Be INFORMED

Wednesday, May 16, 2007

Alberto Gonzales And Bush Should Be Prosecuted For The Ashcroft Fiasco

    Earlier this morning, I made mention about dear old Alberto Gonzales and one of his side-kicks trying to pressure John Ashcroft into signing the wiretapping law that president Bush wanted. As we all know, Ashcroft pretty much told Gonzales and Mr. Card to go fuck themselves.

  I get emails from American Progress Action Fund once in a while and I thought that I would share a little more details on the " Gonzo " goes stupid story.

Talking Points: A Dramatic Standoff

May 16, 2007

In March 2004, President Bush's warrantless domestic spying program was temporarily suspended after then-acting Attorney General James Comey refused to sign onto an extension of the program, citing an "extensive review" by the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel stating "that the program did not comply with the law." In "gripping testimony" yesterday before the Senate Judiciary Committee, Comey revealed extraordinary details about the efforts made by Alberto Gonzales and Andrew Card -- then-White House counsel and chief of staff, respectively -- to persuade John Ashcroft to overrule Comey, even as Ashcroft was debilitated in an intensive care unit with pancreatitis. The Washington Post calls Comey's "account of Bush administration lawlessness so shocking it would have been unbelievable coming from a less reputable source." Indeed, Comey's revelations confirm the worst fears about Alberto Gonzales' dangerously flawed judgment, and provide further evidence of the contempt for basic legal restraints displayed by the most senior administration officials, including President Bush.

  • The White House placed undue pressure on Attorney General Ashcroft while he lay in his hospital bed. Comey explained yesterday how the ordeal began on the evening of March 10, 2004, hours before the authority for the spying program was set to expire. A top aide to Ashcroft alerted Comey that Gonzales and Card had arranged a visit with Ashcroft, who was then hospitalized with gallstone pancreatitis. Comey "ordered his driver to rush him to George Washington University Hospital with emergency lights flashing and a siren blaring, to intercept the pair." Comey "arrived first in the darkened room, in time to brief Mr. Ashcroft, who he said seemed barely conscious." Minutes later, Gonzales and Card arrived, envelope in hand, and explained that they were seeking his approval to extend authority for warrantless spying. "Attorney General Ashcroft then stunned me," Comey said yesterday. "He lifted his head off the pillow and in very strong terms expressed his view of the matter, rich in both substance and fact...and then laid his head back down on the pillow, seemed spent, and said to them, But that doesn't matter, because I'm not the attorney general...and he pointed to me." The White House effort to overrule Comey had failed. "The two men did not acknowledge me," Comey said. "They turned and walked from the room." Comey added, "I was angry. I had just witnessed an effort to take advantage of a very sick man... I thought he had conducted himself in a way that demonstrated a strength I had never seen before, but still I thought it was improper."
  • It took the threat of mass resignation for the White House to change the wiretapping program in the ways Justice demanded. The next morning, March 11, it was reauthorized "without a signature from the Department of Justice attesting as to its legality." Comey had seen enough, and wrote up his resignation letter. "I couldn't stay, if the administration was going to engage in conduct that the Department of Justice had said had no legal basis. I just simply couldn't stay." Comey said yesterday that he believed both Mueller and Ashcroft were prepared to resign with him, along with all of their top aides. One day later, on March 12, facing a threat of mass resignations, the administration cracked. Bush informed Mueller that he would authorize the changes in the program sought by the Justice Department. Comey said he signed the reauthorization "two or three weeks" later. "It was unclear from his testimony what authority existed for the program while the changes were being made."
  • The President and the Attorney General have shown a disturbing contempt for the Justice Department and the law. The Washington Post notes that "the bottom line" of Comey's revelations is "the administration's alarming willingness...to ignore its own lawyers." After all, the Justice Department's conclusions "are supposed to be the final word in the executive branch about what is lawful or not, and the administration has emphasized since the warrantless wiretapping story broke that it was being done under the department's supervision." The fact that Alberto Gonzales "is now in charge of the department he tried to steamroll may be most disturbing of all." Moreover, President Bush's direct role in this affair remains to be fully explored. Comey noted yesterday that Ashcroft's wife "had banned all visitors and all phone calls" to the hospital, but that Card and Gonzales were permitted to visit Ashcroft after a direct call from the White House. "I have some recollection that the call was from the president himself," he said.

   Bush just got kicked in the ribs on this one and I hope that many more shots are forthcoming.

Tags:

Paul Wolfowitz Working On Resignation

WASHINGTON - Embattled World Bank President Paul Wolfowitz is negotiating an agreement to resign, according to an official familiar with the talks.

His departure would include an acknowledgment from the bank that he doesn't bear sole responsibility for the controversy surrounding a generous pay package for his girlfriend, the official said.

The negotiations were taking place as the bank's board resumed deliberations over Wolfowitz's fate Wednesday afternoon.

The official said Wolfowitz wanted the bank to accept some responsibility for conflicts of interest cited against him by a special bank panel. The official spoke on condition of anonymity because of the delicate state of the negotiations.       Yahoo News

  Wolfowitz is negotiation a deal so that he doesn't sound like the crook that he is and so that, as is usual with a Bush lackey, he doesn't have to take the responsibility for his own actions.

  Maybe members of the World Bank should have paid closer attention to this hood, but, Wolfie bears the full responsibility for his actions since I'm sure that bank members pushed him into paying an inexperienced piece of ass a high salary for next to doing nothing. ( sarcasm intended )

Riza worked for the bank before Wolfowitz took over as president in June 2005. She was moved to the State Department to avoid a conflict of interest, but stayed on the bank's payroll. Her salary went from close to $133,000 to $180,000. With subsequent raises, it eventually rose to $193,590. The panel concluded that the salary increase Riza received "at Mr. Wolfowitz's direction was in excess of the range" allowed under bank rules.

   The next part of this mess which should be investigated is how did the slut manage to keep drawing her salary from the world Bank after she was transferred to the State Department. For that matter, how is it she also continued to receive raises for a job that she was no longer doing?

 

Tags:  

Senator Hagel Calls For Alberto Gonzales To Resign

Sen. Chuck Hagel (R):"The American people deserve an attorney general, the chief law enforcement officer of our country, whose honesty and capability are beyond question. Attorney General Gonzales can no longer meet this standard. He has failed this country. He has lost the moral authority to lead."

"Alberto Gonzales should resign now.

    So Senator Hagel becomes another one of the Republican establishment to call for Alberto Gonzales to resign after it was revealed during testimony yesterday by James Comey, former deputy to John Ashcroft, that Gonzales had pressured Ashcroft to approve of the legality of George Bush's warrantless wiretapping idea. Ashcroft, who was very ill at the time with pancreatitis, pretty much told Alberto ' no'.

   Bush being Bush, went ahead with the program without the approval of the Justice Department which caused Comey, Ashcroft, and Robert Mueller ( FBI Director ) to contemplate resigning. Bush did change the program to be inline with Justice concerns.     Source

  The problems with the Department of Justice ( injustice ) keeps getting better day by day, does it not?

Comey's testimony proved compelling enough to inspire a Hagel to demand that Gonzales step down.

At issue was Bush's no-warrant wiretapping program, which Comey described as so questionable that Ashcroft refused for a time to reauthorize it as required in March, 2004.

Senior government officials had expressed concerns about whether the National Security Agency, which administered the program, had the proper oversight in place. Other concerns included whether any president possessed the legal and constitutional authority to authorize the program as it operated at the time.

Days before the program's required recertification in March, 2004, Ashcroft suddenly fell ill enough with pancreatitis that he transferred the powers of the attorney general to Comey. Acting Attorney General Comey, too, refused to certify the program's legality.

On March 10, Gonzales, then White House Counsel, and Bush's former chief of staff, Andy Card, took the matter to Ashcroft as he lay in the intensive care unit at George Washington University Hospital. Tipped to their impending visit, Comey raced there with the sirens of his security detail blaring, he told the committee Tuesday.

Comey arrived at Ashcroft's bedside moments before the president's aides walked in, Gonzales holding the presidential order of recertification.

Ashcroft rebuffed them, pointing out that Comey held the powers of the attorney general at that moment. Gonzales and Card left the room without acknowledging Comey.

Card later demanded that Comey come to the White House. Comey said he demanded a witness accompany him after the conduct he'd seen at Ashcroft's bed side.

Card "replied, 'What conduct? We were just there to wish him well,'" Comey recalled.

 

Tags:  

San Antonio Spurs and Dirty Play

This is in response to a comment which was posted.

Anonymous said ... "GET OVER IT MICHAEL. QUIT CRYING LIKE A BABY. IF YOU CAN'T STAND THE HEAT GET OFF THE COURT. THE NBA IS A LEAGUE OF MEN, PLAYING BASKETBALL, NOT PANSIES."
Get over it? So I take it that it would be okay with you if we're playing a game of basketball and I just decide to knee you in your groin? It would be okay with you if I just elbow you while you are dribbling down the court, sending you into the scorers table?
So far as the heat on the court goes. I guess that the Spurs couldn't stand the heat when the Suns started coming back so a player opened up the " cheap shot " manual.
To the other commenter, I like the Spurs myself. they would be my other choice after the Suns because Arizona is my birthplace. What I do not like is any player pulling the crap that was done on Monday night. From any team.

News Brief's For Wednesday Morning

WASHINGTON - A small group of Republican senators, led by Virginia's John Warner, is coalescing around legislation that would threaten billions of dollars in U.S. aid to Iraq and make clear American troops will stay only as long as Baghdad lives up to its promises.

  "The United States strategy in Iraq, hereafter, shall be conditioned on the Iraqi government meeting benchmarks," a draft of the proposal says. 

GOP Sen's. Susan Collins  and Olympia Snowe of Maine and Norm Coleman  of Minnesota also were working with Warner, former chairman of the Armed Services Committee, to draft the legislation and were expected to support it.

Under the proposal, the president would have to certify that Baghdad was making "satisfactory progress" on political and security reforms or cut off U.S. aid. However, the president would be allowed to waive the restriction. Bush requested about $2 billion in economic assistance for Iraq through September.     Yahoo News

   Nothing but the GOP attempting to avoid their own massacre in 2008.

----------------------------------

   MLK's daughter,Yolanda King, dies at 51

ATLANTA, Georgia (AP) -- Yolanda Denise King, the Rev. Martin Luther King Jr.'s eldest child who pursued her father's dream of racial harmony through acting and motivational speaking, has died. She was 51.

King died late Tuesday in Santa Monica, California, said Steve Klein, a spokesman for the King Center. The family did not know the cause of death but that relatives think it might have been a heart problem, he said.    CNN

---------------------------------

White House Support for Wolfowitz Wavers

The Bush administration softened its support for World Bank President Paul D. Wolfowitz yesterday, signaling a willingness to replace him if the bank's executive board resolves an ethics controversy without firing him.

"All options are on the table," said White House spokesman Tony Snow, addressing reporters at a morning briefing. "Members of the board, Mr. Wolfowitz, need to sit down and figure out what is in fact going to be best for this bank. . . ."           Washington Post

-------------------------------

Ashcroft almost quit over eavesdropping

WASHINGTON, May 16 (UPI) -- Former U.S. Attorney General John Ashcroft nearly resigned after the White House recertified an anti-terrorism program, another former official told Congress.

Former Deputy Attorney General James Comey testified before the Senate

Judiciary Committee that he, Ashcroft and other officials were poised to resign when the White House went ahead with a counter-terrorism program that Ashcroft had refused to approve, The Washington Post reported Wednesday.

Tags:  

Tuesday, May 15, 2007

Senator John Warner After DoD For Blocking Social Website's YouTube, MySpace and Others From U.S. Troops Access

   You all know by now that those rocket scientist at the Department of Defense have decided that it will start blocking their computers  and networks from access to such sites as MySpace, Youtube, and about 11 other website's. This will be a worldwide ban and will go into effect this Monday.  Source

  But not so fast DoD!

Sen. John Warner (R-Va., Armed Services Committee) stated today that he will investigate this decision by the Pentagon.

Warner: “Believe me, I am going to jump on that like a June bug right now. I’ve got a call into the Pentagon saying, ‘Hey guys, what is the rationale?"

  The Pentagon is using the old security issue concern as their reason for cutting our troops off of these sites. Guess that Bush and his hired hands are getting a little tired of the troops posting videos of themselves and the carnage that they have to live with everyday while the Iraqi country goes to shit and our president lies about it.

  Of course, this would be in line with the Iraqi government deciding that news reporters and camera men are no longer allowed at car-bombing sites and such because they may be destroying evidence that the local police may need.

  One thing that I would like explained to me. Four year old war going on and Bush and Iraq just now coming up with these things? Come on now! If it took you people this long to think that evidence might be getting messed up, then Bush and his puppets are really as dumb and stupid as we have believed them to be.

   These two new rules are nothing but Bush/military ways of attempting to hide the truth about what is actually going on in Iraq.

  For all of you with son's and daughters/ husbands and wives in Iraq, I have a " work around " for the YouTube, MySpace problem that the Pentagon is so suddenly concerned about.

Tags:

San Antonio Spurs " Dirty " Playbook Against Phoenix Suns

   I'm going to go off track here and talk a bit about something is one of my favorite hobbies, and that is basketball. The NBA playoffs in particular and the Phoenix Suns specifically and the crap that they have had to put up with from those " dirty "  players of the San Antonio Spurs, a team which I use to have respect for.

  That was until the playoff series with Phoenix began.

   First we have Suns All-star Amare Stoudemire saying, after last Thursdays practice, that the Spurs are a "dirty team" and he said that Bruce Bowen tried to hurt him, claiming that Bowen, "He kicked me purposely in the back of my Achilles'. I almost came down wrong and he almost caused an injury.He's known for doing that. I just hope the NBA and the commissioner take a look at that because it's definitely a dirty play."

  Thus far, since then, he has seemed to be right on the money about the Spurs and their form of play.

  Stoudemire also had a bit more to say about the style of play from the Spurs during the regular season.

"I think the Spurs are a dirty team. I mean, (Manu) Ginobili during the regular season kneed me in the crotch on purpose. I just hope the league takes a look at it and cleans the game up a little bit." 

  Here is a video, which I think definitely shows Amare getting kicked by Bowen.

    Then there was game three, in which Bowen kneed Steve Nash in the groin area. That drew a foul from the referee which was upgraded to a "flagrant foul 1." Bowen told Nash that it was an unintentional move. Sure it was.

  Then there is last nights game four. This was a tough game all the way around, but dirty tactics should have no place in this game or any other game.

   The Spurs had a 97-92 with 2:23 to play when Phoenix picked up the pace and took the lead 53 seconds left and nailed it in with 32 seconds to go that made it 100-97.

Robert Horry took the low road with 18 seconds left in the game,when he hit Nash with a forearm and knocked him into the scorer's table. This was a move that was totally uncalled for by this piece of shit.

    Horry was ejected from the game and given a flagrant foul. The Spurs had started the 4th quarter with an 80-72 lead over Phoenix but I guess a few of the Spur's players can't handle a team on the comeback path as Phoenix did last night, so they resorted to taking cheap shots.

 Robert Horry ( whorie? )  should be suspended for the remainder of this series and fined massively by the NBA. That other Spurs punk, Bruce Bowen, will get his in due time.

     It is pretty sad that such great players as Tim Duncan, Michael Finley, Manu Ginobili and the rest of the Spurs have to play with team-mates such as these gutter crawlers.

 

Tags:

Hell In Iraq Manufactured By Washington

     The following post is a piece written by Marshall Adame who is a North Carolina Democrat running for U.S. Congress  in 2008.  Mr. Adame spent 3 years working in Iraq and had a few things to say about the situation there.

      Original at Daily Kos

Iraq; A Hell on Earth Made in Washington D.C.

by Marshall Adame Sun May 13, 2007 

Why America went into Iraq is something for the pundits, academics and the politicians to discuss into the next century. What has happened there since our arrival is something I can only hope will be fully realized and understood by the American public and every elected official in our country.

From my personal experiences of living in Iraq for three years, I have concluded America’s leadership is solely responsible for the entire country of Iraq becoming a living hell of suffering, poverty, starvation and depravation, unimaginable to either Iraqi or U.S. citizen just prior to our arrival in Iraq in 2003.

I personally attended and participated in many high level Coalition, State Department and DoD meetings and briefings in Iraq from 2003 until late 2006.
I remember being astounded, on many occasions, about the way we addressed the needs and requirements of the Iraqi people and their government. On one occasion after another, where the decision makers in Iraq had glowing opportunities to move Iraq in the right direction, the smallest suggestion that action being considered might be politically incorrect could, and often did, derail any further talk or action and everyone would be back to square one. More than not, it was the Military planners in the Embassy who would stop any worthwhile State Department initiative.  

It seemed to me that the leadership in the Embassy in Baghdad were very unaware, almost detached, from what the average U.S. Soldier was experiencing on a day to day basis outside of Baghdad’s green zone where life was actually pretty close to just being normal. Although the senior officers in the Embassy would, from time to time, fly out to the Forward Operating Bases (FOBs), their arrival and departure was always very scheduled and planned. Very rarely would any of these officers actually go outside of a FOB where the troops were going everyday amongst the Iraqi general population.

Let me be very clear here. No act of courage, sacrifice, bravery, or selflessness is ever wasted, or for nothing, irregardless of when or where it happens. Our soldiers are carrying out their duty as they took an oath to do. You will not find any soldiers in Iraq who are not faithful and dedicated to their Commanders and to each other. Risking their lives for each other is a daily event for our soldiers in Iraq. This is as it should be. The senior officers however seemed to me to be somewhat different in that regard. Their future in the military and their promotion potential seemed to be factored into just about every decision. The real exception was the National Guard and Reserve component Senior officers who seemed always determined to get their soldiers what they needed and to be there for their soldiers. This is not to denigrate the Officer Corp, but it is what I noted during my extensive time in Iraq.

Donald Rumsfeld and General Casey seemed obsessed with ensuring The State Department (Condi Rice) did not get a firm foothold onto the leadership or management of the Iraq development planning, and that included the diplomatic part of the mission. From my perspective, the U.S. Ambassador was a figure head who simply did what General Casey and Don Rumsfeld decided needed to be accomplished by the State Department.

The Generals had all the money, they had the President’s ear and they controlled almost all the resources. They still do. The golden rule; He who has the gold, makes the rules. State Department diplomatic efforts, or operational plans were seemingly a nuisance to the Military planners in the Embassy.
This was very in evidence right into the later part of 2006. Recently I spoke to a Diplomat friend of mine in the Embassy in Baghdad who told me he would be leaving Iraq as a direct result of the way the Military has totally ignored the diplomats in Iraq and the Military leaders conduct in pushing the "Baghdad surge" now in place.

Why shouldn’t the Generals ignore the State Department? The President is squarely on the side of blunt force. Diplomacy to our President, apparently, is a tool for the weak. America has a long history of civilians controlling our military. In Iraq the U.S. military has no civilian control. The U.S. Ambassador is toothless.  

The Military Commanders throughout Iraq were very suspect of any Department of State program where the military was not in primary control and would often, quickly and openly, moved to derail it. The most visible example of this type of stonewalling is the Provincial Reconstruction Teams (PRT). The PRT is a State Department Program developed for the purpose of assisting the Provisional Governments, in the 14 Provinces of Iraq, in Government Capacity Building, Rule of Law, City planning, Contracting, taxing, revenue sharing, and other aspects of Governmental Services Delivery and maintenance.

I was a key player in the initiation of the PRT in Iraq during 2005 and 2006. My exposure was all encompassing and I personally traveled throughout the Provinces of Iraq to conduct the initial PRT surveys for the State Department. The PRTs were overseen and managed through an office in the Baghdad Embassy called the National Coordination Team (NCT). I was a member of the NCT.

Almost all of the planning and execution aspects of the PRT development was conducted without the smallest participation of any Iraqis, governmental, or not. In some construction projects, in the provinces, the Iraqi Provincial Councils were allowed to communicate their desired projects to the State Department. In most cases, either the U.S. Corps of Engineers would decide what they wanted to do, or a Military General in the U.S. Embassy would decide what would be most advantages from the American Point of view.  U.S. Contractors were big players here. The State Department had no real say-so at all in the selection of projects being conducted under the auspices of their own program. In 2006, the newly appointed civilian director of the NCT was a retired Army General. This appointment thereafter ensured the PRT compliance with the Military commanders in Iraq.

Many projects started by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers throughout Iraq, were never finished and many were simply de-scoped and made to appear complete when in fact they were not. Water plants and Electric plants in Iraq were built and never turned on. Iraqi Military bases were built under the auspices and direct supervision of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers who would complete the projects, only to standby and watch the Iraqis loot the newly built and furnished facilities to the bone. The U.S. Army Corps of engineers and the Program Contracting Office (PCO) themselves took a very large piece of the Iraq construction money; A very large piece. If it is ever investigated, I feel another scandal of waste, fraud and abuse will be in the headlines.

The Muslim Mosques, we built for the Iraqi Military, would usually remain intact. (We never built any Churches that I am aware of, although many Iraqis are of the Christian faith. Damaged or destroyed Churches remained rubble. For faiths other than Muslim, little or no money would ever be available for rebuilding or new development form the U.S. Government).

The Iraqi people and their government were worlds apart in their existence. The Iraqi government, almost in exile from it’s people, is located in the extensively secured Baghdad Green Zone near the U.S. Embassy. The U.S. Military ensures their security. The Ministers live in the Green Zone and most of the representatives as well, in very comfortable circumstances. I am told that as of January 2007 almost one third of the elected officials in Iraq are actually living in foreign countries like Jordon, England, and France. Still collecting their pay, just not in Iraq.  

The Iraqi population at large, with the exception of a few fearless and brave Iraqi politicians, never see their representatives, or even hear from them. Most Iraqi politicians are aligned with a Militia group who fight the U.S. on a daily basis, or are connected to the Shia Death squads that reign terror down on the Iraqi citizens every single day or their existence. An existence we created through very poor leadership, vision, planning or serious regard for the Iraqi population at large.

Just to get a glass of clean drinking water is a major effort in Iraq today, not to mention that many of those who are selling the clean water are also the same thugs, criminals and terrorist who are rampaging at night and profiting from the chaos by day. This after four years of U.S. Presence, over three thousand dead U.S. Soldiers, tens of thousands of U.S. Wounded and hundreds of Billions of U.S. Dollars. That is not even mentioning the hundreds of thousands Injured and killed Iraqi citizens, many who are children and women, and the millions displaced by the war and now living in abject poverty.

In Baghdad, should an injured Sunni Muslim show up to, or be brought to any government hospital in Baghdad, in all likely hood that person will not be alive the next day. Shia death squads, often members of the Iraqi Police, I am told visit the hospitals nightly looking for Sunni patients.

I believe the average American, or Iraqi citizen would be furious to know how President Bush, Vice President Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Bremer and others caused the societal and institutional collapse of what was a fairly well running, civilized and organized institutional culture.
Their collective decisions facilitated the American and British contractors in bringing thousands of third world nationals into Iraq while excluding the poor and unemployed Iraqi citizens from even earning a living or participating in the reconstruction of their own country. Many of whom later turned to the insurgency to earn a living.

The exercise of blind leadership has brought America to the brink of irrelevance, the exception being where military power is concerned, in the world and in all other aspects an outcast of sorts. Albeit, a very powerful outcast.  

Today the world of civilized societies who initially stepped forward with support and assistance, but later began to see the effort going far away from it’s intended beginning, now see a U.S. President out of touch with reality.
Most of those countries are now hoping America does not suffer further from President Bush’s continued presence in office. I am speaking of many countries who sent their own soldiers as well, although in very small numbers when compared to America and Great Briton.

Today I see a world of strong, democratic and free countries hoping and praying for America, their model, to once again find her bearing and lead the world in freedom, strength, integrity, as a force against those who would seek to derail mans progress into a future of liberty and justice for all. I believe they do want America to succeed for they know our downfall could well mean their own destruction.

When President Bush took office in 2000, America was a healthy, free, culturally expanding society whose reach and influence for good in the world was being embraced by friend and potential foe alike. During the preceding President Clinton years, the countries of the Middle East were looking to the U.S.A. to be the true and honest broker for peace. Israelis and Palestinians alike were beginning to believe that real peace could come to them after so many decades of war and suffering.

America had no debt to the world, after having been a debtor nation under the previous administrations of George Bush Sr. and President Ronald Reagan, President William Clinton was able to lead America out of debt and indeed left a surplus of over 250 Billion Dollars in the U.S. Treasury when he left office.

Now, under the leadership and authority of President George Bush Jr., America is between 8 and 10 Trillion dollars in debt to nations who do not consider us as real friends. Nations like China who holds over 1.3 Trillion Dollars of American Treasury Bonds. Bonds President Bush permitted them to buy. Consequently, we are broke, broken and groping for vision and leadership in America as the whole world watches the spectacle George Bush and the Republican Party has made of my country.

All of this our President continually blames on our tragedy of 9/11, Katrina and our failure to drill for oil in everyone’s back yard from N.Y. to Alaska. For a while America bought it. We wanted to believe that we were heading in a direction that could bring peace and safety back to the U.S. and the world. We were attacked and we struck back, as we had every right to do. Suddenly we diverted our eyes from those who attacked us and focused on Iraq where most of our precious resources were diverted to. Those who attacked us on 9/11? Still at large in Afghanistan and Pakistan knowing the U.S. will not seek them out so long as they remain bogged down in Iraq.

The Hell we have created for the Iraqis? Out of our control now. It has evolved into a full fledged and unhealthy civil war between religious factions who both are more than willing to sacrifice their children, their women, their boys and girls in order to get the advantage over the other they seek. I feel, in the final analysis, the numbers of foreign fighters purported to be in Iraq will turn out to actually be far fewer than the administration would have wanted us to believe. I believe it is the Iraqis we are fighting and who are fighting us.

By dissolving the Army, Police force, civil institutions and governmental control and program entitlement ministries, Paul Bremer started Iraq on the road it walks today. His de-bathification program sealed the fate and future of Iraq in 2003 and, I believe, caused the insurgency to be born. When Paul Bremer returned to America, he was awarded the American Medal of Freedom by President Bush.

In the mean time, my youngest son, Sergeant Benjamin Adame will return to Iraq for his second tour next month. My second son, Staff Sergeant William Adame, was also scheduled to return soon, but has been delayed due to complications from the shrapnel wounds he received in Baqubah Iraq when his convoy was ambushed in 2006.
Thank God for small favors.

Today there is chaos in Iraq. When we leave, there will be chaos in Iraq for a time, but until we leave Iraq, the beginning of the end of chaos in Iraq cannot start.

Tags:

Monday, May 14, 2007

Monica Goodling: Right Wing Christianity At It's lowest

Her legal experience was limited; she had graduated in 1999 from Regent University School of Law, which was founded by Pat Robertson. Deeply religious and politically conservative, Ms. Goodling seemed to believe that part of her job was to bring people with similar values into the Justice Department, several former colleagues said.

  You know what? Based on all of the investigations that are on-going with the Bush Crime cartel and the many people that have been brought in from Regent University School of Law, there is no way that you can be a Christian, much less a deeply religious one, and a conservative at the same time.

   If George Bush, Monica Goodling, and the rest of these creeps are what Christianity is about, then I would rather be a atheist or a non-believer. This group of hoods is what gives true Christians a bad name.             Times will be very interesting when Monica M. Goodling goes before the Congressional oversight committee to testify about the attorney " surge, "  especially if she is asked about her role in doing things like this:

    Two years ago, Robin C. Ashton, a seasoned criminal prosecutor at the Department of Justice, learned from her boss that a promised promotion was no longer hers.

    “You have a Monica problem,” Ms. Ashton was told, according to several Justice Department officials. Referring to Monica M. Goodling, a 31-year-old, relatively inexperienced lawyer who had only recently arrived in the office, the boss added, “She believes you’re a Democrat and doesn’t feel you can be trusted.”      NYTimes

Ms. Goodling also moved to block the hiring of prosecutors with résumés that suggested they might be Democrats, even though they were seeking posts that were supposed to be nonpartisan, two department officials said.

And she helped maintain lists of all the United States attorneys that graded their loyalty to the Bush administration, including work on past political campaigns, and noted if they were members of the Federalist Society, a conservative legal group.

  As Ms. Goodling has been granted limited immunity for her testimony, maybe she can also be granted some limited prison time for her illegal actions while at DoJ.

Tags:

Oversight Committee Postpones Hearing With Rice and Tenet Over Rice's Travel Schedule

   I wish  that I could get a testimony postponed for a later date after I've been subpoena' d by the law or the government. That would be great!

May 14th, 2007 by Jesse Lee   The Gavel

From the Oversight and Government Reform Committee:

Rice Testimony Postponed
Tenet to Cooperate in Committee Investigation

WASHINGTON, DC — Today Chairman Henry A. Waxman announced that the Oversight Committee will postpone the hearing with Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice from May 15, 2007, to June 19, 2007. The hearing is being postponed to allow former CIA Director George Tenet to testify with Secretary Rice and to accommodate Secretary Rice’s travel schedule.

Mr. Tenet has agreed to cooperate with the Committee’s inquiry into whether the White House overstated Iraq’s efforts to obtain uranium from Africa and its nuclear threat in making the case for war. Mr. Tenet has agreed to provide a deposition to the Committee prior to the hearing.

The Committee also sent a letter to Stephen Hadley, the National Security Advisor, requesting his voluntary appearance at a deposition. Mr. Hadley was the Deputy National Security Advisor and Secretary Rice was the National Security Advisor when the President relied on evidence, which turned out to be false, about Iraq’s efforts to obtain uranium in his 2003 State of the Union address.

Secretary Rice refused repeated requests by Chairman Waxman to testify voluntarily before the Committee, leading the Committee to issue a subpoena for her appearance. Chairman Waxman continues to expect that she will comply with the congressional subpoena.

 

Tags:

John McCain and His " Straight Talk "

   John McCain was on NBC's " Meet The Press "  yesterday and still cannot get his story straight.

   McCain was asked about a statement that he had made while speaking at the American Enterprise Institute in 2005 in which he said, "If we can't retain the support of the American people, we will have lost this war as soundly as if our forces were defeated on the battlefield."

   Tim Russert: Haven't they lost the support of the American people?

  SEN. McCAIN: The consequences of failure, Tim, are that there would be chaos in the region. There's three--two million Sunni in Baghdad.  The Iranians would continue to increase their influence, the Saudis would have to help the Sunni, the Kurds would want independence, the Turks will never stand for it.  Some people say partition.  You'd have to partition bedrooms in Baghdad because Sunni and Shia are, are married.  This, this is a very, very difficult situation, but the consequences of failure, in my view, are unlike the Vietnam war where we could leave and come home and it was over, that these people will try to follow us home and the region will erupt to a point where we may have to come back or we will be compating-- combating what is now, to a large degree, al-Qaeda, although certainly other--many other factors of sectarian violence, in the region.

   Once again we get to hear how the terrorist will try and follow us home! Once again it is al-Qaeda even though it is already proven that they hardly make up 10% of the Iraq population.

  He fails to remember that the 9/11 attacks were planned out over at least a year if not longer and that the Saudi terrorist didn't just all jump on a plane and fly over here at the last minute to do their dirty work.

  If our security is as great as the Republicans claim it is ( no attacks since 9/11 ), then we should have nothing to worry about if we pull out of Iraq.

MR. RUSSERT The Pentagon's Quarterly Report, the director of the CIA, the director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, all have said that sectarian violence is the problem.  In fact, the--General Maples said that al-Qaeda accounts for only a small fraction of the insurgent violence.

SEN. McCAINYou know the...

MR. RUSSERTWho's our enemy?

SEN. McCAIN:  Well, first of all, General Petraeus, the general on the ground, does not agree with that.  Al-Qaeda is exploiting these sectarian differences.  They are trying to orchestrate attacks on both Sunni and Shia, but--in order to spark this and increase this sectarian violence that's going on.  Al-Qaeda is playing significantly.  Now, are there problems with sectarian violence?  Of course there is.  Is there other problems, such as in Anbar Province where Sunnis are now combatting al-Qaeda?  Are al-Qaeda being shoved out of Baghdad into areas outside of Baghdad?  Yes.  And are there problems in those areas?

    Why, Mr. McCain, of course General Petraeus doesn't agree with those reports! If he did then dear old George Bush would not have appointed him to his position as GOP mouthpiece for Iraq.

   On the fact that the citizens of the United states,and the majority of the Iraqi parliament want the troop withdrawn, as does the U.S. Congress McCain had this to say.

MR. RUSSERT ...then why do you stand there and say, "No, you can't have it"?

SEN. McCAIN Because it's my job to give my best estimate to the American people, no matter what the political calculations may be, as to what's the best in our nation's national security interest.  Young men and women are risking their lives as we speak in, in, in Iraq.  And I know that they will be in greater harm's way if we withdraw from Iraq, as we keep debating over and over and over again.  And I know what's best, in my mind, in my experience, in my knowledge, in my inspiration, as to what's best for this country.  So political calculations such as polls, I understand that if the American people don't continue to support this effort that we will be forced to withdraw.  But it's also my obligation to tell the American people and my constituents in Arizona that I represent, what the consequences of failure will be; and I believe they will be catastrophic.

MR. RUSSERT But the duly elected people's bodies, the U.S. Congress and the Iraqi parliament, say they want a troop withdrawal.  That's more than a poll.  Isn't that the voice of the people?

SEN. McCAINWell, the--as far as the Iraqi parliament is concerned, the Iraqi government obviously doesn't feel that way, their--the representatives in their government.  Second of all, there is some, a certain amount of domestic political calculations involved there in what the Iraqi, quote, "parliament" said.  The Iraqi parliament has their ability to, to voice their views, and I respect them.  And I, as I say, I--I'll repeat again, I understand how democracies work.  I saw it in Vietnam.  I saw it in Vietnam. And I saw it in Vietnam, the predictions, that everything would be a worker's paradise in, in Vietnam if we left.  And thousands were executed and millions went to re-education camps.  So I, I believe that, that the consequences of failure, and particularly sitting on the large reserves of oil they have, particularly considering the influence of al-Qaeda is concerned, you will see enormous destabilization in the region, and that's my duty.  That's my obligation.  It's not my privilege.  And political calculations should not enter into any information or position that I take on, on a, on an issue of national security.      Entire Transcript

   Have you noticed how none of the GOP wanna-be's can talk about Iraq without having the oil at the top of their lists? the major oil companies must be paying the GOP and some of the Democrats above average to get this kind of bullshit commitment!

Tags:  

Is 9/11 Heroism Overshadowing Giuliani's Incompetence?

   Not enforcing federal rules requiring workers at the 9/11 site to wear their safety equipment and not letting the federal government agencies do their jobs (FEMA, Army Corps of Engineers,OSHA ) when they arrived at the scene are a few of the things that an article in New York Times says has occurred under Rudy Giuliani's handling of the 9/11 disaster.

   The Republican faithful will call this article a smear campaign and it should be one. This man wants to be president so bad that he threw whatever morals that he did have, out the window to score points for his BIO.

   His leadership in NYC after 9/11 is the only thing he can run in and that leadership has become questionable as of late. I should not say as of late because the info has been out there for a long time but no one cared until he decided that he wanted to be the next GOP president.

An examination of Mr. Giuliani’s handling of the extraordinary recovery operation during his last months in office shows that he seized control and largely limited the influence of experienced federal agencies. In doing that, according to some experts and many of those who worked in the trade center’s ruins, Mr. Giuliani might have allowed his sense of purpose to trump caution in the rush to prove that his city was not crippled by the attack.

   Giuliani did not force firefighters, rescue workers and other groups to wear their respirators is one of the complaints against him. As much as I hate doing this, I'll side with Giuliani on this one for the simple reason that the workers and the others should have had enough common sense to know that breathing this dust and other toxic materials in, would cost them later on down the line. You do not need an Einstein I.Q. to figure that out.

Mr. Giuliani has said very little publicly about how his leadership might have influenced the behavior of the men and women who worked at ground zero. Mr. Giuliani, whose image as a 9/11 hero has been a focus of his run for president, declined to be interviewed for this article. His representatives did not respond to specific questions about the pace of the cleanup, the hazards at the site and Mr. Giuliani’s reticence about the workers’ illnesses.

Moreover, many of the people who ran agencies for Mr. Giuliani or who handled responsibility for the health issues after he left office would not comment, citing the pending litigation.

   Of course he wouldn't want to be interviewed over this mess! It would not show him to be the great " 9/11 hero " that he wants the public to see.

   Now, about the federal agencies that arrived at the scene in very short time.

Despite the presence of those federal experts, Mr. Giuliani assigned the ground zero cleanup to a largely unknown city agency, the Department of Design and Construction. Kenneth Holden, the department’s commissioner until January 2004, said in a deposition in the federal lawsuit against the city that he initially expected FEMA or the Army Corps to try to take over the cleanup operation. Mr. Giuliani never let them.

  I wager that the Department of Design and Construction was one of Rudy's close friends, like the mafia guy.

  This man is no more fit to be a president of this country any more than George Bush is fit to be a president. I wouldn't let either Bush, McCain, or Giuliani be the president of the " do nothing club" which they are very qualified to be members of.

Tags:

Sunday, May 13, 2007

Senator McConnell Says Benchmarks Are Good and Says Democratic Lead Congress Has Low Ratings Because Nothing Is Getting Passed

   CNN's " Late Edition with Wolf Blitzer "  had Kentucky Senator Mitch McConnell on the program today and he was asked about a comment that Senator Harry Reid had made about President Bush on Friday. First, here is Sen. Reid's comment:

CNN Transcript

    SEN. HARRY REID, D-NEV.: The president is in a bubble. He is isolated. Every day the ranks of dissatisfied Republicans grow. But I wish that my Republican colleagues, who now agree that President Bush's open-ended commitment has failed, would put some teeth behind their views.

BLITZER: All right, do you want to respond to those strong words from Harry Reid?
MCCONNELL: Well, let me tell you what I think Republicans believe overwhelmingly, is that the decision to get on offense in the war on terror after 9/11 in Afghanistan and Iraq has protected us fully here at home. That part has been an enormous success.
What we are all discovering, however, it's very difficult to set up a functioning government in places like Iraq and Afghanistan. It's gone better in Afghanistan than in Iraq. It's very, very difficult to do that, very challenging.
What we have to ask ourselves is, if we give up prematurely, we go home, declare it over, will they be back here on the -- in our own country? And I think the chances of that are overwhelmingly likely.

   As is usual, the Republican Senator had his usual GOP facts in hand. I guess that he hasn't read the reports which say that the terrorist following our troops back to the United States are next to zero. I have parts of the report somewhere here at this blog in a different post.

   On the Republicans coming around to a funding bill with some benchmarks in it, McConnell said:

MCCONNELL: Absolutely. The president himself mentioned benchmarks back in January. We had a proposal that ended up not being voted on by Senator McCain and Senator Lieberman and Senator Lindsey Graham, who you're going to have on later in the program, related to benchmarks for the Iraqi government earlier this year. I think benchmarks will be a part of the final package that we get to the president for signature on the troop funding bill.
BLITZER: The question is, how binding will those benchmarks be? Will they be goals that they have to meet, and if they don't, nothing's going to happen? Or will there be specific steps taken if they don't take these de-Baathification, oil sharing, disbanding the militias, if they don't take the steps that the U.S. would clearly like them to take?                                                                                   MCCONNELL: Well, you know, the House Democrats have gone from micromanaging the war to now trying to microfund the war. Splitting up the funding. The good news is that there's a bipartisan majority in opposition to that in the Senate, including the majority leader of the Senate and the chairman, the Democratic chairman of the Armed Service Committee, Senator Levin, both of whom think that splitting up the funding is a bad idea.

     My question on this part of the interview is, why didn't Blitzer pursue McConnell to get a straight answer to the question instead of letting McConnell change the subject. not that the answer would have mattered to much because we all know that any benchmarks which Bush agrees to will have not bite in them, just more promises to be broken.

MCCONNELL: Well, the president knows what's going on. He's heard it before. And he knows what's happening in Iraq. He's not in a bubble, he's not isolated. What he's trying to do is succeed. And we have to continue to ask ourselves, if we go in a different direction, what is it? What is the option? Do we want to allow Iraq to be a failed state? Do we want to embolden al Qaeda and really almost invite them to come back here again?  ( My Emphasis )
BLITZER: But the U.S. can't want all those things more than the Iraqis themselves.
MCCONNELL: That is a very good point.
BLITZER: And if they're not going to do what they need to do, what happens then?
MCCONNELL: Well, the Iraqi government is a huge disappointment. Republicans overwhelmingly feel disappointed about the Iraqi government. I read just this week that a significant number of the Iraqi parliament want to vote to ask us to leave.
I want to assure you, Wolf, if they vote to ask us to leave, we'll be glad to comply with their request.

BLITZER: And if they want to take two months vacation this summer, while American troops are dying, what's going to be your reaction to that?
MCCONNELL: That's completely and totally unacceptable.

BLITZER: Let's talk a little bit about the GOP in revolt, as some Republicans are worried. In our latest CNN Opinion Research Corporation poll, we asked the American people, "do you favor or oppose the war?" Sixty-five percent now say they oppose the war; 34 percent favor. And on the issue of a timeline for withdrawal, 57 percent say they favor such a timeline; 41 percent oppose.
How worried are you, as the top Republican in the Senate, that you are going to lose not only Republican support for what the president's stance is, but next year in the elections, that your minority status would be widened in the U.S. Senate? There are a lot of vulnerable Republicans up for reelection next year.

MCCONNELL: There's another interesting poll out this week that has a rating of the Congress down as low as the president. People are beginning to figure out that the new Democratic majority has not been able to pass anything. Not a single one of their "Six in '06" agenda items has made it to the president's desk.
The American people are beginning to figure out that the Democrats are so preoccupied with this one issue that they are not accomplishing anything else.
And so, I want to assure you, Wolf, that the election next year will not just be about Iraq, it will also be about the new Congress. What did they do? Did they produce anything for the American people?
The day I was elected Republican leader, I said divided government sometimes presents a great opportunity do important things. And I mentioned immigration. Maybe we'll get there. And Social Security is two extremely important things that we ought to accomplish for the American people.
So far, the new majority hasn't gotten anything done.

  And last but not least, McConnell was pointed out to the fact that 65% of Americans oppose the war and that 57% favor a withdrawal timeline from Iraq.   McConnell's response?

MCCONNELL: There's another interesting poll out this week that has a rating of the Congress down as low as the president. People are beginning to figure out that the new Democratic majority has not been able to pass anything. Not a single one of their "Six in '06" agenda items has made it to the president's desk.
The American people are beginning to figure out that the Democrats are so preoccupied with this one issue that they are not accomplishing anything else.
And so, I want to assure you, Wolf, that the election next year will not just be about Iraq, it will also be about the new Congress. What did they do? Did they produce anything for the American people?
The day I was elected Republican leader, I said divided government sometimes presents a great opportunity do important things. And I mentioned immigration. Maybe we'll get there. And Social Security is two extremely important things that we ought to accomplish for the American people.
So far, the new majority hasn't gotten anything done.

   He conveniently forgot to mention the fact that almost every time a bill makes it out of the House and to the Senate, the Republicans try to attach something to it that they know the Democrats will not agree to or they either block the bill. The minimum wage bill would be one good example.

Tags:

Saturday, May 12, 2007

Michael Moore Writes Letter To Secretary Henry Paulson Over Cuba Flap

   By now you all know that the ever moral Bush administration is investigating Michael Moore for taking some clean up workers from 9/11 to Cuba for better treatment than they were getting here in the states.

   AlterNet has an open letter from  Mr. Moore to U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson

Secretary Henry Paulson

Department of the Treasury

Secretary Paulson,

I am contacting you in light of the document sent to me dated May 2, 2007, which was received May 7, 2007 indicating that an investigation has been opened up with regards to a trip I took to Cuba with a group of Americans that included some 9/11 heroes in March 2007 related to the filming of my next documentary, on the American Healthcare system. SiCKO, which will be seen in theaters this summer, will expose the health care industry's greed and control over America's political processes.

I believe that the decision to conduct this investigation represents the latest example of the Bush Administration abusing the federal government for raw, crass, political purposes. Over the last seven years of the Bush Presidency, we have seen the abuse of government to promote a political agenda designed to benefit the conservative base of the Republican Party, special interests and major financial contributors. From holding secret meetings for the energy industry to re-writing science findings to cooking the books on intelligence to the firing of U.S. Attorneys, this Administration has shown time and time again that it will abuse its power and authority.

There are a number of specific facts that have led me to conclude that politics could very well be driving this Bush Administration investigation of me and my film.

First, the Bush Administration has been aware of this matter for months (since October 2006) and never took any action until less than two weeks before SiCKO is set to premiere at the Cannes Film Festival and a little more than a month before it is scheduled to open in the United States.

Second, the health care and insurance industry, which is exposed in the movie and has expressed concerns about the impact of the movie on their industries, is a major corporate underwriter of President George W. Bush and the Republican Party, having contributed over $13 million to the Bush presidential campaign in 2004 and more than $180 million to Republican candidates over the last two campaign cycles.

It is well documented that the industry is very concerned about the impact of SiCKO. They have threatened their employees if they talk to me. They have set up special internal crises lines should I show up at their headquarters. Employees have been warned about the consequences of participating in SiCKO. Despite this, some employees, at great risk to themselves, have gone on camera to tell the American people the truth about the health care industry. I can understand why that industry's main recipient of its contributions -- President Bush -- would want to harass, intimidate and potentially prevent this film from having its widest possible audience.

And, third, this investigation is being opened in the wake of misleading attacks on the purpose of the Cuba trip from a possible leading Republican candidate for president, Fred Thompson, a major conservative newspaper, The New York Post, and various right wing blogs.

For five and a half years, the Bush administration has ignored and neglected the heroes of the 9/11 community. These heroic first responders have been left to fend for themselves, without coverage and without care. I understand why the Bush administration is coming after me -- I have tried to help the very people they refuse to help, but until George W. Bush outlaws helping your fellow man, I have broken no laws and I have nothing to hide.

I demand that the Bush Administration immediately end this investigation and spend its time and resources trying to support some of the real heroes of 9/11.

Sincerely,

Michael Moore

   Perhaps if this corrupt government in D.C. and the former mayor of New York ( Giuliani ) had done the right thing in the first place and got these workers the treatment that was required, Mr. Moore wouldn't have had to take these people out of country in the first place.

   Under the Bush group, this would go in line with family members having to buy their sons and daughters in Iraq the vests and other equipment that they so badly need. $ 500 billion, where is this cash going? Sorry, that was a stupid question. It goes to Halliburton, Blackwater and a few others who may happen to be lining the pockets of Bush Inc.

 

Tags:

Friday, May 11, 2007

Iraq President Says We Should Stay In Iraq For Another Year Or Two

     Iraq's president,Jalal Talabani, on Friday told the students at the   University of Cambridge that Iraq was safer because of Saddam Hussein's removal and that many of the Iraqi citizens were living normal lives.

    He also said that the United States and British troops need to stay in Iraq for a couple of years to stem the flow of blood in the country.

Jalal Talabani: "I think within one or two years, we will be able to recruit our forces and prepare our armed forces and tell goodbye to our friends."

 On the U.S. Congress and the war funding bill, he said this: "We are concerned. We hope that Congress will review this decision and help the American army to stay until the Iraqi army will be able to replace them and to protect the security of Iraq."

"We are planning to show some tangible achievements to the Congress that we are going forward for national reconciliation, for national unity, for fighting terrorism and achieving peace and security in our country."

   Sorry President Talabani, but your comments are worthless since they sound more like a script handed to you from Cheney and Bush. I see that they have the Iraqi government now using the Republican talking points manual to get the Americans into backing this Bush bullshit, which isn't going to work.

  I think that we have had more than enough of our citizens getting killed for an Iraqi government that wishes to take a two month vacation in the midst of all of this crap. I think that we have had enough of our president using our tax dollars to pay off all of his loyal " bushies " and business friends in order to profit from this so called war.

    You sir, do not have years. You have until NOW!

   Whoever thought that you would hear of such a thing as an Iraqi Republican?

 

Tags:

Another Law Slipped Into The Patriot Act to Be Reversed?

    I generally do not cover to much of the attorney " purge " scandal because other places seem to have the story down very well. However, this piece from Talking Points Memo caught my attention.

Last month, the Congress passed* a bill reversing one of those provisions -- one that made it possible for the attorney general to indefinitely appoint U.S. attorneys without Senate confirmation.

Now Four Democrats are trying to undo another of those little-noticed provisions -- one that made it possible for certain U.S. attorneys to pull double duty in the Justice Department leadership. The provision was shepherded through by William Mercer, the principal associate deputy attorney general, who's also the U.S. Attorney for Montana. When the chief judge in his district, hopping mad that Mercer is gone almost all the time, charged that Mercer was violating the residency requirement for U.S. attorneys, Mercer had the law changed. And he's kept both jobs for two years.

  Someone once stated that the mafia were angels compared to this corrupt group of Bush Crime Family members, they were right.

The punchline to all this, remember, is that Justice Department officials have claimed that U.S. Attorney for New Mexico David Iglesias was fired because he was an "absentee landlord," spending 30 days a year away from the office -- on Navy reserve duty.

   More of the Republican " Family Values Tour " at work. More of our hard earned tax dollars getting stolen and pocketed by these shitheads.

   Impeachment should be placed back on the table!

 

Tags:   

GOP Will Do Nothing Different In September

  September, September, September! The magic month. the time to see if there is any progress in Iraq and then the  time to see if George bush and clan will see the light and agree to funding with a withdrawal timetable in it.

   But anyone with any sense of an I.Q. knows that this is not going to happen no matter what kinds of improvements are visible or not. we all know that there will be no improvement and that the Republicans will then say that the " surge " needs just a little more time to take affect. Something like six months, since that seems to be their favorite time zone. How many times have you all heard " six more months"?

   Nothing will change in September. Those 11 Republicans who went into a meeting with Bush the other day and voiced their "grave concerns"  will still back Bush in September, as they always have. The meeting was the usual GOP bullshit! Lets's look tough to the public but vote differently when the time comes.

Did any one of those 11 back up this "grave unease" with their votes yesterday? The answer is no. All 11 voted straight party line with Bush.

"But wait," you say. "Straight party line? I thought at least that two Republicans crossed over to vote with Dems yesterday?"

Yeah, they did: Wayne Gilchrest and Walter Jones.

But they weren't invited to the White House to express their "grave unease."       Source

   Don't hold your breath waiting for most of the Republicans to do anything of any worth come September because they won't.

   They are to stupid to realize that they have no chance in hell come 2008 if they keep voting the usual party line.

   Bush is a wannabe-someone who will never be. Giuliani and McCain are on the same boat with Bush and are going down with this pathetic excuse for a human.

 

Tags:  

U.S. District Judge Approves Monica Goodling Immunity

      It now appears that former Justice Department aide Monica Goodling will get to testify to Congress about those eight federal prosecutors who were fired because of " poor performance."        Source                                         

    U.S. District Judge Thomas Hogan approved the deal to give Goodling immunity from prosecution, which Congress agreed to. Goodling had refused to testify unless she was given the immunity, so now things should get really interesting for Bush/Rove and Gonzales.

"Monica Goodling may not refuse to testify," Hogan began his brief order, which said that Goodling could not be prosecuted for anything other than perjury in connection with her testimony.

Lawmakers want to question Goodling as part of an inquiry into whether the Justice Department played politics with the hiring and firing of department officials. What began as an inquiry into whether U.S. attorneys were fired for political reasons has grown to include the role of the White House in the firings and whether the Justice Department officials misled Congress about them.

Goodling's lawyer has said that, with an immunity deal, she would cooperate and testify honestly.

   My take is that Monica Goodling will go before the Congress, and just as Gonzales has done, she will have a memory lapse and she simply will not remember the circumstances to some of the questions which she will be asked. Typical Republican b.s. Then again, there is the slight chance that she will become a humane being with some morals and answer as she should, truthfully and completely.

Tags:

Friday News Blastoff! OxyContin,Iraqi Parliament, and Mexican Trucks Everywhere?

ABINGDON, Va., May 10 — The company that makes the painkiller OxyContin and three of its current and former executives pleaded guilty Thursday in federal court here to criminal charges that it had misled doctors and patients when it claimed the drug was less likely to be abused than traditional narcotics.

The company, Purdue Pharma, agreed to pay $600 million in fines and other payments to resolve the criminal charge of “misbranding” the product, one of the largest amounts ever paid by a drug company in such a case.

The three executives, including its president and its top lawyer, also pleaded guilty to misdemeanor charges of misbranding the drug. Together, they agreed to pay $34.5 million in fines                    NYTIMES

-----------------------------------

BAGHDAD, May 10 -- A majority of members of Iraq's parliament have signed a draft bill that would require a timetable for the withdrawal of U.S. soldiers from Iraq and freeze current troop levels. The development was a sign of a growing division between Iraq's legislators and prime minister that mirrors the widening gulf between the Bush administration and its critics in Congress.

The draft bill proposes a timeline for a gradual departure, much like what some U.S. Democratic lawmakers have demanded, and would require the Iraqi government to secure parliament's approval before any further extensions of the U.N. mandate for foreign troops in Iraq, which expires at the end of 2007.

"We haven't asked for the immediate withdrawal of multinational forces; we asked that we should build our security forces and make them qualified, and at that point there would be a withdrawal," said Bahaa al-Araji, a member of parliament allied with the anti-American Shiite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr, whose supporters drafted the bill. "But no one can accept the occupation of his country."    WaPo

------------------------

The day may be nearing when Mexican trucks will carry freight deep into Arizona and other states for the first time in a generation.

The prospect has rekindled controversy over the safety of Mexican trucks, the fairness of international trade agreements and the effectiveness of border security efforts.

The latest round of debates comes as the U.S. government prepares to open up the southern border to 100 Mexican trucking companies as part of a one-year experiment. Tucson Citizen

 

Tags:    

Iraqis Visit U.S. Congress Members To Push GOP Talking Points

        The fine government of Iraq sent some of their senior people to Washington to lobby the Congress against pulling U.S. troops out of their country, saying the usual Bush chant that pulling out would have disastrous consequences.        Source

On Thursday, hours before the House voted to limit funds for the war, Iraqi Deputy Prime Minister Barham Saleh met with more than 30 House Republicans and more than a half-dozen senators, including Sens. Harry Reid, D-Nev., John Warner, R-Va., and Hillary Clinton.

With the clock ticking, Saleh — a Kurdish politician highly regarded by U.S. officials and who speaks impeccable English — said he came to Capitol Hill to convey the "imperative of success" in Iraq.

"Iraq is a central battleground in this historic conflict" against terrorism, he said in a brief interview after meeting with Reid, the Senate majority leader.

   I guess that it would be safe to say that Cheney didn't do to much arm twisting in regards to getting the Iraqi government to get with the program or else lose support. More like he went to make sure that Saleh had his rehearsed script and was ready to deliver the White House line of bullshit.

"Our armed forces are up to 150,000 troops; we're over $600 billion appropriated for this, lost 3,300 lives, 25,000 wounded fellow citizens. ... And the Iraqi answer? We're taking a summer off. Goin' fishing," said Rep. Rahm Emanuel, D-Ill.

Saleh said he expects the vacation to be shortened by at least a month, although nothing had been decided. He added that Iraqis value being independent and do "not take kindly of (U.S. officials) telling us when to recess."

    A statement such as that one would have me pulling the plug on Iraq no matter how much oil the country has.

   If Bush were a real man and President, he would have told this Iraqi Republican wannabe to shut the fuck up and get ready for the policing of your country by your own military because ours are leaving.

    On the other hand, if Bush were a real man we would never have gone into Iraq in the first place.

Tags:

Thursday, May 10, 2007

Tony Snow Press Briefing Was A lot About Nothing, As Is Usual

      Ladies and Gentleman, a peek at today's White House press briefing with the ever faithful, severely mis-guided Tony Snow!

  May 10, 2007

Q One last thing about -- in connection with the Vice President's trip. On board Air Force Two yesterday, senior administration officials said of the trip, and the message, "We've got to get this work done. It's game time." -- what does that suggest about the first four years of the war? Is it that the administration is just now saying that that was a scrimmage and now it's game time? What does that mean?

MR. SNOW: I think that's simply -- it gets back to what the President is saying. In some ways, there may be perceptions of two different clocks, Baghdad and Washington. The President said, you've got to speed up the clock. It is a matter of realizing that there have been a lot of efforts now. We've been working on this joint way forward in Iraq. You are getting results in a number of areas. We have been talking and working with the Iraqis on political, economic, and other reform.

As the President was pointing out, there are very key things that people want and expect to see, because you know it has to happen. If you want success in Iraq, you have got to have political accommodation, you've got to have the oil law, you've got to have constitutional reform, you've got to have the elections, you've got to have de-Baathification. All of those things are necessities; everybody knows it. It is tough to get to those points, but you've got to do it.

 

Q Is there a point when the President does become concerned with the political ramifications for the party? As I understand it, during the meeting there was an argument made that "our members are worried they're going to lose their seats," and that will be bad for the war policy overall.

MR. SNOW: What the President's main concern is, it's bad for the country if you have a vacuum. It is, in fact, it is something that the country simply must not permit to happen and cannot afford, which is a failure in Iraq that would create a vacuum that would empower Iran, that would give al Qaeda a staging ground, that would shred American credibility in the region, that would create economic consequences --

Q Who's the cause of all that?

MR. SNOW: Well, notice again --

Q Who went into Iraq and created this chaos?

   Next dish, please!

MR. SNOW: Thank you. And so, to continue

      Again with the al Qaeda staging ground bullshit! In case Mr .Snow has not noticed, the United States has no credibility in the mid-east, with the exception of Israel. The United States has no credibility anywhere, not even at home thanks to George Bush.

Q The President emphasized September and he emphasized General Petraeus' report -- all week you moved away from September. Is it a real important date for us to decide things?

MR. SNOW: I think what the President is saying is --

Q Does he know that we have civilian rule in this country?

MR. SNOW: Yes. Do you?

Q I do.

MR. SNOW: Okay, good.

Q I'm not waiting for Petraeus.

   I like this reporter. someone up near the White House with a set of nuts! Sure Bush is aware that civilians rule this country, that's why he is trying his damndest to strip those rights away from us citizens.

 

Tags:

Iraqi Citizens "Hostile" and "Humiliated"

     That is how Borzou Daragahi, formerly the Los Angeles Times Baghdad Bureau Chief, described the Iraqi citizens and he also said  that he doubts the troop " surge " in Iraq will work.

NEW YORK Former Los Angeles Times Baghdad Bureau Chief Borzou Daragahi says he doubts the "surge" in Iraq will work, and describes Iraq citizens as "hostile" and "humiliated" after four years of war.
Asked by Brian Lamb, in a forthcoming C-SPAN interview, about his personal views on the war, he replied: "I think at this point, it just – it seems like it’s become a disaster. I mean, I don’t think anyone could dispute that. It’s just going very, very, very, very badly." He said he had mixed feelings about the invasion but "As time wore on, though, as the bodies mounted, it just seems more and more like a really bad mistake."
The interview will be broadcast Sunday night.

Highlight of the interview, from a C-SPAN transcript:

On why Iraqis feel humiliated:
"Iraqis are rather hostile and feel humiliated. And that's the key thing that maybe some of our policymakers don't understand. The presence of the U.S. soldiers is very humiliating to the Iraqis. Even those who, in their minds know that it's necessary to have the soldiers there, at least some kind of force there preventing an all-out civil war from getting even worse...I don't think they appreciate American culture."      READ MORE

  This should be an interesting program.

 

Tags:

Bush's 41-Second F.U. To The United States

     Back on January 4,2006 Bush did another one of his " screw America " jobs by appointing 17 of his friends to posts in the Federal Election Commission, National Labor Relations Board, and a few other federal offices. It would appear that since he couldn't get them confirmed by the Senate, he waited for a congressional recess so that he could just bypass the confirmation process. Keep in mind that this was a Republican controlled Senate at the time and even they didn't like his choices for these positions.

   As Nick Burt over at In These Times has pointed out, this would be just more cronyism of the part of Bush. So what's new, right?

The recess appointments avoided floor fights over dubiously credentialed nominees, including a former oil executive, a former president of a weapons manufacturer and a relative of a cabinet employee. All told, they include eight donors to Bush’s presidential campaigns.   

Two of the appointees are 2004 Bush-Cheney Campaign “Rangers,” supporters who are being rewarded for having “bundled” at least $200,000 in $2,000 contributions from individuals. Among the 221 Rangers were Roger Wallace, who was named to the Board of Directors of the Inter-American Foundation, and Stephen Goldsmith, who now sits on the Board of Directors of the Corporation for National and Community Service.       MORE

  This is a pretty loyal group of " bushies " in which nine of the seventeen have contributed $440,585 to either Bush or the GOP.

   These appointments were made by Bush between sessions of Congress in order to have them around for a longer period of time. Many thought that these hoods would be gone in January 2007 with the new Congress coming in, but that ain't so.

If the President makes a recess appointment between sessions or between Congresses, that appointment will expire at the end of the following session. 

If he makes the appointment during a recess in the middle of a session, that appointment also will expire at the end of the following session. In this case, the duration of the appointment will include the balance of the session in progress plus the full length of the session that follows.

   As is noted at the Daily Kos:

The Senate calendar on the Democratic site shows no meeting until Congress opened on January 18, 2006, which would lead one to assume that date marked the opening of the second year of the 109th Congress. But the Library of Congress indicates a session was held on January 3, 2006, thus officially opening the 109th. And lo and behold, the Daily Digest reports a 41-second pro forma Senate session, from 12:00:04 PM to 12:00:45 P.M., on that date. The Senate convened, immediately adjourned and thus began a "recess in the middle of the session," not meeting again until January 18, 2006.

The day following the less-than-a-minute convening, of course, Bush made his recess appointments—now officially during a session of Congress—which allowed his eminently rejectable appointees to complete the "balance of the session in progress plus the full length of the session that follows."

  So Bush and the rest of his criminal enterprise snuck in a 41 second session of Congress just so that he could appoint these inept fools and keep them around for a few years instead of a few months.

   Yet, we still have House Speaker Pelosi and Senator Reid saying that they have more important things to do other than impeaching Cheney and Bush. They might as well start working on impeachment since they aren't doing a whole hell of a lot about getting our troops out of Iraq.

 

Tags:    

 

 

 

 

 

 

Wednesday, May 09, 2007

Are The Democrats Supporting Bush Or The Troops?

     Much is being made as of late about the Bush veto of the Iraq war funding bill last week and we are already hearing a bunch of shit about how Bush will veto the next bill that the Democrats are crafting.

   Now the bill would fund the war only through July, instead of September. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said that this would be disastrous. What else would this shithead say?

   Bush is looking for some $90 billion in funding for the war in Iraq and Afghanistan through September, not a partial payment, which the Democrats are offering.

In a flash of defiance, House Democratic leaders this week promoted legislation that would provide the military $42.8 billion to keep operations going through July, buy new equipment and train Iraqi and Afghan security forces. Congress would decide shortly before its August recess whether to release an additional $52.8 billion to fund the war through September.

"In essence, the bill asks me to run the Department of Defense like a skiff, and I'm trying to drive the biggest supertanker in the world," Gates told senators Wednesday. "And we just don't have the agility to be able to manage a two-month appropriation very well."     Yahoo News

   I put in all of this to get to this.

   If the Democrats are serious about getting our troops out of Iraq, then why are the screwing around with " benchmarks " and " timelines " and such crap? Why the hell are they even considering funding  any of this crap in the first place, only in stages? Funding the war for two months at a time doesn't support our troops any more than funding them eternally does!

  If these clowns ( Pelosi, Reid, Murtha ) where serious about bringing our troops back from Iraq, there would be not one dime spent with the exception of the money to bring the troops and the equipment home.

  It is that simple! don't let the politicians con you with the crap about these things take time because that's bullshit. You either fund the war, or you don't fund the war, plain and simple.

   So now we have the Democrats wanting to wait a little longer and see what happens with this troop surge. That simply means that the house leadership  have no problem with a few more of our troops getting killed.

Tags: