Iraq and Bush's Lies on the Escalation

A new report  by the Congressional Budget Office found that the administration's request for just over 20,000 combat troops would require a deployment of as many as 28,000 additional personnel, including support and logistics troops and contractors

On Bush's sending an additional 20,000 troops to Iraq we have this from the Washington Post,

"That could mean the plan would involve up to 48,000 troops and contractors, at a cost of between $9 billion and $13 billion for the first four months and up to $27 billion for the first year." The report contradicts testimony given Congress just last week by the Army Chief of Staff.

   I guess that Bush conveniently forgot the extras that would be needed for this fiasco. Of course, Bush also understated the cost of this escalation by saying that it would only cost some $3 billion.

Equipment For Added Troops Is Lacking

New Iraq Forces Must Make Do, Officials Say

By Ann Scott Tyson

Washington Post Staff Writer
Tuesday, January 30, 2007

Boosting U.S. troop levels in Iraq by 21,500 would create major logistical hurdles for the Army and Marine Corps, which are short thousands of vehicles, armor kits and other equipment needed to supply the extra forces, U.S. officials said.

The increase would also further degrade the readiness of U.S.-based ground forces, hampering their ability to respond quickly, fully trained and well equipped in the case of other military contingencies around the world and increasing the risk of U.S. casualties, according to Army and Marine Corps leaders.

       "New Iraqi Forces Must Make Do," is what the officials are saying.

    They will not have the armor, vehicles or equipment needed. I wonder, will our people have the bullets for their machine guns and so forth?

   Somebody needs to slap that bitch up in the White House up beside his damned head and wake him the fuck up! Sending under -equipped troops into war is like going to a gun fight with a knife as your weapon!

    What planet is this dumbass living on because it sure the hell is not planet earth? This piece of slime needs to go and crawl back under his rock so someone can step on it!

                               IMPEACH! INDICT! IMPRISON!

 

Technorati tags: Iraq, Bush, Escalation

 

Legal and Human Rights Groups Issue Open Letter Warning Of Illegality Of any Offensive Military Action By U.S. Against Iran

   From Commondreams.Org we have this wonderful piece on human rights groups and other issuing a letter on the illegality of military action against Iran.

 

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
FEBRUARY 1, 2007
11:57 AM

CONTACT: National Lawyers Guild
212 679-5100

Legal And Human Rights Groups Issue Open Letter Warning Of Illegality Of Any Offensive Military Action By U.S. Against Iran

WASHINGTON - February 1 - Today European, international and United States legal and human rights groups issued an open letter warning of the illegality of any offensive military action by the United States against Iran. Signatories include the American Association of Jurists, Center for Constitutional Rights (U.S.), Droite Solidarite (France), European Association of Lawyers for Human Rights and Democracy, Italian Association of Democratic Lawyers, Haldane Society (United Kingdom), International Association of Democratic Lawyers, Indian Association of Lawyers, (India), Japanese Association of Lawyers for International Solidarity, (Japan), Lawyers Against War (Canada), National Lawyers Guild (U.S.), Progress Lawyers Network (Belgium).
Open Letter to All Members of Congress, the Bush Administration And the U.S. Armed Forces From Legal and Human Rights Groups
There are increasing indications that the Bush administration intends to take military action against Iran. There are also indications that the administration would support military action by Israel against Iran.
The undersigned organizations issue this Open Letter to All Members of Congress, the Administration and the U.S. Armed Forces to reiterate their affirmative duties to prevent military action and to refrain from ongoing threats to peace.
Offensive military action against Iran would be illegal, as the United States is bound under the United Nations Charter to settle international disputes by peaceful means and to refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity of any state or act in any other manner inconsistent with the purpose of the United Nations. (Article 2 sections 3 and 4). While Article 51 of the charter recognizes the inherent right of individual or collective self defense, such a right exists only if an armed attack occurs and is allowed only until the Security Council can take measures necessary to maintain international peace and security. Any other type of military action by the United States would not be in compliance with the UN Charter.
The UN Charter, as a treaty ratified by the U.S., is part of the Supreme Law of the United States under Article VI §2 of the United States Constitution. If the President and Congress fail to abide by the law as provided in the Constitution they violate their sacred oaths of office.
Any military action against Iran in the absence of a military strike by Iran would be a war of aggression outlawed under Article 2(4) of the UN Charter.
If the United States or any other nation were to act outside of its UN obligations it would risk starting a war of aggression and committing a crime against peace. Furthermore, the sending of aircraft carriers combined with recent threatening statements constitutes a threat to wage a war with Iran. This is also prohibited by the Charter. Principle VI of the Nuremberg Principles also makes crimes against peace punishable under international law. Crimes against peace include: planning, preparation, initiation or waging a war of aggression in violation of international treaties, agreements, or assurances, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy to accomplish these acts.
The United States and all countries that have ratified the UN Charter are required to abide by their obligations under it. It is in the interests of all countries of the world that the United Nations be a viable multilateral institution capable of carrying out the mission of its charter to preserve peace and promote development and human rights. Actions which violate that charter undermine it. Actions by the U.S. which violate the charter prevent the UN from acting effectively; they also undermine the credibility of the United States in the world community. The U.S. cannot demand that other countries obey the terms of the UN Charter while it is violating those very provisions with impunity.
The War Powers Act, which requires congressional approval of military action, must be read consistently with our obligations under the UN Charter and international law not to engage in wars of aggression. We urge:
1. The President, Vice President, and all other members of the Bush administration who have a decision-making role with regard to taking military action in Iran, to immediately renounce such efforts to engage in this war;
2. The members of the military to refuse any requests by the administration to invade or take other military action against Iran in light of the illegality of such actions; and
3. That Congress immediately pass a binding resolution reaffirming the United States’ legal obligations and informing the President and the administration that it will not concur in any invasion of or military action against Iran, would refuse to approve funding for any such military action, and would consider actions taken in contravention of the resolution as impeachable offenses.
The American Association of Jurists
Vanessa Ramos, Secretary General, vramos1565 at aol.com
Clea Carpi da Rocha, President, carpi at pro.via-rs.com.br
Beinusz Szmukler, szmukler at ciudad.com.ar
The Center for Constitutional Rights
Vincent Warren, Executive Director, vwarren at ccr-ny.org
Bill Goodman, Legal Director, bgoodman at ccr-ny.org
Droite Solidarite
Roland Weyl, President, mrwjur at club-internet.fr
European Association of Lawyers for Democracy and Human Rights
RA Thomas Schmid, Secretary General, ra-th-schmidt at t-online.dem
Professor Bill Bowring, b.bowring at bbk.ac.uk
Haldane Society, United Kingdom
Liz Davies, liz at lizdavies.demon.co.uk
International Association of Democratic Lawyers
Jitendra Sharma, President, jsharma at vsnl.com
Jeanne Mirer, Secretary General, mirerfam at earthlink.net
Indian Association of Lawyers
Mr. G.K.Bansal, General Secretary, gkb at gkbco.com
Mr. T.M.Mohammed Youseff, General Secretary, youseffdelhi at gmail.com
Italian Association of Democratic Lawyers
Fabio Marcelli, fabio.marcelli at isgi.cnr.it
Japanese Association of Lawyers for International Solidarity, Japan
Osamu Niikura, Secretary General, oniikura at als.aoyama.ac.jp
Lawyers Against the War, Canada
Gail Davidson, Chair, law at portal.ca
National Lawyers Guild
Marjorie Cohn, President, libertad48 at san.rr.com
Progress Lawyers Network, Belgium
Jan Fermon, jan.fermon at progresslaw.net

 

Technorati tags: Human Rights Groups, Iran, Illegality, U.S., Military