounds that could be qualified to become members of our cabinet. I went to a number of women’s groups and said: ‘’Can you help us find folks,’ and they brought us whole binders full of women.”

Before the end of the debate, the ‘binders full of women’ comment had gone viral, spawning a Twitter storm, graphics on Tumblr, and a Facebook page with almost 260,000 fans at time of press. The phrase was also the third-fastest rising search on Google during the debate.

Here’s what actually happened: A group of Massachusetts women’s advocates called MassGAP collaborated on identifying women qualified to assume senior government positions before Romney even took office, according to David Bernstein and others familiar with the binders Romney is describing. The women’s group took the initiative to deliver the data to Romney; he did not request it as he indicated in the debate. Bernstein writes:

“[MassGAP] did the research and put together the binder full of women qualified for all the different cabinet positions, agency heads, and authorities and commissions. They presented this binder to Governor Romney when he was elected. I have written about this before, in various contexts; tonight I’ve checked with several people directly involved in the MassGAP effort who confirm that this history as I’ve just presented it is correct – and that Romney’s claim tonight, that he asked for such a study, is false.”

Let’s look at how Romney’s record with women really stacks up:

• Representation of women in senior state government positions fell from 30% before Romney took office to 27.6% at the end of his term. His successor immediately reversed that trend.
• Bain Capital, the company Romney headed for more than 15 years, counts only 8% women among its 87 managing directors and senior executives — meaning the company appoints males to senior positions 92% of the time.
• In 2005, Governor Romney vetoed a Massachusetts bill requiring hospitals to provide emergency contraception to rape victims.
• In 2004, Romney terminated Ardith Wieworka, a lesbian woman, from the Massachusetts Office of Child Care Services. Wieworka believes she was fired because she made public her intention to marry her partner as the Governor furiously tried to roll back the legalization of gay marriage in the state.
• Earlier this year, when Romney’s campaign was asked if he supported legislation to ensure equal pay for women, his staff fell silent and told the reporter, “We’ll get back to you on that.” What else could you expect from a man who doesn’t consider women his equals?

So, you tell me, is Romney really interested in helping women?

Technorati Tags: Mitt Romney,Barack Obama,2012 Elections,Equel Pay,Womens Rights,Current Events

Don't Credit Mitt Romney For Great Massachusetts Schools

  Debate number 2 happens this evening between Mitt Romney and President Obama in which Mitt will more than likely attempt to take credit for anything good that happened in Massachusetts while he was Governor. In fact, the only thing of substance to work in the state was Romneycare.

Isn't it funny how when Romney is trying to make up education policy credentials for himself, suddenly he wants us to remember that he was governor of Massachusetts, a time in his life he's mostly tried to erase on the campaign trail? In the debate, he claimed that "I've been there. Massachusetts schools are ranked number one in the nation. This is not because I didn’t have commitment to education. It’s because I care about education for all of our kids."

But Romney's taking credit for something he doesn't own:

Bay State students routinely score at the top on national and international tests. But that achievement is largely credited to the state’s 1993 landmark education reform law that poured billions of dollars into schools, set academic standards, and spawned the standardized testing that Romney fiercely guarded. [...]

Overall test scores grew incrementally during Romney’s tenure. The achievement of non-native English speakers — a demographic whose progress Romney targeted during his gubernatorial campaign against bilingual education — barely budged.

Massachusetts doesn't miraculously have great schools because Mitt Romney cared. Romney became governor of a state that already had great schools. He managed not to screw that up when it came to K-12 education, something that can't be said for higher education, which he hurt badly. Not exactly anything to brag about.

Originally posted to Daily Kos Labor on Thu Oct 04, 2012

Technorati Tags: 2012 Elections,Mitt Romney,Education,Massachusetts,Current Events